Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
CELPIP Practice Listening: Listening for Viewpoints ID: #61972 Medium Writer Payments for a Library Programme
Instructions ›
  • You will hear a report once. It is about 3 minutes long.
  • Then 6 questions will appear.
  • Choose the best way to answer each question from the drop-down menu.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.

Correct Answer: Tiered fees, with a published fee sheet and a protected access budget.

Why this is correct: The speaker favours the tiered approach, but only with a published fee sheet. The speaker also wants a protected accessibility budget.

Tips: Listen for the conditions the speaker attaches to the plan, and keep both in mind.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • Tiered fees, with a published fee sheet and pay linked to ticket sales.: The fee sheet is right. But the speaker says pay must never depend on ticket sales.
  • Tiered fees, with a separate deal for each writer and a protected access budget.: The access budget is right. But the speaker wants a published fee sheet, not a separate deal for each writer.
  • Tiered fees, with a separate deal for each writer and pay linked to ticket sales.: Both conditions are wrong. The speaker wants a published fee sheet, and pay must never depend on ticket sales.

Correct Answer: could not then be used for books or longer opening hours.

Why this is correct: These organisers say every dollar spent on fees is unavailable for books or longer opening hours.

Tips: Several groups talk about money here. Keep each point with the group that makes it.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • could not then be used for accessible rooms or captioning.: Accessible rooms and captioning come from library staff. They say the budget must cover these as well as speakers.
  • could not then be used for promotion or event publicity.: Promotion is on the library staff's list. Publicity is what organisers say the library gives writers, not a cost.
  • could not then be used for travel or workshop materials.: Travel money and workshop materials belong to the tiered model and the visiting instructor. The organisers do not mention them.

Correct Answer: To show that equal session fees can miss real differences in work.

Why this is correct: The comparison comes right after the flat fee's weakness. A short reading takes one evening, but a three-hour class can take most of a day.

Tips: When the speaker compares two people, ask which argument the comparison supports.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • To show that categories can start arguments over what a workshop is.: Arguments about categories are the critics' worry about the tiered model. The poet and instructor show a weakness of the flat fee.
  • To show that exposure may bring several book sales, or none at all.: Uncertain book sales are the problem with exposure as payment. That point comes before the flat fee is discussed.
  • To show that the budget must also cover rooms and promotion.: Rooms and promotion are the library staff's budget warning. They have nothing to do with the poet and instructor.

Correct Answer: Firmly against it, and mindful of what the library can afford.

Why this is correct: The speaker wants to replace vague promises of exposure with clear terms. But the speaker also says the library should not promise fees it cannot sustain.

Tips: Separate what supporters say about this model from what the speaker says about it.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • Open to it, and mindful of what the library can afford.: The speaker is not open to paying in exposure. The goal is to replace vague promises of exposure with clear terms.
  • Firmly against it, and unconcerned about what the library can afford.: The speaker does care about cost. The library should not promise fees it can sustain only by cutting access.
  • Open to it, and unconcerned about what the library can afford.: Both parts are wrong. The speaker rejects exposure as pay and also cares about the library's budget.

Correct Answer: A fixed budget must also pay for accessible rooms, captions and promotion.

Why this is correct: Library staff warn that a fixed programme budget must cover accessible rooms, captioning and promotion, not only speakers.

Tips: Match each warning to the group that gives it.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • Fee categories could cause arguments over what counts as a workshop.: Arguments over categories are the critics' worry about the tiered model, not the staff's warning.
  • Staff could not easily explain a different fee for each format.: Easy explaining comes up as a reason some people like the flat fee. Staff do not warn that tiered fees are hard to explain.
  • Even a full room might not lead to any book sales for writers.: Uncertain book sales are the report's point about exposure as payment. Staff talk about rooms, captions and promotion.

Correct Answer: $5,100.

Why this is correct: Sixteen sessions at $250 make $4,000. Six workshops add $900, and two travellers add $200, so the total is $5,100.

Tips: Write down each payment and who gets it. Then apply them to the new schedule.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • $4,900.: This leaves out the $100 travel payment for the two presenters.
  • $4,200.: This leaves out the extra $150 for each workshop leader, and it still adds travel.
  • $5,400.: This uses the report's eight workshops instead of the six in this case.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...