Read the following message.
Hi Priya,
Daniel mentioned that you have stopped inviting me to the Sunday dinners because you thought my recent refusals meant I wanted some distance. I am sorry I gave that impression. I miss seeing you. What has been difficult is not the company but the kind of evening I imagined I had to be ready for.
Since returning to work, I spend the week moving between conversations and decisions. By Sunday, a crowded table and a late night can feel like one more occasion where I need to stay lively. Your dinners have always been generous and welcoming. That is partly why I felt I should arrive cheerful and remain until everyone left, even though you never actually asked that of me.
I now realize that saying only “not this week” hid the real problem and left you to invent an explanation. I should have said that I would enjoy a shorter visit or a quiet walk. I was also embarrassed to suggest changing an event that everyone else seemed to enjoy.
Please keep holding the dinners exactly as you like. I am not asking you to redesign them around me. I only hope we can stop treating a full evening as the only way to spend time together. I could come for tea before the other guests arrive, or we could meet on another day. If I sometimes decline the dinner, it is a limit on my energy, not a measure of how much I value our friendship.
Take care,
Mei
Using the drop-down menu (▾), choose the best option according to the information given in the message.
2.The dinners felt demanding to Mei since
3.Mei mentions that the dinners are generous and welcoming
4.Looking back on her brief refusals, Mei realizes
5.The change Mei actually wants is
6.The tone of Mei's message is best described as
Here is a response to the message. Complete the response by filling in the blanks. Select the best choice for each blank from the drop-down menu (▾).
I am glad you explained. I mistook your brief refusals for 7., when they were really about the energy a long social evening requires. I also understand why my dinners may have felt demanding even though 8.
You do not need to protect the existing dinner by 9. Tea beforehand sounds like a good way to see each other without 10. Most of all, I will remember that declining one kind of invitation 11.
Priya
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: Priya took low energy as less interest in friendship
Why this is correct: Mei writes because Priya read her refusals as a wish for distance. Her whole message separates her limited energy from her feelings about Priya.
Passage Reference: If I sometimes decline the dinner, it is a limit on my energy, not a measure of how much I value our friendship.
Tips: To find why someone is writing, put the opening problem next to the final contrast.
Why the other options are wrong:
- Daniel said Mei disliked the food being served: Food is never given as a reason for declining.
- Mei thought Priya had moved dinners to another day: Priya stopped inviting her because of the refusals.
- Priya believed Mei wanted more guests at dinner: Crowds are part of what tires Mei. She did not ask for more guests.
Correct Answer: she believed a good guest must stay cheerful and late
Passage Reference: I felt I should arrive cheerful and remain until everyone left, even though you never actually asked that of me.
Why this is correct: Mei placed those expectations on herself after an already demanding week.
Tips: Distinguish what Priya requested from what Mei assumed was expected.
Why the other options are wrong:
- she assumed a quiet visit would be unwelcome: She was embarrassed to propose an alternative, but Priya had not rejected quiet visits.
- she thought an early exit would shorten every dinner: Mei feared suggesting a change, but she does not say one early departure would alter every dinner.
- she thought naming tiredness would sound critical: The pressure she describes came from her own belief that she must stay lively and late.
Correct Answer: to show her difficulty is not criticism of Priya
Passage Reference: Your dinners have always been generous and welcoming.
Why this is correct: Mei appreciates the events while explaining that their length and energy demands do not suit her every week.
Tips: Ask why a writer would add praise at this point. Read the sentences just before and after it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- to suggest Priya invites people out of obligation: She describes genuine warmth, not duty.
- to explain why dinners should become more formal: She seeks shorter, quieter contact, not extra formality.
- to prove that Mei has attended every dinner: Her recent refusals show she has not.
Correct Answer: they hid useful context and invited a wrong conclusion
Passage Reference: saying only “not this week” hid the real problem and left you to invent an explanation.
Why this is correct: Her short answers were incomplete, so Priya filled the gap incorrectly.
Tips: Ask what information the short reply failed to carry.
Why the other options are wrong:
- they showed interest in shorter visits, not walks: Mei says she should have mentioned those alternatives because her refusals did not reveal them.
