- You will hear a conversation followed by 5 questions.
- Listen to each question. You will hear the question only once.
- Choose the best answer to each question.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: For their weekly check-in.
Why this is correct: The person leading the conversation explicitly identifies their weekly check-in.
Tips: Match the specific statement or relationship asked about, and keep reported claims and suggestions with their stated source.
Why the other options are wrong:
- To debate a company policy.: The meeting is identified as a weekly check-in; no policy debate is proposed.
- To conduct a job interview.: The speakers discuss ongoing work concerns, rather than an application for a job.
- For a monthly staff meeting.: The check-in is described as weekly, not monthly.
Correct Answer: Negative comments from coworkers.
Why this is correct: Elaine reports comments from coworkers about work performance and negative feedback at department meetings.
Tips: Match the specific statement or relationship asked about, and keep reported claims and suggestions with their stated source.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Having to give presentations.: Elaine does not identify giving presentations as the concern.
- The meetings being cancelled.: The meetings take place; cancellation is not described.
- Being interviewed for a new job.: Elaine discusses comments on current work performance, not an interview for a new job.
Correct Answer: They make Elaine doubt their work.
Why this is correct: Elaine says the comments lead to questioning whether they are doing as good a job as they could.
Tips: Match the specific statement or relationship asked about, and keep reported claims and suggestions with their stated source.
Why the other options are wrong:
- They make Elaine more confident.: Elaine says the comments lead to questioning their own work.
- They make Elaine eager to lead meetings.: Elaine does not say the comments create a wish to lead meetings.
- They make Elaine enthusiastic about training.: Training is mentioned as coworkers’ criticism, not as something that makes Elaine enthusiastic.
Correct Answer: Take the training class again.
Why this is correct: The person leading the check-in repeats what the coworkers say: be more up to speed or take the class again. The suggestion originates with the coworkers.
Tips: Match the specific statement or relationship asked about, and keep reported claims and suggestions with their stated source.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Stop attending department meetings.: The coworkers are not quoted recommending that Elaine stop attending meetings.
- Change departments immediately.: Changing departments is not the suggestion reported.
- Train all the other staff.: The reported suggestion is to attend training again, rather than train other staff.
Correct Answer: Elaine starts believing what others say about them.
Why this is correct: The person leading the check-in observes that Elaine starts believing the comments. This is supported by the second-person observation, without relying on the final short acknowledgements.
Tips: Match the specific statement or relationship asked about, and keep reported claims and suggestions with their stated source.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Elaine ignores all the comments.: Elaine says the comments bother them, and the other person observes that Elaine starts believing them.
- Elaine focuses only on helping coworkers.: The observation concerns Elaine’s self-doubt, not helping coworkers.
- Elaine feels positive about every meeting.: Elaine describes negative feedback and questions their own performance.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation