- You will watch a 2-minute video. Then 8 questions will appear.
- Choose the best way to answer each question.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: How to set guided tour pricing for the Sea to Sky routes in Squamish for next season.
Why this is correct: Rising permit and insurance costs prompt a discussion of guided-tour prices for next season. The whole talk stays focused on price increases and options.
Tips: For main issue questions, focus on the first speaker and repeated themes.
Why the other options are wrong:
- How to recruit new tour guides for the upcoming season.: Hiring new guides is not the decision; extra guide training is discussed only as a condition of higher premium-tour prices.
- Whether to expand tour routes into Whistler.: They never discuss expanding tours to Whistler. Whistler is only mentioned to compare prices.
- Whether to cancel guided tours due to declining demand.: Demand is described as solid, and they debate prices rather than cancelling tours.
Correct Answer: Repeat Lower Mainland guests, especially families, are price-sensitive.
Why this is correct: Lower Mainland repeat guests, especially summer-booking families, are price-sensitive and could be lost after a poorly handled increase.
Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The BC Parks permit might be lost.: Losing the permit is not the concern stated.
- Competitors are already proven to offer cheaper tours.: Competitors already being cheaper is not established.
- Tour costs have decreased this year.: Costs decreasing contradicts the reported increases.
Correct Answer: BC Parks permit fees and insurance costs have increased.
Why this is correct: New BC Parks permit fees and an insurance hike mean operating costs have increased.
Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The fees have stayed the same for three years.: Unchanged fees for three years are not reported.
- Lower fees have been negotiated with BC Parks.: Negotiating lower fees is not the reported change.
- Insurance costs have fallen substantially.: The opening reports an insurance hike, rather than falling insurance costs.
Correct Answer: Check competitors’ prices for similar programmes in Whistler.
Why this is correct: Check competitors in Whistler charging for similar programmes before committing to specific numbers.
Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Review last year’s financial reports in detail.: A detailed review of last year’s accounts is not the comparison requested.
- Consult BC Parks about permitted price ranges.: A permitted-price consultation with BC Parks is not requested.
- Survey repeat guests about willingness to pay.: A willingness-to-pay survey is not the requested comparison.
Correct Answer: Keep last year’s prices for school-board bookings.
Why this is correct: Keep last year’s rates for school-board bookings while considering the five-per-cent increase.
Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Apply the increase only to new customers.: New-customers-only scope is not the condition.
- Charge Squamish residents double.: Charging Squamish residents double is not proposed.
- Absorb the insurance increase entirely.: Absorbing all insurance costs is not the condition.
Correct Answer: Increase premium-tour prices closer to eight per cent with extra guide training.
Why this is correct: An increase closer to eight per cent is supported for premium tours if guides receive extra training to justify what customers pay.
Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Offer premium tours free as a promotion.: Free premium tours are not proposed.
- Cancel all premium sunrise trips.: Cancelling sunrise trips is not proposed.
- Price premium tours ten per cent above standard.: Ten per cent above standard is not the stated premium increase.
Correct Answer: Squamish residents.
Why this is correct: A local discount for Squamish residents is suggested alongside a modest five-per-cent across-the-board increase.
Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Tourists staying in Whistler.: Whistler tourists are not the local-discount group.
- First-time international visitors.: First-time international visitors are not the local residents named.
- Only company employees.: Only company employees are not the proposed beneficiaries.
Correct Answer: Each person will do research and compare notes next time.
Why this is correct: After the suggestion to check competitors before committing to numbers, the last turn proposes research and comparing notes next time. No provisional price increase is adopted.
Tips: Listen for the action stated in the closing exchange.
Why the other options are wrong:
- They will implement a ten per cent increase across all tours immediately.: Ten per cent is called too much, and no immediate across-the-board increase is adopted.
- They will hire a consultant to set the final pricing.: Hiring a pricing consultant is not proposed.
- They will freeze prices at last year's levels for the entire season.: Keeping last year's rates for school-board bookings is a possible condition, not a freeze for every tour throughout the season.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation