Choose answers from the options and drag them.
Which opinion do the speakers give about each of the following aspects of The Emporium’s production of Romeo and Juliet?
Aspects of the production
the set - 1
the lighting - 2
the costume design - 3
the music - 4
the actors’ delivery - 5
Transcript:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Question Focus: Main opinion about the set design
Why this is correct: Both speakers clearly praise the set. One says it was visually really stunning, and the other agrees it was the most memorable thing about the production.
Passage Reference: What about the set, for example? I think it was visually really stunning. I'd say that was probably the most memorable thing about this production.
Tips: When both speakers use strong positive language, listen for words like most, really, or best.
Why the other options are wrong:
- They both thought this was original.: This is tempting because the set is praised, but the speaker also says they have seen similar ideas used in other productions. That is a partial truth trap.
- They were both disappointed by this.: This is the opposite of what you hear. The speakers are very positive, so this is an opposite meaning trap.
Key Vocabulary:
- stunning = very impressive
- memorable = easy to remember
Question Focus: Shared view about the lighting
Passage Reference: What about the lighting? Some of the scenes were so dimly lit, it was quite hard to see. I didn't dislike it. It helped to change the mood of the quieter scenes.
Why this is correct: Even though it was hard to see, they agree the lighting helped to change the mood. This shows they felt it created the right atmosphere.
Tips: If a negative comment is followed by a positive reason, the final opinion is usually the answer.
Why the other options are wrong:
- They were both disappointed by this.: The lighting is criticised at first, but then accepted as effective. Choosing disappointment is a sequence trap.
- They disagree about how this could be improved.: They do not talk about improvements, only the effect, so this is a context shift trap.
Key Vocabulary:
- dimly lit = not bright
- mood = atmosphere
Question Focus: Expectation versus reality of costumes
Passage Reference: What did you think of the costumes? I was a bit surprised by the contemporary dress, I must say. Yeah, I think it worked well, but I'd assumed it would be more conventional.
Why this is correct: Both speakers say they thought the costumes would be more traditional. Words like surprised and assumed show their expectations.
Tips: Listen for words about expectations like expected, assumed, or surprised.
Why the other options are wrong:
- They agree this was a major strength.: They say it worked well, but the main point is surprise, not strength. This is an example-as-main-idea trap.
- They both thought this was original.: Originality is not mentioned. This is a paraphrase trap.
Key Vocabulary:
- contemporary = modern
- conventional = traditional
Question Focus: Opinion about the use of music
Passage Reference: I liked the music at the beginning, and I thought the musicians were brilliant, but I thought they were wasted because the music didn't have much impact in Acts 2 and 3. Yes, that was a shame.
Why this is correct: Although the music and musicians were good, both speakers agree it was wasted and had little impact later. This shows clear disappointment.
Tips: Overall opinion matters more than one positive detail at the start.
Why the other options are wrong:
- They agree this was a major strength.: Only the beginning is praised, not the overall use. This is a partial truth trap.
- They disagree about why this was an issue.: They both agree on the problem, so disagreement is incorrect. This is a wrong focus trap.
Key Vocabulary:
- wasted = not used well
- impact = strong effect
Question Focus: Reason for problems with acting delivery
Passage Reference: One problem with this production was that the actors didn't deliver the lines that well. They were speaking too fast. It was a problem, I agree. But I thought it was because they weren't speaking loudly enough, especially at key points in the play.
Why this is correct: Both agree there is a problem, but one blames speed while the other blames volume. This shows disagreement about why it was an issue.
Tips: When speakers give different reasons, listen for contrast words like but.
Why the other options are wrong:
- They disagree about how this could be improved.: They talk about causes, not solutions. This is a paraphrase trap.
- They were both disappointed by this.: Disappointment is implied, but the key point is disagreement. This is a focus trap.
Key Vocabulary:
- delivery = way of speaking
- key points = important moments
General Tips:
- Questions follow the order of the recording, so use the previous answer to predict what comes next.
- Focus on the MAIN opinion, not the first comment you hear.
- Listen carefully for agreement or disagreement between speakers.
- Be careful of partial praise followed by criticism.
- Read all options first and listen for how opinions are explained, not just single words.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation