Read the following article from a website.
Halifax council is considering limits on the loudest cargo work at the port between eleven at night and six in the morning. Residents of the new apartment towers beside the old piers have filed more than nine hundred noise complaints since January, most about cranes stacking containers and rail cars banging together. The port employs about four hundred people on its night shifts. The port says night work keeps goods moving, and council will hold a public hearing next month.
Kerensa Rizzo, a public-health researcher, says the evidence on lost sleep is strong. “Children who live within a few blocks of the piers score lower on attention tests, and their families visit clinics for sleep problems far more often,” she said. “A night of broken sleep follows a child into the classroom the next day. Teachers see it before parents do.” Rizzo wants noise limits set pier by pier, with exceptions only for fresh food that cannot wait until morning.
Bartosz Rakowski, who manages a container terminal, says tides and train schedules leave little room to move work into daylight. “Ships arrive when the tide lets them, not when it suits a bylaw. We cannot ask the ocean to wait,” Rakowski said. “If we stop unloading at night, containers pile up on the dock and stores wait days for their stock.” He says the terminal is willing to buy quieter electric cranes and rubber pads for the rail yard.
Hanneke Quist, a provincial trade analyst, says the city needs numbers before rules. “Nobody has measured what a night limit would cost the region in lost shipments,” she said. “Study that first, and allow exceptions for harvest season and winter storms. Rules written in a hurry are hard to undo,” Quist said. Yaroslav Rudnicki, who speaks for a residents’ group near the piers, says trust is the real problem. “The port measures its own noise and reports its own delays,” he said. “Let an independent auditor check both, and publish the results every month,” Rudnicki said.
Using the drop-down menu (▾), choose the best option according to the information given on the website.
According to Kerensa Rizzo, children near the piers 2..
Paragraph three mainly gives 3..
Yaroslav Rudnicki’s concerns would likely be supported by 4..
This article shows that 5..
The following is a comment by a visitor to the website page. Complete the comment by choosing the best option to fill in each blank.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: a proposal to limit port noise at night
Why this is correct: Council is considering limits on the loudest cargo work at the port at night. All four speakers respond to that idea.
Passage Reference: Halifax council is considering limits on the loudest cargo work at the port
Tips: An option can use the right place and still describe the wrong event. Ask what decision the people quoted are arguing for or against.
Why the other options are wrong:
- a plan to build towers beside the piers: The towers are already built. Their residents are the ones complaining.
- a strike by workers at the container terminal: No strike is mentioned in the article.
- a study of grocery prices in the region: Stores waiting for stock is only part of Rakowski’s warning. Nobody studies prices.
Correct Answer: find it hard to focus in class
Passage Reference: Children who live within a few blocks of the piers score lower on attention tests ... A night of broken sleep follows a child into the classroom the next day.
Why this is correct: Rizzo says children near the piers score lower on attention tests. A night of broken sleep follows a child into the classroom.
Tips: Check each option against Rizzo’s quoted sentences only. Remove any that she never says or that her words contradict.
Why the other options are wrong:
- sleep well once windows are closed: Rizzo never mentions windows. She says their sleep is broken.
- are often sick from diesel fumes: Fumes are never mentioned. Rizzo talks about noise and lost sleep.
- hardly notice the noise at night: Rizzo says the opposite: the noise breaks their sleep.
Correct Answer: a manager’s case for unloading after dark
Passage Reference: tides and train schedules leave little room to move work into daylight ... We cannot ask the ocean to wait
Why this is correct: In paragraph three, Rakowski says tides and train schedules leave little room to move work into daylight.
Tips: Read “Paragraph three” and name, in plain words, what it is there for. Then test each choice against those lines alone.
Why the other options are wrong:
- a researcher’s evidence about children’s sleep: Rizzo gives this evidence in paragraph two.
- an analyst’s call to study costs first: Quist asks for a study in paragraph four.