- they described her energy but offered no alternative: The brief refusals did not describe her energy at all.
- they protected dinners and explained the friendship: They did not explain Mei's feelings, so Priya inferred distance.
Correct Answer: more ways to see Priya besides the full dinner
Passage Reference: I only hope we can stop treating a full evening as the only way to spend time together.
Why this is correct: She wants flexible forms of contact while leaving Priya's dinners intact.
Tips: Separate changing the friendship's options from changing the event itself.
Why the other options are wrong:
- an end to the Sunday dinners for everyone: She tells Priya to keep holding them as she likes.
- a rule that all guests must leave early: Her energy limit belongs to her, not every guest.
- an invitation only when Daniel can attend: Daniel is not part of her suggested alternatives.
Correct Answer: honest about limits and careful not to blame Priya
Passage Reference: I am not asking you to redesign them around me.
Why this is correct: The tone of Mei's message is honest and careful. She explains her own limits openly, and she takes the blame for her short refusals instead of blaming Priya.
Tips: Tone comes from how the writer speaks about herself and about the reader. Notice who Mei says caused the problem.
Why the other options are wrong:
- certain Priya alone caused the misunderstanding: Mei admits that her own short refusals hid the reason.
- angry that Priya enjoys large gatherings: Mei praises the dinners and asks Priya to continue them.
- unconcerned about the lost invitations: She writes because she misses Priya.
Correct Answer: a wish to spend less time with me
Passage Reference: you thought my recent refusals meant I wanted some distance
Why this is correct: Priya had treated declined dinners as evidence that Mei wanted less contact.
Tips: Identify the conclusion Priya drew, not the real cause.
Why the other options are wrong:
- discomfort with the food I served: Mei never criticizes the food.
- a request to invite Daniel instead: Daniel only communicated the misunderstanding.
- a change in your work schedule: Work drains Mei's energy, but the mistaken conclusion concerned the friendship.
Correct Answer: I never required you to stay until the end
Passage Reference: even though you never actually asked that of me.
Why this is correct: Priya understands that Mei's sense of duty came from an assumption, not an explicit demand from Priya.
Tips: Remember that Priya is speaking now. Find where Mei explains why the evenings felt hard, and read the whole sentence.
Why the other options are wrong:
- I asked you to entertain every guest: Priya made no such request.
- Daniel planned the evening for you: No planning role is given to Daniel.
- everyone left before I arrived: Mei imagined staying until everyone else left.
Correct Answer: hiding what would make a visit easier
Passage Reference: I should have said that I would enjoy a shorter visit or a quiet walk.
Why this is correct: Priya says Mei can share workable alternatives without threatening the existing dinner.
Tips: Silence did not actually protect the friendship.
Why the other options are wrong:
- attending every gathering when exhausted: That would ignore Mei's stated energy limit.
- asking you to cancel the dinners: Mei clearly wants them to continue.
- pretending that I dislike quiet walks: A quiet walk is one of her preferences.
Correct Answer: the pressure you linked to a full evening
Passage Reference: a crowded table and a late night can feel like one more occasion where I need to stay lively.
Why this is correct: Tea creates contact without the performance and duration Mei found tiring.
Tips: Carry the specific burden from Mei's explanation into Priya's alternative.
Why the other options are wrong:
- showing that our friendship matters: Meeting for tea would express that value.
- my continuing to host other guests: Mei wants the dinners to continue, so this is not something tea must prevent.
- having any conversation after work: Mei proposes tea and a walk, so conversation itself is welcome.
Correct Answer: does not mean rejecting the friendship
Passage Reference: it is a limit on my energy, not a measure of how much I value our friendship.
Why this is correct: Priya now separates one unsuitable format from Mei's overall wish for contact.
Tips: Do not turn a boundary about one activity into a conclusion about the whole relationship.
Why the other options are wrong:
- means the dinner itself should end: Mei encourages Priya to keep hosting it.
- requires a detailed excuse every time: The email asks for understanding, not a reporting rule.
- shows that all social contact is unwanted: Mei offers tea, walks, and another day.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation