Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
CELPIP Practice Listening: Discussion ID: #61458 Hard Markets and Craft Fairs at Akinsdale Hall
Instructions ›
  • You will watch a 2-minute video. Then 8 questions will appear.
  • Choose the best way to answer each question.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.

Correct Answer: Whether to host a farmers market or a craft fair for the July weekend event.

Why this is correct: The July weekend event is framed as a choice between a farmers market and a craft fair. Logistics, funding and weather are considerations for those alternatives. This shows the main decision.

Tips: For main idea questions, focus on the first speaker and the meeting goal.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • Whether to cancel the July event due to budget constraints.: They discuss how to make an event work, including an existing grant, rather than cancelling it.
  • Whether to renovate the Akinsdale hall before the July event.: The hall is the venue; renovating it is not proposed.
  • Whether to invite vendors from outside Alberta.: Inviting farms from Sturgeon County is a secondary vendor idea, not a decision about vendors from outside Alberta.

Correct Answer: Build on St. Albert’s local-produce reputation and offer fresh food close to home.

Why this is correct: St. Albert has a strong reputation for local produce, and neighbours would appreciate fresh food close to home.

Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • Attract tourists from Edmonton.: Attracting Edmonton tourists is not the stated local reason.
  • Give a committee member a place to sell personal produce.: A committee member selling personal produce is not the rationale reported.
  • Organise it more cheaply than a craft fair.: Lower organisational cost than a craft fair is not claimed.

Correct Answer: Food vendors require permits, refrigeration and health inspections.

Why this is correct: Food sales require permits, refrigeration and health inspections, making a farmers market harder to organise than craft tables.

Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • A farmers market would not attract enough visitors.: Insufficient visitors are not the logistics concern.
  • The grant cannot be used for food events.: A grant prohibition on food events is not reported.
  • Local farmers would refuse to participate.: Unwilling local farmers are not the stated difficulty.

Correct Answer: About five thousand dollars from the City of St. Albert.

Why this is correct: The discussion explicitly mentions about five thousand dollars from the City of St. Albert grant. Both the approximate amount and the municipal source are stated; it does not require identifying the speaker.

Tips: Match the amount and the funding organisation together; a distractor can change either detail.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • About eight thousand dollars from a corporate sponsor.: The available grant is about five thousand dollars from the City of St. Albert, rather than eight thousand dollars from a corporate sponsor.
  • About ten thousand dollars from the provincial government.: Both details differ: the source gives about five thousand dollars and names the City of St. Albert, rather than ten thousand dollars from the provincial government.
  • About three thousand dollars from private donations.: The stated support is a municipal grant of about five thousand dollars, rather than three thousand dollars in private donations.

Correct Answer: Capping the number of food vendors to avoid volunteer burnout.

Why this is correct: Capping the number of food vendors is suggested after the concern about volunteer burnout and demanding food-safety work. It is a workload suggestion, rather than an express condition for supporting the event.

Tips: Distinguish a practical suggestion from an explicit condition for agreement.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • Hiring a professional event planner to manage logistics.: Hiring a professional planner is not suggested.
  • Holding the event indoors regardless of weather.: Moving crafts indoors is discussed as a weather advantage, but holding the farmers market indoors regardless of weather is not the workload suggestion.
  • Restricting all vendors to St. Albert only.: The vendor list could include farms from Sturgeon County; a St. Albert-only restriction is not suggested.

Correct Answer: Crafts give flexibility because everything can be moved indoors if it rains.

Why this is correct: Crafts can be moved indoors if the weather turns bad, while moving produce is more difficult.

Tips: Connect the exact proposal to the condition or reason stated for it.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • Craft fairs generate higher stall fees than farmers markets.: Higher craft stall fees are not the advantage claimed.
  • Craft fairs attract larger crowds during the summer.: Larger summer craft crowds are not claimed.
  • Craft fairs require no insurance coverage.: An insurance exemption is not claimed.

Correct Answer: Enough vendors commit early.

Why this is correct: Permit management is offered if enough vendors commit early.

Tips: Connect the offer of help to the condition immediately attached to it.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • The City grant is doubled.: Doubling the grant is not required.
  • Every food vendor also sells crafts.: Food vendors also selling crafts is not required.
  • Every vendor must be from St. Albert.: A St. Albert-only vendor restriction is not set; Sturgeon County farms are considered.

Correct Answer: Send around a summary so everyone is on the same page.

Why this is correct: The closing promises to send around a summary so everyone is on the same page. It does not announce a final choice of event or a dated permit-and-insurance task.

Tips: Match the closing action to its exact stated purpose.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • Book the venue and confirm vendors immediately.: It is not fully approved. The closing promises a summary, rather than immediate venue booking and vendor confirmation.
  • Cancel the event and revisit the idea next year.: The idea is not rejected. It is still being considered. Cancelling the event until next year is not the stated next step.
  • Hold a public survey before deciding.: A public survey is not the stated closing next step.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...