Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
CELPIP Practice Listening: Discussion ID: #61405 Medium The Sidewalks Along Alder Crescent
Instructions ›
  • You will watch a 2-minute video. Then 8 questions will appear.
  • Choose the best way to answer each question.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.

Correct Answer: How to fund sidewalk repairs on Alder Crescent that the city has flagged as a tripping hazard.

Why this is correct: The opening reports that the city has flagged the sidewalks as a tripping hazard and asks how to pay for the repairs. The whole talk is about money for fixing sidewalks. Reserve funds, a levy and a grant are funding alternatives.

Tips: For main idea questions, focus on the first speaker and repeated topics.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • How to convince the City of Langley to take over sidewalk ownership.: The city’s notice requires repairs; the proposals concern paying for them, not transferring ownership to the city.
  • How to appeal a municipal by-law violation related to property maintenance.: The speakers treat repairs as necessary and discuss funding them, rather than appealing the by-law notice.
  • How to reduce property taxes for residents on Alder Crescent.: Property taxes are mentioned as a concern, not the main issue.

Correct Answer: The person on the left suggests using the reserve fund, since it was built up for infrastructure.

Why this is correct: The person on the left first favours the available reserve fund because it was accumulated for infrastructure expenses.

Tips: Listen for the first suggestion the speaker makes.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • The person on the left suggests taking out a bank loan on behalf of the community.: A bank loan is not the person on the left's initial suggestion.
  • The person on the left suggests waiting for the provincial government to offer funding.: Waiting for government funding is not the person on the left's suggestion.
  • The person on the left suggests asking each homeowner to pay for the section in front of their property.: Individual property-front payments are not the person on the left's suggestion.

Correct Answer: The person in the centre worries that draining it all at once could leave nothing for snow removal or lighting.

Why this is correct: The person in the centre says they are uneasy about using all the reserve fund. They explain the money may be needed later for snow removal or lighting. This shows concern about future expenses.

Tips: Follow the scope of the question and distinguish the stated point from other suggestions.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • The person in the centre thinks the reserve fund has already been committed to another project.: A pre-existing commitment of the entire reserve is not stated.
  • The person in the centre believes the reserve fund is legally restricted to emergency use only.: An emergency-only legal restriction is not stated.
  • The person in the centre is concerned that using it would require a formal vote by all residents.: A formal resident-vote requirement is not the person in the centre's concern.

Correct Answer: The person on the right mentions a temporary special levy for the street to spread costs more evenly.

Why this is correct: After hearing concerns, the person on the right brings up another option. They say neighbours suggested a temporary special levy. This matches "a temporary levy". It would spread costs more evenly, although residents object to rising taxes.

Tips: For option questions, listen for signal phrases like another option or perhaps.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • The person on the right mentions selling community land to raise funds.: Selling land is never discussed in the meeting.
  • The person on the right mentions asking a local business to sponsor the repairs.: Business sponsorship is not mentioned.
  • The person on the right mentions hiring volunteers to do the repairs instead of a contractor.: Volunteer repair work is not mentioned.

Correct Answer: The person in the centre suggests applying for the provincial neighbourhood infrastructure grant.

Why this is correct: The person in the centre suggests the provincial neighbourhood infrastructure grant, citing a similar use in Surrey.

Tips: Follow the scope of the question and distinguish the stated point from other suggestions.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • The person in the centre suggests a crowdfunding campaign among community members.: Crowdfunding is not the person in the centre's suggestion.
  • The person in the centre suggests redirecting funds from the neighbourhood holiday celebration.: Holiday funds are not the person in the centre's suggestion.
  • The person in the centre suggests renting out community facilities to generate income.: Facility-rental income is not the person in the centre's suggestion.

Correct Answer: The person on the left believes grants take too long and they cannot count on quick approval.

Why this is correct: The person on the left says grants are helpful but approval may not be quick. The person on the left worries they cannot count on it in time. This shows concern about slow approval. Repairs are needed before the fall rains.

Tips: For concern questions, focus on negative or warning words.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • The person on the left is worried that accepting a grant would come with unwanted conditions.: Unwanted grant conditions are not the person on the left's reason.
  • The person on the left thinks applying for grants would require hiring a professional consultant.: A required professional consultant is not the person on the left's reason.
  • The person on the left does not trust the provincial government to distribute funds fairly.: Unfair grant distribution is not the person on the left's objection.

Correct Answer: It is more transparent than taking money from the reserve without residents knowing.

Why this is correct: The person on the left acknowledges greater transparency in a levy than withdrawing reserves without people knowing.

Tips: Follow the scope of the question and distinguish the stated point from other suggestions.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • It automatically repays every reserve withdrawal.: Automatic reserve repayment is not promised.
  • It guarantees the city will pay half the cost.: A guaranteed city half-share is not stated.
  • It turns every repair contribution into a voluntary donation.: Voluntary donations are not the levy advantage the person on the left identifies.

Correct Answer: Get repair quotes and proceed from there.

Why this is correct: The closing suggestion is to obtain repair quotes and use that information to proceed.

Tips: For next step questions, focus on the final speaker.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • Meet the provincial grant office immediately.: A grant-office meeting is not assigned.
  • Request an extension to the repair deadline.: A deadline extension request is not assigned.
  • Arrange a town hall for every resident.: A town hall is not assigned.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...