- plans for building more apartment towers nearby: The towers already stand beside the piers. No paragraph describes plans for them.
Correct Answer: a finding that the port’s own noise reports were wrong
Passage Reference: The port measures its own noise and reports its own delays ... Let an independent auditor check both
Why this is correct: Rudnicki says the port measures its own noise and reports its own delays. A finding that those reports were wrong would back him up.
Tips: Think of each option as a new piece of evidence. Would it make Rudnicki’s point stronger, or would it suit someone else?
Why the other options are wrong:
- a study of tide times at the Halifax piers: Tides support Rakowski’s case for night work.
- records of lost shipments during storms: Lost shipments fit Quist’s call to count the costs first.
- test scores of children living near the port: Test scores support Rizzo’s evidence on lost sleep.
Correct Answer: there is little agreement on what to do first
Passage Reference: Rizzo wants noise limits set pier by pier ... the terminal is willing to buy quieter electric cranes ... says the city needs numbers before rules ... Let an independent auditor check both
Why this is correct: Rizzo wants limits pier by pier, and Rakowski offers quieter equipment. Quist wants a study first, and Rudnicki wants an outside auditor.
Tips: Read what Rizzo, Rakowski, Quist and Rudnicki each say. Pick the option the whole article backs up, and drop one that only a single speaker claims.
Why the other options are wrong:
- the port has agreed to new quiet hours: Rakowski says the port cannot stop unloading at night. Nothing has been agreed.
- children’s sleep matters more than shipping: This is close to Rizzo’s own view. The article does not take her side.
- the noise complaints have mostly stopped: Residents have filed a great many complaints since January.
Correct Answer: more than nine hundred
Passage Reference: Residents of the new apartment towers beside the old piers have filed more than nine hundred noise complaints since January
Why this is correct: Residents have filed more than nine hundred noise complaints since January.
Tips: Find how many complaints the tower residents have made this year. Read the size of the number carefully.
Why the other options are wrong:
- nearly three hundred: Three hundred is not the number in the article.
- about ninety: Ninety is far too small. The residents filed many more complaints.
- two thousand: Two thousand is not in the article. The residents filed fewer complaints than that.
Correct Answer: fresh food
Passage Reference: Rizzo wants noise limits set pier by pier, with exceptions only for fresh food that cannot wait until morning.
Why this is correct: Rizzo wants exceptions only for fresh food that cannot wait until morning.
Tips: The researcher allows one kind of cargo to be unloaded at night. Find which kind and why.
Why the other options are wrong:
- medicine: Rizzo does not mention medicine.
- fuel: Fuel is not mentioned in the article.
- mail: Mail is not mentioned in the article.
Correct Answer: pads
Passage Reference: He says the terminal is willing to buy quieter electric cranes and rubber pads for the rail yard.
Why this is correct: Rakowski says the terminal is willing to buy quieter electric cranes and rubber pads for the rail yard.
Tips: The terminal manager makes an offer to cut noise. Find what he would add to the rail yard.
Why the other options are wrong:
- walls: Rakowski does not offer to build walls.
- fences: Fences are not mentioned in the article.
- wheels: Rakowski does not mention wheels.
Correct Answer: harvest season
Passage Reference: Study that first, and allow exceptions for harvest season and winter storms
Why this is correct: Quist wants exceptions for harvest season and winter storms.
Tips: The trade analyst names two times when night work may be needed. One is about weather, so find the other.
Why the other options are wrong:
- school holidays: Quist does not mention holidays.
- election time: Elections are not mentioned in the article.
- tourist season: Quist names a different busy time of year.
Correct Answer: eleven
Passage Reference: between eleven at night and six in the morning
Why this is correct: The limits would apply between eleven at night and six in the morning.
Tips: Find the hours council is thinking of protecting. The commenter needs the time when they begin.
Why the other options are wrong:
- nine: The limits start later than nine.
- ten: The limits start later than ten.
- midnight: The limits start one hour earlier than midnight.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation