- You will hear a report once. It is about 3 minutes long.
- Then 6 questions will appear.
- Choose the best way to answer each question from the drop-down menu.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: Healthcare support, government funding, and local influence.
Why this is correct: The speaker gives a personal view of the best response. It joins three things: caring healthcare, funding from higher levels of government, and respect for local voices.
Tips: Listen for the part where the speaker gives a personal opinion, and note each thing the speaker wants to combine.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Healthcare support, government funding, and outside political direction.: Healthcare and funding are right. But the speaker wants respect for local voices, not direction from outside politicians.
- Personal responsibility, community resilience, and local influence.: Personal responsibility and resilience come from some residents. The speaker's own list starts with healthcare and funding.
- Personal responsibility, community resilience, and outside political direction.: Personal responsibility belongs to some residents, not the speaker. Those residents also criticise outside politicians rather than asking them to lead.
Correct Answer: pushed communities to work together in new ways.
Why this is correct: The speaker says some local leaders see a good side to the crisis. In their view, it pushed communities to work together in new ways.
Tips: Several groups are described. Before you choose, check which group each idea belongs to.
Why the other options are wrong:
- made communities depend on provincial health authorities.: Some Alberta towns did partner with provincial health authorities. But a partnership is working together, not depending on them.
- exposed long-standing gaps in rural health services.: This is the view of local officials and healthcare workers. It is not what the local leaders in the third view believe.
- been oversimplified by outside media and politicians.: Some residents say outside media and politicians oversimplify the problem. The local leaders talk about communities working together instead.
Correct Answer: rural areas are taking up a larger part of emergency work.
Why this is correct: The agency's figures show deaths fell across the country in 2024. But rural areas now account for a growing share of emergency responses.
Tips: When a speaker gives figures, ask yourself what point the figures are used to prove.
Why the other options are wrong:
- the crisis is now easing in rural areas as well as nationally.: Deaths fell nationally, but the figures do not say rural areas are easing. Rural areas now take a growing share of emergency responses.
- small towns can respond quickly because their leaders are close by.: This idea comes from a sociologist, Dr. Pelletier. It is not what the health agency's figures show.
- many small towns have only one clinic for the whole community.: The speaker does say some towns have only one clinic. But that is a general description, not part of the agency's figures.
Correct Answer: Worried, because it may keep tourists away.
Why this is correct: The speaker says small business owners worry about the constant negative headlines. They think these headlines discourage tourism and investment.
Tips: Listen for the verb the speaker uses to describe how this group feels, and for the reason they give.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Hopeful, because it may attract new investment.: Investment is mentioned, but the owners think the headlines discourage it. They are not hopeful about the coverage.
- Relaxed, because most days in town are quiet.: A shop owner does say most days are quiet. The owner says it to complain that outsiders believe crime is out of control.
- Hopeful, because it may bring treatment programmes.: A nurse near Thunder Bay talks about the lack of treatment programmes. The business owners do not say this.
Correct Answer: how outside beliefs about a town can differ from daily life there.
Why this is correct: A shop owner in Nova Scotia says people assume crime is out of control. In fact, most days in the town are quiet.
Tips: Several examples come from different places. Link each place to its story, then ask what that story proves.
Why the other options are wrong:
- how training can prepare residents to respond to overdoses.: Naloxone training is part of the Alberta example. The Nova Scotia conversation is not about training.
- how distance from treatment leads patients to keep returning.: This comes from a nurse in a town outside Thunder Bay, in Ontario. It is not the Nova Scotia example.
- how daily life in a town can match what outsiders believe about it.: The owner says the opposite. Outsiders think crime is out of control, but most days in the town are quiet.
Correct Answer: response faster and the harm stronger.
Why this is correct: Early on, the speaker says closeness can intensify both the harm and the response. Dr. Pelletier adds that small communities adapt quickly when decision-makers are close to people.
Tips: Two different parts of the report say what closeness does. Combine them before you choose.
Why the other options are wrong:
- response faster but the harm smaller.: The faster response is right. But the report says closeness makes the harm stronger, not smaller.
- harm stronger but the response slower.: The stronger harm is right. But Dr. Pelletier says closeness helps small communities adapt quickly, not slowly.
- harm smaller and the response slower.: Both parts are reversed. The report says closeness makes the harm stronger and the response quicker.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation