- You will hear a news item once. It is about 1.5 minutes long.
- Then 5 questions will appear.
- Choose the best way to complete each statement from the drop-down menu.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: a protest opposing a proposed pipeline route.
Why this is correct: The report describes hundreds of people gathering to protest a proposed natural gas pipeline route in northern British Columbia. The protest, the pipeline details, and the different viewpoints are all covered.
Why the other options are wrong:
- job forecasts in the energy sector.: Job forecasts in the energy sector are mentioned briefly but are not the main topic.
- traffic disruptions from police checkpoints.: Traffic disruption is a detail of the protest, not the main story. The report links the delays to the rally and says checkpoints followed blocked access roads; it does not attribute the delays specifically to police checkpoints.
- the approval of a new export terminal.: The approval of a new export terminal is not the topic - the pipeline is still under environmental assessment.
Correct Answer: cross Indigenous cultural and hunting lands.
Why this is correct: The transcript says organisers say the pipeline route passes through areas used for hunting, fishing, and cultural ceremonies by the Wet'suwet'en Nation. This is why protesters gathered near Smithers.
Why the other options are wrong:
- require demolishing nearby homes.: Demolishing nearby homes is not mentioned as a concern.
- block public access to coastal areas.: Blocking public access to coastal areas is not the stated reason.
- cause flooding along the highway.: Flooding along the highway is not discussed.
Correct Answer: without consent from traditional leadership.
Why this is correct: Hereditary chief Na'Moks said the route was selected without the free, prior, and informed consent of traditional leadership. He specifically mentioned that decisions were made before meaningful consultation began.
Why the other options are wrong:
- without involving elected band councils.: He did not say elected band councils were left out - the company actually signed agreements with them. His concern was about traditional leadership.
- before environmental reviews were completed.: He focused on consent, not on whether environmental reviews were completed.
- to prioritize outside construction workers.: Prioritizing outside construction workers is not what he mentioned.
Correct Answer: early next year.
Why this is correct: The transcript says the B.C. Energy Regulator confirmed that a final decision on the pipeline's environmental assessment is not expected until early next year.
Why the other options are wrong:
- by October this year.: October this year is when a court hearing about an injunction is scheduled, not the environmental decision.
- before the injunction hearing.: The hearing is scheduled for October, while the assessment decision is not expected until early next year. The expected decision is therefore not before the hearing.
- later this summer.: Later this summer is not mentioned as the timeline for the decision.
Correct Answer: balanced and fact based.
Why this is correct: The report presents views from both sides - the protesters, hereditary chief, the pipeline company, and provincial officials. It gives facts without taking sides, making it balanced and fact-based.
Why the other options are wrong:
- strongly supportive of the company.: The report does not strongly support the company - it presents both the company's position and the protesters' concerns.
- critical of police actions.: The report does not criticize police actions - it simply reports what police did.
- dismissive of Indigenous concerns.: The report does not dismiss Indigenous concerns - it gives them significant coverage.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation