- You will watch a 2-minute video. Then 8 questions will appear.
- Choose the best way to answer each question.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: To develop a renovation plan for the kitchen at the Scarborough Civic Centre.
Why this is correct: The opening identifies a renovation plan for the Scarborough Civic Centre kitchen. The discussion develops priorities, phases, estimates and approval limits for that work.
Tips: Separate the reason facilities are needed from the work the meeting is planning.
Why the other options are wrong:
- To decide whether to close the community kitchen permanently.: Permanent closure is not proposed; they plan upgrades so the kitchen can continue serving programmes.
- To plan a community cooking competition at the civic centre.: A cooking competition is not proposed; cooking programmes explain why the facilities need work.
- To hire new staff for the cooking programs.: Hiring new programme staff is not the purpose; the debate concerns equipment and renovation costs.
Correct Answer: The ventilation system has not been properly serviced, and two of six burners on the main stove do not work.
Why this is correct: The reported problems are poorly serviced ventilation and two non-working burners out of six. Both details appear in the description of why running classes has become harder.
Tips: Listen for the details the speaker gives about what is not working.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The cooking equipment was stolen during a break-in.: Theft is not mentioned.
- The kitchen is too small to hold more than five people at a time.: Five-person cap is not mentioned.
- The kitchen lacks running water and basic sanitation facilities.: No running water is not mentioned.
Correct Answer: The person on the right says a full renovation would be too expensive right now.
Why this is correct: A complete renovation could exceed one hundred thousand dollars. The community budget is already stretched by library upgrades, so the scope needs to be realistic.
Tips: Listen for why the speaker asks the group to be realistic.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The person on the right is worried the renovation will take too long and disrupt other programs.: Duration/disruption rationale is not mentioned.
- The person on the right thinks the community does not use the kitchen enough to justify spending.: Low-use rationale is not mentioned.
- The person on the right believes the kitchen should be relocated instead of renovated.: Relocation preference is not mentioned.
Correct Answer: Phasing the work by tackling ventilation and appliances this year and counters and flooring next year.
Why this is correct: The work could be phased: ventilation and appliances this year, followed by counter expansion and flooring next year. This spreads the work across budget cycles.
Tips: Keep the phases and their contents in the correct order.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Using volunteer labour to reduce contractor expenses.: Volunteer labour is not mentioned.
- Applying for a federal infrastructure grant.: Federal grant is not mentioned.
- Scaling down the renovation to only replace the stove.: Stove-only scope is not mentioned.
Correct Answer: Volunteers are hand-washing everything, which is a health and safety concern flagged by the Toronto Public Health inspector.
Why this is correct: Hand-washing everything has been flagged as a health and safety concern by the Toronto Public Health inspector. That is the stated reason for putting the industrial dishwasher in phase one.
Tips: Listen for the problem the speaker says must be fixed first.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The current dishwasher uses too much water and increases utility costs.: Water-usage cost is not mentioned.
- The cooking programs cannot operate without it.: Current programs already operate, so absolute cannot-operate is unsupported.
- A new dishwasher would allow the kitchen to serve more people at events.: More-event capacity rationale is not mentioned.
Correct Answer: The inspection concern changes the position to supporting the dishwasher as a top priority.
Why this is correct: Learning about the inspection issue changes the response to the dishwasher. The compliance concern leads to support for putting it at the top of the priority list.
Tips: Listen to the speaker's full reply, not only the first sentence.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Waiting until next year's budget to address the issue.: The dishwasher is moved to the top of the phase-one priorities.
- Closing the kitchen until all issues are resolved.: The discussion continues with staged renovation; closing the kitchen is not proposed.
- Remaining opposed to spending any money on the kitchen.: The response explicitly supports prioritising the dishwasher, which contradicts continued complete opposition to spending.
Correct Answer: Adjustable counters for wheelchair users.
Why this is correct: Counters that are too high for wheelchair users lead to a suggestion for adjustable counters in phase one. Their inclusion remains subject to the budget.
Tips: Identify the proposed accessibility feature while retaining any condition.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Widening the doorways to accommodate mobility devices.: Door widening is not mentioned.
- Adding Braille labels to all kitchen equipment.: Braille labels are not mentioned.
- Installing a wheelchair ramp at the kitchen entrance.: Ramp is not mentioned.
Correct Answer: Three quotes must be obtained, and the work must stay within the sixty-thousand-dollar single-phase approval limit.
Why this is correct: Phase one requires three quotes and must remain within the sixty-thousand-dollar approval limit. The later accessibility addition is also conditional on staying below that threshold.
Tips: Check each option against the conditions this speaker actually states.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The city must guarantee additional funding for phase two.: Phase-two funding guarantee is not mentioned.
- At least half the funding must come from external sources.: Half external funding is not mentioned.
- The total must not exceed one hundred thousand dollars.: $100,000 limit conflicts with stated $60,000.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation