- You will hear a report once. It is about 3 minutes long.
- Then 6 questions will appear.
- Choose the best way to answer each question from the drop-down menu.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: medical deliveries and deliveries serving other emergencies.
Why this is correct: The speaker proposes starting with medical and emergency uses. Remote communities appear in the example, not as the proposed second category.
Tips: Read each choice carefully, then compare it with what you hear.
Why the other options are wrong:
- medical deliveries and deliveries serving remote communities.: Remote communities describe the medical trial's destination. The proposed initial categories are medical and emergency uses.
- commercial deliveries and deliveries serving remote communities.: Commercial delivery is the industry's wider goal. Remote communities belong to the medical example, rather than the proposed initial categories.
- commercial deliveries and deliveries serving other emergencies.: Emergency uses fit the proposal. The other initial category is medical delivery, rather than commercial delivery generally.
Correct Answer: Widespread delivery operates over neighbourhoods, with possible disruption to sleep and outdoor conversation.
Why this is correct: Park models widespread delivery over neighbourhoods and possible disruption from added noise. Convenience-driven demand and lost emissions savings belong to another study.
Tips: Use the passage to identify the complete claim and its context.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Convenience drives extra deliveries, with possible losses of the emissions savings from each trip.: This is the Conference Board’s demand-and-emissions relationship. Park models widespread deployment and its possible noise effects.
- Widespread delivery operates over neighbourhoods, with possible losses of the emissions savings from each trip.: The widespread-deployment scenario matches Park. Lost per-trip savings belong to the separate convenience-driven demand forecast.
- Convenience drives extra deliveries, with possible disruption to sleep and outdoor conversation.: The disruption outcome matches Park. Convenience generating extra orders is the other study’s explanatory condition, rather than Park’s modelled deployment scenario.
Correct Answer: The earlier objection questions whether safeguards fit the surveillance; the later objection questions whether safeguards can be enforced.
Why this is correct: The earlier concern is legislation’s fit to drone surveillance. Critics later challenge whether the proposed camera restrictions can be enforced.
Tips: Use the passage to identify the complete claim and its context.
Why the other options are wrong:
- The earlier objection questions whether safeguards can be enforced; the later objection raises the same practical concern.: Practical enforcement is the later criticism. The earlier objection concerns legislation not designed for this surveillance.
- The earlier objection questions whether safeguards can be enforced; the later objection questions whether safeguards fit the surveillance.: This reverses the two objections. Legal suitability comes first, followed by practical enforcement of the camera recommendation.
- The earlier objection questions whether safeguards fit the surveillance; the later objection raises the same suitability concern.: Legal suitability is the earlier concern. The later objection instead challenges practical enforcement of the camera recommendation.
Correct Answer: put the first service below capacity and the second below capacity.
Why this is correct: The lower rate gives 2,500 deliveries, below 2,600. The upper rate gives 2,700, below 2,800. Both services stay below capacity.
Tips: Identify the relevant source figures before applying the hypothetical conditions.
Why the other options are wrong:
- put the first service above capacity and the second below capacity.: This uses 35% for the first service instead of 25%. Its correct total is 2,500, below capacity.
- put the first service below capacity and the second above capacity.: This uses the unrelated 80% emissions figure for the second service. Its delivery-demand rate is 35%, leaving it below capacity.
- put the first service above capacity and the second above capacity.: This combines the upper-rate substitution for the first service with the emissions-percentage substitution for the second.
Correct Answer: reluctance to engage with concerns raised by other groups.
Why this is correct: The transition describes reluctance to address the concerns. This is an assessment of engagement, rather than uncertainty, divided evaluation or confidence.
Tips: Use the passage to identify the complete claim and its context.
Why the other options are wrong:
- uncertainty about how serious those concerns would prove in practice.: The noise discussion expresses conditional uncertainty about impacts. The transition instead describes reluctance to address concerns.
- ambivalence about those concerns when weighed against the technology’s acknowledged benefits.: The narrator later weighs valuable applications against unresolved concerns. That ambivalence is not the response described at the transition.
- confidence that those concerns would not prevent further advances in the technology.: The narrator expects progress regardless of regulation. This changes that condition to community concerns and assigns the confidence to the transition.
Correct Answer: Rules under development addressed flying beyond visual range; an issued paper addressed camera use.
Why this is correct: The opening describes rules under development for flights beyond visual range. The later issued guidance paper recommends restrictions on camera use.
Tips: Use the passage to identify the complete claim and its context.
Why the other options are wrong:
- An issued paper addressed flying beyond visual range; rules under development addressed camera use.: This assigns the paper to flight range and developing rules to cameras. Both actual status-and-purpose pairings are reversed.
- Rules under development addressed camera use; an issued paper addressed flying beyond visual range.: The developing rules concern flight range, while the issued paper concerns cameras. This preserves the status order but reverses the purposes.
- An issued paper addressed camera use; rules under development addressed flying beyond visual range.: Both status-and-purpose pairings match, but their order is reversed. The developing flight-range rules appear first.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation