- You will watch a 2-minute video. Then 8 questions will appear.
- Choose the best way to answer each question.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: Offering compressed four-day work weeks during July and August.
Why this is correct: The opening asks about offering four-day weeks during July and August. Later proposals cover staggered days, a pilot and optional participation, but the central proposal remains compressed summer work weeks.
Tips: For main proposal questions, focus on the opening and the final summary.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Closing the office every Friday throughout the year.: The speakers never talk about making it permanent. They only mention July and August and a pilot. Staggering days off is suggested so the office remains open five days.
- Switching to permanent remote work during the summer.: Remote work is not proposed; the alternatives concern arranging existing staff’s working days and hours.
- Reducing staff hours to avoid summer overtime costs.: The discussion considers longer daily hours, a ten-hour cap and HR approval, not reducing total staff hours to avoid overtime.
Correct Answer: Improve morale by easing summer childcare and commuting challenges.
Why this is correct: They could improve morale by easing summer childcare and commuting challenges.
Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Reduce company electricity costs.: Electricity savings are not the benefit stated.
- Provide an extra day for professional development.: Personal development courses are not the rationale given.
- Align with a new national policy.: A national policy change is not cited.
Correct Answer: That client coverage will suffer if phones go unanswered on Fridays.
Why this is correct: Phones and urgent requests still need coverage; the office cannot be unavailable every Friday during summer.
Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- That employees will lose income due to fewer paid hours.: Reduced paid income is not the concern raised.
- That the building lease does not allow reduced operating days.: A lease restriction is not cited.
- That summer heat makes longer daily shifts uncomfortable.: Summer heat discomfort is not the concern stated.
Correct Answer: Staggering days off so the office stays open five days a week.
Why this is correct: Stagger days off, with some staff taking Fridays and others Mondays, so the office remains open all five days.
Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Ask clients to use email instead of phone.: Switching all clients to email is not proposed.
- Redirecting all Friday calls to an automated answering service.: An automated Friday answering service is not proposed.
- Hiring temporary staff to cover Fridays during the summer.: Temporary Friday hires are not proposed.
Correct Answer: Weekly hours above forty-four could have cost implications under Ontario’s Employment Standards Act.
Why this is correct: Hours above forty-four in a week are said to have cost implications under Ontario’s Employment Standards Act, prompting a need for HR confirmation.
Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The Canada Labour Code prohibits four-day weeks for federally regulated workers.: A federal prohibition on four-day weeks is not cited.
- The collective bargaining agreement does not permit schedule changes.: A collective-agreement ban is not cited.
- Workers' compensation does not cover injuries during extended shifts.: Loss of workers’ compensation for extended shifts is not claimed.
Correct Answer: That daily hours are capped at ten and HR confirms compliance.
Why this is correct: Daily hours should be capped at ten, with HR confirming compliance before the pilot starts.
Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- That senior management guarantees no layoffs during the trial.: A no-layoff guarantee is not required.
- That the pilot runs for a full year before any review.: A full-year trial is not required.
- That all team members must participate to ensure fairness.: Compulsory participation contradicts the later optional proposal.
Correct Answer: Optional rather than mandatory for staff.
Why this is correct: The proposal is to make the compressed work week optional rather than mandatory because some staff prefer their regular hours. A response calls this reasonable, but the source does not establish explicit agreement from all three speakers.
Tips: Distinguish what is proposed from a claim that everyone has agreed.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Mandatory for all employees to simplify scheduling.: Mandatory participation is expressly contrasted with the optional proposal.
- Limited to employees without client-facing responsibilities.: The proposal does not limit eligibility to staff without client-facing duties.
- Available only to employees with children under twelve.: Children under twelve are not an eligibility requirement.
Correct Answer: Gather more information and reconvene.
Why this is correct: The group will gather more information and reconvene.
Tips: Listen to the closing remark for the next action actually stated.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Implement the schedule immediately without more information.: Immediate implementation without more information is not announced.
- Send a final recommendation without further checks.: Sending a recommendation without more checks is not announced.
- Cancel the compressed-week proposal.: Cancellation is not the closing action.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation