- You will hear a report once. It is about 3 minutes long.
- Then 6 questions will appear.
- Choose the best way to answer each question from the drop-down menu.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: Brain drain is a real concern, but better conditions at home could keep more workers.
Why this is correct: The speaker calls brain drain a real concern but says blaming workers misses the point. Better conditions at home might help more doctors and nurses stay.
Tips: Several groups give their view in this report. Decide which view the speaker gives as their own.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Brain drain is a real concern, but moving abroad is normal and little can be done about it.: Some experts call movement normal, but they say Canada should focus on keeping staff. The report says the problem can be reduced.
- Brain drain is a real concern, but it mostly affects rural and northern communities.: Rural and northern communities are one group's worry. The speaker never says the problem is mostly a rural one.
- Brain drain is a real concern, and governments are to blame rather than the workers.: The speaker says governments could improve conditions. The speaker does not put the blame on governments.
Correct Answer: Canada pays to train workers who may leave just as they are gaining experience.
Why this is correct: This group says Canada invests heavily in training. They find it alarming to lose professionals just as they are gaining experience.
Tips: Several groups talk about workers leaving. Keep each group's reason linked to that group.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Canada pays to train workers who may leave before they finish their residency.: The worry is about losing people just as they are gaining experience. The report talks about newly licensed nurses, not people still in training.
- Canada pays to train workers who may leave because of constant overtime.: Constant overtime comes from the nurse who moved to Australia. That story belongs to people who see leaving as understandable.
- Canada pays to train workers who may leave for higher pay in other countries.: Higher pay is a reason given by people who see leaving as understandable. The serious-threat group does not talk about pay.
Correct Answer: That in some areas, patients must travel far because no specialist is nearby.
Why this is correct: The speaker's neighbour in Thunder Bay travelled over two hours to see a specialist. No one was available locally.
Tips: Keep each example linked to the place and the point it illustrates.
Why the other options are wrong:
- That in some areas, patients may wait months for a new family doctor.: Waiting months for a replacement comes from the family doctor on local radio. The neighbour's story is about travelling to a specialist.
- That in some areas, people in smaller towns worry about getting care on time.: Worry about timely care is a general point from the start of the report. It is not what the neighbour's story shows.
- That in some areas, emergency rooms are already short of staff.: Short-staffed emergency rooms come from the group that sees a serious threat. The neighbour's story is about a specialist.
Correct Answer: Working conditions in Canada that push people away.
Why this is correct: This group says workers leave for better pay, balance and patient loads. They say the problem is working conditions that push people away.
Tips: Listen for what this group says the problem is, and what they say it is not.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A lack of loyalty among workers who choose to leave.: This group says the problem is not a lack of loyalty. They reject this explanation directly.
- Public money spent training workers who later leave.: Public money spent on training is the point made by the group that sees a serious threat.
- A global job market in which moving abroad is normal.: Movement in a global workforce is the middle-ground experts' point. It is not this group's view.
Correct Answer: Unconvinced by it, since it misses the real point.
Why this is correct: The speaker says blaming healthcare workers misses the point. The speaker clearly does not accept this kind of blame.
Tips: Listen for how sure the speaker sounds when talking about blame.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Sympathetic to it, since some workers do lack loyalty.: The speaker never says workers lack loyalty. The report presents loyalty as the wrong explanation.
- Undecided about it, since both sides have valid points.: The speaker does say both sides have valid points. But on blaming workers, the speaker is clear that it misses the point.
- Alarmed by it, since emergency rooms are short of staff.: Feeling alarmed belongs to the group that sees a serious threat. The speaker does not react to blame with alarm.
Correct Answer: About 60 nurses.
Why this is correct: The 2023 report found that nearly 15% of newly licensed nurses considered working abroad. 15% of 400 is 60.
Tips: Note the exact figure in the report, then apply it to the new group.
Why the other options are wrong:
- About 340 nurses.: 340 is the other 85% of the group. These are the nurses who did not consider leaving.
- About 80 nurses.: 80 would be 20% of 400. The report said nearly 15%, not 20%.
- About 320 nurses.: 320 would be 80% of 400. That is far above the reported figure of nearly 15%.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation