- You will hear a report once. It is about 3 minutes long.
- Then 6 questions will appear.
- Choose the best way to answer each question from the drop-down menu.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: mainly in places where the lots are rarely used.
Why this is correct: The speaker supports converting some lots, with careful planning. The speaker says parking should not go everywhere, but parks make sense where lots are rarely used.
Tips: Separate the speaker's own view from the ideas of the other groups in the report.
Why the other options are wrong:
- mainly where lots are underused and transit is good.: Another group mentions underused lots or better transit as two separate options. The speaker talks only about lots that are rarely used and adds no transit condition.
- mainly where most residents ask for more parks.: A survey shows many residents want more parks nearby. But the speaker never makes residents' requests the rule for choosing lots.
- mainly as short-term pop-up parks at first.: The pop-up park is one story from a neighbour. The speaker does not say cities should start with short-term parks.
Correct Answer: his weekday customers mostly drive in from other parts of the city.
Why this is correct: The café owner says most of his weekday customers drive in from other parts of the city. So fewer parking spots could hurt his business.
Tips: Listen for the reason a person gives for a worry. Keep it apart from what other people say nearby.
Why the other options are wrong:
- his weekend customers mostly drive in from other parts of the city.: The café owner talks about his weekday customers. He says nothing about weekends.
- his customers mostly live in areas where public transit does not reach.: Areas without good transit are the worried residents' general point about Calgary. The café owner does not say where his customers live.
- his customers mostly come by car with their children after school.: Children after school come from the neighbour's park story. The café owner does not mention children.
Correct Answer: even small parks can lower temperatures during heat waves.
Why this is correct: The planner says that even small parks can lower neighbourhood temperatures during heat waves. That backs up the supporters' point about summer heat.
Tips: Match the named source to the exact claim it supports. Listen for what that person actually said.
Why the other options are wrong:
- even small parks can help manage rainwater after storms.: Managing rainwater is a point the supporters make. The planner talks only about lower temperatures during heat waves.
- even small parks give people places to relax and exercise.: Relaxing and exercising are on the supporters' list of uses for green spaces. The planner does not talk about them.
- even small parks are wanted by most people living nearby.: Wanting parks nearby is a result of the Toronto survey. The planner does not talk about what residents want.
Correct Answer: They could still find parking close to the new park.
Why this is correct: Edmonton turned the lot into a park but kept the nearby parking structures open. So drivers still had places to park close by.
Tips: Think about what the details of an example tell you, even when the speaker does not say it directly.
Why the other options are wrong:
- They had to park farther away than before.: The city kept the nearby parking structures open. So drivers did not have to go farther to park.
- They got new bus routes to replace the lost spaces.: Better transit is one idea from the group that calls the parking argument too simple. The Edmonton example does not mention buses or transit.
- They had filled the old lot on most weekdays.: The lot was rarely full. So drivers had not filled it on most weekdays.
Correct Answer: cautious, and hopeful that practical needs and healthy communities can both be met.
Why this is correct: The speaker asks for careful planning. But the speaker sounds hopeful and says that with balance, we can have both.
Tips: Listen to how the speaker says things, not only to what the speaker says.
Why the other options are wrong:
- cautious, and doubtful that practical needs and healthy communities can both be met.: The speaker is careful but not doubtful. The speaker says clearly that we can have both.
- cautious, and mainly worried about small shops losing their customers.: Worry about shops losing customers belongs to small business owners. The speaker's opinion is not mainly about shops.
- cautious, and impatient with people who are slow to accept change.: Calling the parking argument too simple is what another group does. The speaker does not sound impatient with anyone.
Correct Answer: can bring local people together.
Why this is correct: The neighbour's park quickly became her favourite place. The speaker says it created a sense of community that the parking lot never did.
Tips: Ask yourself which idea a personal story is meant to show.
Why the other options are wrong:
- can help a city manage its rainwater.: Managing rainwater is an environmental point from the supporters. The story is about people, not water.
- can give people a quiet place to relax.: Relaxing is on the supporters' list of uses for parks. The story is about the sense of community, not about rest.
- can bring more customers to local shops.: Shops come up only in the worry about losing customers. The story says nothing about shops.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation