- You will hear a news item once. It is about 1.5 minutes long.
- Then 5 questions will appear.
- Choose the best way to complete each statement from the drop-down menu.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: the history of the computer mouse.
Why this is correct: The report follows the computer mouse from its beginnings in the 1960s through its prototype, demonstration and patent. It does not establish a fifty-year span.
Why the other options are wrong:
- options for reading glasses.: Reading glasses are not discussed; the account concerns a computer input device.
- the evolution of the computer keyboard.: The prototype and patent described belong to the mouse, not the keyboard.
- a ten-year history of computing.: The account gives mouse-development milestones, not a ten-year history of computing.
Correct Answer: 1964.
Why this is correct: The report dates English's first mouse prototype to 1964. The earlier date, 1962, belongs to Engelbart's framework report rather than the prototype.
Why the other options are wrong:
- 1960.: The passage places the beginnings in the 1960s, but the specific prototype year is 1964, not 1960.
- 1962.: The year 1962 is when Engelbart published the conceptual framework. The prototype came two years later.
- 1988.: The report does not date the first prototype to 1988; it explicitly gives 1964.
Correct Answer: Mother of All Demos.
Why this is correct: The report says Engelbart's 90-minute public demonstration was dubbed the mother of all demos. This is the reported nickname of the demonstration.
Why the other options are wrong:
- the best demo of all time.: The best demo of all time is a statement of praise, but it is not the nickname the report gives.
- the big daddy of demos.: The big daddy of demos is a different nickname from the one stated in the report.
- a demo worth its salt.: A demo worth its salt is not the reported name. The passage specifically uses mother of all demos.
Correct Answer: carved wooden casing.
Why this is correct: The first prototype is described as having a carved wooden casing. The question asks about that casing, so the material and construction must both match.
Why the other options are wrong:
- metallic body.: The casing was made of carved wood, not metal.
- plastic body and rubber roller.: The report does not describe a plastic body and rubber roller; it describes a wooden casing containing wheels.
- gold plated case.: A gold-plated case is not described. The stated casing material is wood.
Correct Answer: space for only one button.
Why this is correct: The report explicitly says there was space for only one button on the first mouse. That rules out answers describing several buttons.
Why the other options are wrong:
- three buttons with limited usability.: Three buttons conflicts with the stated space for only one button.
- no roller but a fixed mechanism.: The prototype used a wheel or wheels to turn mouse movement into cursor movement. It was not described as a fixed mechanism with no roller.
- five buttons with various tasks.: Five buttons conflicts with the stated limit of one button.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation