Read the following message.
Hi Leanne,
Thank you for sharing the comments from people who attended our first job-search workshop. I was pleased that they found the résumé examples useful, but several people said the evening felt more like a class than a conversation. That explains why few participants described their own experiences, even when we invited questions.
For next month, I suggest keeping the examples but changing how we use them. Instead of presenting all three at the front, we could put one on each table and ask small groups what they would improve. I can circulate to answer questions. You have a good way of drawing quieter people into a discussion, so perhaps you could open the evening and explain that there is no single perfect résumé.
I am not proposing that we remove the short section on online applications. Several attendees specifically asked for it. I only think we should move it until after the table discussion, when people will have examples in mind. We should also leave the last part of the evening flexible. If the groups are engaged, we can continue; if not, we can demonstrate the application form as planned.
Could you tell me whether this still meets the library's expectations? I want to respond to the feedback without making the session feel unplanned.
Best,
Colin
Using the drop-down menu (▾), choose the best option according to the information given in the message.
2.Colin wants to preserve
3.The strength Colin sees in Leanne is that
4.Colin sees flexibility at the end as
5.Throughout the message, Colin is trying to balance
6.Toward the first workshop, Colin feels
Here is a response to the message. Complete the response by filling in the blanks. Select the best choice for each blank from the drop-down menu (▾).
Your suggested format 7. The library wants practical help, but it also wants residents to learn from one another. Starting with tables should 8. I agree that the online section should 9., since people asked for it.
I can introduce the evening and reassure everyone that 10. Keeping the ending flexible seems sensible rather than careless because 11. I will send the revised outline to the librarian.
Leanne
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: explain why he wants a different format
Why this is correct: Colin writes to explain why he wants a different format. The first workshop felt like a class, so few people shared their experiences. The rest of his message sets out a new, more conversational plan.
Passage Reference: few participants described their own experiences
Tips: Find the problem the attendees reported. Then ask what the rest of Colin's message does about it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- argue that the workshop should be cancelled: He proposes a revised next session.
- criticize Leanne’s way of leading: He praises Leanne’s ability to include quiet people.
- show that the résumé examples were inaccurate: Attendees found the examples useful.
Correct Answer: the useful content requested by attendees
Passage Reference: I am not proposing that we remove the short section on online applications.
Why this is correct: He changes the sequence and format while retaining valued material.
Tips: Look for what changes and what stays.
Why the other options are wrong:
- the rule that only one résumé is acceptable: He wants Leanne to say there is no single perfect version.
- a fixed ending regardless of participation: He clearly proposes flexibility.
- the lecture style used in the first session: He wants more table discussion.
Correct Answer: she can help hesitant participants join in
Passage Reference: You have a good way of drawing quieter people into a discussion
Why this is correct: Her strength directly addresses the limited participation.
Tips: Match the person’s strength with the problem it is meant to solve.
Why the other options are wrong:
- she can decide whether to remove the online section: Colin wants to keep that requested section. Leanne's special strength is about participation.
- she can demonstrate every résumé at the front: Colin wants the examples placed on tables rather than presented together at the front.
- she can explain the library's goals before discussion: Colin asks Leanne about the library's expectations later, but he chooses her opening role because she draws quiet people into discussion.
Correct Answer: a planned response to how the groups react
Passage Reference: If the groups are engaged, we can continue; if not, we can demonstrate the application form as planned.
Why this is correct: He defines two purposeful responses rather than leaving the ending random.
Tips: A conditional plan can still be carefully organized.
Why the other options are wrong:
- proof that the workshop needs no outline: He asks whether the revised plan meets expectations.
- a requirement imposed by attendees: Attendees asked for online content, not a flexible schedule.
- a way to avoid online applications completely: The demonstration remains one possible ending.
Correct Answer: responsiveness with a sense of preparation
Passage Reference: I want to respond to the feedback without making the session feel unplanned.
Why this is correct: Every change Colin suggests answers the feedback. His final sentence names the two goals behind the whole message: responding to people and keeping the session well planned.
Tips: Find the sentence where Colin names two aims he holds at the same time. Both halves must match the option.
Why the other options are wrong:
- participant choice with fewer practical examples: He keeps all three useful examples, so practical content is not reduced.
- library approval with a fixed ending: He seeks library approval, but proposes two possible endings based on participation.
- more discussion with an unchanged lecture order: Colin wants more discussion and also changes the order by moving online applications later.
Correct Answer: encouraged by part of it but willing to revise it
Passage Reference: I was pleased that they found the résumé examples useful, but several people said the evening felt more like a class than a conversation.
Why this is correct: He values what worked and acts on the criticism.
Tips: Use both sides of the contrast introduced by but.
Why the other options are wrong:
- ashamed of the entire event: He expresses pleasure about the examples.
- uncertain whether participants wanted practical help: Their requests and praise show they did.
- satisfied and opposed to any change: Most of the email proposes changes.
Correct Answer: fits what the library is trying to achieve
Passage Reference: The library wants practical help, but it also wants residents to learn from one another.
Why this is correct: Leanne confirms that conversation and practical help both match the library’s aims.
Tips: Use Leanne’s next sentence to understand her judgment.
Why the other options are wrong:
- ignores the comments completely: The new format responds directly to them.
- turns the event into an unplanned meeting: It has a clear sequence and backup ending.
- removes the practical focus: Résumé examples and online applications remain.
Correct Answer: make it easier for quieter people to contribute
Passage Reference: few participants described their own experiences
Why this is correct: Small groups respond to the earlier participation problem.
Tips: Connect the new format with the weakness identified earlier.
Why the other options are wrong:
- prevent Colin from answering questions: He will circulate to answer them.
- ensure every group reaches the same answer: The introduction says there is no single perfect résumé.
- return the workshop to a lecture: Table work is meant to create conversation.
Correct Answer: remain in the session but follow the discussion
Passage Reference: I only think we should move it until after the table discussion
Why this is correct: Colin changes its position, not its inclusion.
Tips: Watch for move versus remove.
Why the other options are wrong:
- be removed despite the requests: He clearly says he does not want to remove it.
- replace all three résumé examples: The examples stay on the tables.
- open the evening before the table work: He places it after discussion.
Correct Answer: different approaches can still be effective
Passage Reference: there is no single perfect résumé
Why this is correct: Leanne will express the same idea in positive terms.
Tips: Paraphrase the meaning rather than copying the original wording.
Why the other options are wrong:
- the online form is no longer relevant: The online section is retained.
- participants should avoid sharing experiences: The revision encourages sharing.
- Colin has selected the only correct résumé: The source rejects one perfect version.
Correct Answer: you have prepared useful choices for either response
Passage Reference: If the groups are engaged, we can continue; if not, we can demonstrate the application form as planned.
Why this is correct: The two prepared paths make flexibility deliberate.
Tips: A backup plan is evidence of preparation.
Why the other options are wrong:
- the participants will certainly keep talking: The plan allows for the opposite.
- I can cancel the workshop without notice: Cancellation is not one of the choices.
- the librarian has refused to approve a schedule: No refusal has occurred.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation