- You will watch a 2-minute video. Then 8 questions will appear.
- Choose the best way to answer each question.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: Whether to invest contingency funds in a rooftop patio or additional storage lockers.
Why this is correct: The discussion compares a rooftop patio with storage lockers and asks what the contingency fund can handle. This shows the main topic is choosing between these two options. No final choice is needed to answer this question.
Tips: For main issue questions, focus on the first speaker and the meeting goal.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Whether to renovate the lobby or upgrade the parking garage.: Lobby work and a parking-garage upgrade are not the two spending proposals; parking spaces are a constraint on installing lockers.
- Whether to increase monthly strata fees for all residents.: No one talks about raising strata fees. The discussion is about using existing contingency funds.
- Whether to allow short-term rentals in the building.: Short-term rentals are not proposed; the competing amenities are outdoor space and storage.
Correct Answer: Residents have repeatedly requested shared outdoor space, and relaxed noise by-laws make it more practical.
Why this is correct: Residents repeatedly request shared outdoor space, and relaxed daytime noise by-laws make a rooftop patio more practical.
Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- It is significantly cheaper than installing storage lockers.: The patio is not said to be significantly cheaper than lockers.
- It would generate rental income from private events.: Private-event rental revenue is not claimed.
- The building's insurance company has recommended it.: Insurer recommendation is not given.
Correct Answer: Insurance premiums might rise with a rooftop amenity.
Why this is correct: A rooftop amenity might increase insurance premiums.
Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Insurance would cover construction but exclude all later patio use.: Exclusion of all later patio use from coverage is not claimed.
- Every resident would need to buy a separate policy for the patio.: Separate policies for every resident are not mentioned.
- The current building policy already excludes every outdoor amenity.: An existing exclusion of every outdoor amenity is not reported; the stated risk is higher premiums.
Correct Answer: People keep emailing about bikes and seasonal gear cluttering hallways.
Why this is correct: Bikes and seasonal gear clutter the hallways, leading to repeated complaints and a need to address storage.
Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Residents say the storage lockers are too far from their apartments.: Distance from apartments is not the storage complaint in the emails.
- Residents complain that their lockers have been rented to another company.: Renting residents’ lockers to another company is not reported.
- There are more empty lockers than residents need.: The problem is clutter and demand for storage, rather than a surplus of empty lockers.
Correct Answer: Install lockers without reducing parking spaces.
Why this is correct: Storage is preferred only if parking spaces are not reduced. The speaker does not want to exchange a storage problem for a parking problem.
Tips: Requirements are often stated very directly in one sentence.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Require a rise in all residents’ strata fees.: Higher strata fees are not the storage condition stated.
- Install all lockers on the roof.: Roof-only installation is not required.
- Reserve the lockers only for visitors.: Visitor-only use is not the storage condition.
Correct Answer: Cap ongoing maintenance costs for a smaller patio.
Why this is correct: A smaller patio could be supported as long as ongoing maintenance costs are capped.
Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Split the budget equally between both projects.: Equal budget division between both projects is not promised.
- Delay the project for a year.: A one-year delay is not the condition stated.
- Ask residents to contribute additional funds.: Additional resident contributions are not requested.
Correct Answer: Construction could finish before winter if they move quickly.
Why this is correct: Construction could finish before winter if the group moves quickly. Waiting is said to cost a whole year.
Tips: Timing reasons often include months or seasons.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The patio should open in time for a holiday celebration.: A holiday opening date is not given.
- Construction should be delayed until next spring.: Waiting until spring is not advocated in this turn.
- The project should wait until the rainy season is over.: Waiting until the rainy season ends contradicts the immediate timing argument.
Correct Answer: Get cost quotes and use them to decide how to proceed.
Why this is correct: The closing proposes getting quotes and going from there. This means no final choice is made now.
Tips: Outcome questions focus on what happens after the meeting.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Ask the property manager to choose the better option.: The property manager is not assigned to choose between the projects.
- Hire an architect to design both the patio and the storage lockers.: Hiring an architect to design both projects is not proposed.
- Vote immediately on which project to fund.: An immediate vote is not proposed; the next step is to get quotes.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation