- You will watch a 2-minute video. Then 8 questions will appear.
- Choose the best way to answer each question.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: Whether to replace the carpeted hallways with hard flooring.
Why this is correct: The opening describes worn, dirty hallway carpets, followed by a proposal to switch to hard flooring. The later concerns about noise, upfront cost, and cleaning all relate to that replacement. This shows the main topic is about changing the flooring.
Tips: For main issue questions, focus on the first speaker and the meeting goal.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Whether to increase strata fees to cover general maintenance.: The focus stays on flooring choices. The contingency fund is discussed as a limit on the project; increasing strata fees for general maintenance is not proposed.
- Whether to repaint the hallways in the building.: The proposed change is from carpet to hard flooring. Repainting the hallways is not discussed.
- Whether to add elevators to the building.: Noise and cleaning are discussed in relation to hallway floor materials. Adding elevators is not proposed.
Correct Answer: The person on the left says it would be easier to clean and last longer than carpet.
Why this is correct: The person on the left says hard flooring would be easier to clean and last longer. The person on the left cites satisfied nearby buildings as supporting experience.
Tips: When asked why, listen for because style explanations.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The person on the left believes it will increase property values in Metro Vancouver.: Property-value increases are not the person on the left's stated reason.
- The person on the left wants the building to match newer developments in Coquitlam.: The person on the left cites others' experience rather than a wish to copy newer developments for appearance.
- The person on the left has a personal connection to a flooring supplier in the area.: A personal connection with the supplier is not stated as the person on the left's reason.
Correct Answer: Footsteps could echo in hallways that are quiet with carpet.
Why this is correct: The person in the centre says they are uneasy about noise. They explain footsteps could echo and neighbours might complain.
Tips: For concern questions, listen for words like uneasy or worried.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Removing carpet would make voices carry between floors.: The person in the centre identifies echoing footsteps in the hallways, not voices carrying between floors.
- The new flooring would make elevator equipment louder.: Increased elevator-equipment noise is not the person in the centre's stated concern.
- Cleaning the new floor would create machine noise every morning.: Daily cleaning-machine noise is not the person in the centre's stated concern.
Correct Answer: The person on the left says proper sound underlay can be installed and it meets B.C. building guidelines.
Why this is correct: The person on the left reports that proper sound underlay can manage the noise and says it meets B.C. building guidelines.
Tips: For condition questions, listen for if or would agree.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The person on the left proposes limiting hallway use to certain hours of the day.: Restricted hallway-use hours are not proposed.
- The person on the left suggests using thick area rugs in the hallways instead.: Area rugs are not the person on the left's solution.
- The person on the left recommends switching to a softer type of carpet instead.: Softer carpet is not the person on the left's proposal.
Correct Answer: The contingency fund is limited, and the person in the centre does not want one project to drain it.
Why this is correct: The person in the centre worries that replacing all floors would be expensive and could consume their limited contingency fund.
Tips: Follow the scope of the question and distinguish the stated point from other suggestions.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The strata council can apply for a provincial renovation grant.: A provincial grant is not reported.
- The flooring supplier is offering a limited-time bulk discount.: A bulk supplier discount is not reported.
- Residents would pay less in monthly strata fees immediately.: An immediate fee reduction is not reported.
Correct Answer: It is higher than re-carpeting, but maintenance costs would likely drop over time.
Why this is correct: The preliminary estimate is higher than re-carpeting. The discussion contrasts that higher initial cost with fewer deep cleanings and replacements, which would reduce maintenance costs over time.
Tips: Listen to how the speaker describes the estimate.
Why the other options are wrong:
- It is roughly the same as re-carpeting the entire building.: The estimate is described as higher, rather than roughly the same as re-carpeting.
- It exceeds the annual budget and requires a special levy.: An exceeded annual budget and required special levy are not stated.
- It is lower than expected and well within the contingency fund.: The estimate is higher than re-carpeting; it is not described as lower than expected or safely within the contingency fund.
Correct Answer: Cleaning costs.
Why this is correct: The person on the left says testing first would allow a direct comparison of cleaning costs.
Tips: Listen for what they could compare if they test the flooring first.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Flooring purchase prices among suppliers.: Supplier purchase prices are not the comparison the person on the left explicitly identifies.
- Noise levels inside residents' units.: Noise is an earlier concern, but the person on the left explicitly names cleaning costs as the direct comparison from a test.
- Replacement costs for individual apartment floors.: Individual-apartment replacement costs are not the comparison the person on the left identifies.
Correct Answer: Gather more information and reconvene.
Why this is correct: The discussion ends with a clear plan: gather more information and reconvene. The idea is not rejected. It is still moving forward. That progress concerns information gathering. They do not commit to the whole building yet.
Tips: Use the actual closing response to identify the next step.
Why the other options are wrong:
- They will proceed with a full building replacement immediately.: A full upgrade is clearly not approved.
- They will re-carpet the hallways instead of switching to hard flooring.: Re-carpeting is used as a cost comparison, rather than chosen as the final plan.
- They will table the discussion until the next annual general meeting.: The closing calls for more information and another discussion, rather than tabling the issue until the annual general meeting.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation