Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
CELPIP Practice Listening: Discussion ID: #61497 Easy The Kitchen at Scarborough Civic Centre
Instructions ›
  • You will watch a 2-minute video. Then 8 questions will appear.
  • Choose the best way to answer each question.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.

Correct Answer: To develop a renovation plan for the kitchen at the Scarborough Civic Centre.

Why this is correct: The opening identifies a renovation plan for the Scarborough Civic Centre kitchen. The discussion develops priorities, phases, estimates and approval limits for that work.

Tips: Separate the reason facilities are needed from the work the meeting is planning.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • To decide whether to close the community kitchen permanently.: Permanent closure is not proposed; they plan upgrades so the kitchen can continue serving programmes.
  • To plan a community cooking competition at the civic centre.: A cooking competition is not proposed; cooking programmes explain why the facilities need work.
  • To hire new staff for the cooking programs.: Hiring new programme staff is not the purpose; the debate concerns equipment and renovation costs.

Correct Answer: The ventilation system has not been properly serviced, and two of six burners on the main stove do not work.

Why this is correct: The reported problems are poorly serviced ventilation and two non-working burners out of six. Both details appear in the description of why running classes has become harder.

Tips: Listen for the details the speaker gives about what is not working.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • The cooking equipment was stolen during a break-in.: Theft is not mentioned.
  • The kitchen is too small to hold more than five people at a time.: Five-person cap is not mentioned.
  • The kitchen lacks running water and basic sanitation facilities.: No running water is not mentioned.

Correct Answer: The person on the right says a full renovation would be too expensive right now.

Why this is correct: A complete renovation could exceed one hundred thousand dollars. The community budget is already stretched by library upgrades, so the scope needs to be realistic.

Tips: Listen for why the speaker asks the group to be realistic.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • The person on the right is worried the renovation will take too long and disrupt other programs.: Duration/disruption rationale is not mentioned.
  • The person on the right thinks the community does not use the kitchen enough to justify spending.: Low-use rationale is not mentioned.
  • The person on the right believes the kitchen should be relocated instead of renovated.: Relocation preference is not mentioned.

Correct Answer: Phasing the work by tackling ventilation and appliances this year and counters and flooring next year.

Why this is correct: The work could be phased: ventilation and appliances this year, followed by counter expansion and flooring next year. This spreads the work across budget cycles.

Tips: Keep the phases and their contents in the correct order.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • Using volunteer labour to reduce contractor expenses.: Volunteer labour is not mentioned.
  • Applying for a federal infrastructure grant.: Federal grant is not mentioned.
  • Scaling down the renovation to only replace the stove.: Stove-only scope is not mentioned.

Correct Answer: Volunteers are hand-washing everything, which is a health and safety concern flagged by the Toronto Public Health inspector.

Why this is correct: Hand-washing everything has been flagged as a health and safety concern by the Toronto Public Health inspector. That is the stated reason for putting the industrial dishwasher in phase one.

Tips: Listen for the problem the speaker says must be fixed first.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • The current dishwasher uses too much water and increases utility costs.: Water-usage cost is not mentioned.
  • The cooking programs cannot operate without it.: Current programs already operate, so absolute cannot-operate is unsupported.
  • A new dishwasher would allow the kitchen to serve more people at events.: More-event capacity rationale is not mentioned.

Correct Answer: The inspection concern changes the position to supporting the dishwasher as a top priority.

Why this is correct: Learning about the inspection issue changes the response to the dishwasher. The compliance concern leads to support for putting it at the top of the priority list.

Tips: Listen to the speaker's full reply, not only the first sentence.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • Waiting until next year's budget to address the issue.: The dishwasher is moved to the top of the phase-one priorities.
  • Closing the kitchen until all issues are resolved.: The discussion continues with staged renovation; closing the kitchen is not proposed.
  • Remaining opposed to spending any money on the kitchen.: The response explicitly supports prioritising the dishwasher, which contradicts continued complete opposition to spending.

Correct Answer: Adjustable counters for wheelchair users.

Why this is correct: Counters that are too high for wheelchair users lead to a suggestion for adjustable counters in phase one. Their inclusion remains subject to the budget.

Tips: Identify the proposed accessibility feature while retaining any condition.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • Widening the doorways to accommodate mobility devices.: Door widening is not mentioned.
  • Adding Braille labels to all kitchen equipment.: Braille labels are not mentioned.
  • Installing a wheelchair ramp at the kitchen entrance.: Ramp is not mentioned.

Correct Answer: Three quotes must be obtained, and the work must stay within the sixty-thousand-dollar single-phase approval limit.

Why this is correct: Phase one requires three quotes and must remain within the sixty-thousand-dollar approval limit. The later accessibility addition is also conditional on staying below that threshold.

Tips: Check each option against the conditions this speaker actually states.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • The city must guarantee additional funding for phase two.: Phase-two funding guarantee is not mentioned.
  • At least half the funding must come from external sources.: Half external funding is not mentioned.
  • The total must not exceed one hundred thousand dollars.: $100,000 limit conflicts with stated $60,000.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...