Why the other options are wrong:

• His friend recommended a new brand.: A friend's recommendation is not mentioned.
• He plans to go on a winter camping trip.: He is planning summer hikes, not a winter camping trip.
• He needs boots for work in Squamish.: He is hiking for recreation, not for work.

Correct Answer: It offers better ankle support.

Why this is correct: The employee describes the mid-cut boot as having good ankle support, while the low-cut shoe does not support the ankle as much. Better ankle support is the stated advantage.

Why the other options are wrong:

• It is designed only for easy trails.: It is not designed only for easy trails - it works well on rocky terrain.
• It is the lightest option in the store.: The low-cut shoe is lighter, not the mid-cut boot.
• It dries faster after rain.: The employee does not say the mid-cut boot dries faster.

Correct Answer: Only the mid-cut boot has a Gore-Tex lining.

Why this is correct: The employee says the mid-cut boot uses a Gore-Tex lining that keeps water out better. The low-cut shoe is only water-resistant and feet could get damp in heavy rain. Only the mid-cut has Gore-Tex.

Why the other options are wrong:

• Waterproofing is not important in Squamish.: Waterproofing matters in Squamish because of the rain.
• Both options are fully waterproof.: The low-cut shoe is water-resistant, not fully waterproof, so they are not the same.
• The low-cut shoe is better in heavy rain.: The employee says the opposite - the mid-cut boot is better in heavy rain.

Correct Answer: It fits his budget and local trail conditions.

Why this is correct: The employee says the mid-cut boot is under $200, fitting the man's budget, and is better suited to wet Squamish conditions. Both the price and the local weather make it the right choice.

Why the other options are wrong:

• It is designed for winter conditions.: Winter conditions are not discussed.
• It is the most popular model in the shop.: Popularity is not mentioned as a factor.
• It is lighter than the low-cut shoe.: The mid-cut boot is heavier, not lighter, than the low-cut shoe.

Correct Answer: It costs less than the mid-cut boot.

Why this is correct: The low-cut hiking shoe costs $149, while the mid-cut boot costs $189. The shoe is $40 cheaper than the boot.

Why the other options are wrong:

• It provides stronger ankle support.: The mid-cut boot provides stronger ankle support, not the low-cut shoe.
• It is available in a wide fit.: Only the mid-cut boot comes in a wide fit.
• It has a stiffer sole for rocky terrain.: The mid-cut boot has the stiffer sole, not the low-cut shoe.

Correct Answer: Try on the mid-cut boot in his size.

Why this is correct: The employee offers to bring a size nine in wide fit so the man can try them on and walk around the store. The man agrees, so trying on the mid-cut boot is his next step.

Why the other options are wrong:

• Buy the low-cut shoe immediately.: He chose the mid-cut boot, not the low-cut shoe.
• Leave the store to check other shops.: He seems happy with the advice and does not mention leaving.
• Ask for a discount at the cashier.: He does not ask for a discount.