Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
IELTS Practice Listening: Match Headings ID: #57422 Medium The Emporium
Instructions ›

Choose answers from the options and drag them.

Which opinion do the speakers give about each of the following aspects of The Emporium’s production of Romeo and Juliet?

Aspects of the production

the set -  1

the lighting -  2

the costume design -  3

the music -  4

the actors’ delivery -  5


You will hear a conversation between two people discussing a production of Shakespeare's play, Romeo and Juliet, at the Emporium Theatre. Now listen carefully and answer the questions. So what about the Emporium Theatre's production of the play? I thought some things worked really well, but there were some problems too. Yeah. What about the set, for example? I think it was visually really stunning. I'd say that was probably the most memorable thing about this production. You're right. The set design was really amazing. But actually, I have seen similar ideas used in other productions. What about the lighting? Some of the scenes were so dimly lit, it was quite hard to see. I didn't dislike it. It helped to change the mood of the quieter scenes. That's a good point. What did you think of the costumes? I was a bit surprised by the contemporary dress, I must say. Yeah, I think it worked well, but I'd assumed it would be more conventional. Me too. I liked the music at the beginning, and I thought the musicians were brilliant, but I thought they were wasted because the music didn't have much impact in Acts 2 and 3. Yes, that was a shame. One problem with this production was that the actors didn't deliver the lines that well. They were speaking too fast. It was a problem, I agree. But I thought it was because they weren't speaking loudly enough, especially at key points in the play. I actually didn't have a problem with that. It's been an interesting experience watching different versions of Romeo and Juliet, hasn't it? Definitely. It's made me realise how relevant the play still is. Right. I mean, a lot's changed since Shakespeare's time, but in many ways, nothing's changed. There are always disagreements and tension between teenagers and their parents. Yes, that's something all young people can relate to, more than the violence and the extreme emotions in the play. How did you find watching it in translation? Really interesting. I expected to find it more challenging, but I could follow the story pretty well. I stopped worrying about not being able to understand all the words and focused on the actors' expressions. The ending was pretty powerful. Yes, that somehow intensified the emotion for me. Did you know Shakespeare's been translated into more languages than any other writer? What's the reason for his international appeal, do you think? I was reading that it's because his plays are about basic themes that people everywhere are familiar with. Yeah, and they can also be understood on different levels. The characters have such depth. Right, which allows directors to experiment and find new angles. That's really important because...
5 gaps
Options
They both expected this to be more traditional.
They both thought this was original.
They agree this created the right atmosphere.
They agree this was a major strength.
They were both disappointed by this.
They disagree about why this was an issue.
They disagree about how this could be improved.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.

Question Focus: Main opinion about the set design

Why this is correct: Both speakers clearly praise the set. One says it was visually really stunning, and the other agrees it was the most memorable thing about the production.

Passage Reference: What about the set, for example? I think it was visually really stunning. I'd say that was probably the most memorable thing about this production.

Tips: When both speakers use strong positive language, listen for words like most, really, or best.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • They both thought this was original.: This is tempting because the set is praised, but the speaker also says they have seen similar ideas used in other productions. That is a partial truth trap.
  • They were both disappointed by this.: This is the opposite of what you hear. The speakers are very positive, so this is an opposite meaning trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • stunning = very impressive
  • memorable = easy to remember

Question Focus: Shared view about the lighting

Passage Reference: What about the lighting? Some of the scenes were so dimly lit, it was quite hard to see. I didn't dislike it. It helped to change the mood of the quieter scenes.

Why this is correct: Even though it was hard to see, they agree the lighting helped to change the mood. This shows they felt it created the right atmosphere.

Tips: If a negative comment is followed by a positive reason, the final opinion is usually the answer.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • They were both disappointed by this.: The lighting is criticised at first, but then accepted as effective. Choosing disappointment is a sequence trap.
  • They disagree about how this could be improved.: They do not talk about improvements, only the effect, so this is a context shift trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • dimly lit = not bright
  • mood = atmosphere

Question Focus: Expectation versus reality of costumes

Passage Reference: What did you think of the costumes? I was a bit surprised by the contemporary dress, I must say. Yeah, I think it worked well, but I'd assumed it would be more conventional.

Why this is correct: Both speakers say they thought the costumes would be more traditional. Words like surprised and assumed show their expectations.

Tips: Listen for words about expectations like expected, assumed, or surprised.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • They agree this was a major strength.: They say it worked well, but the main point is surprise, not strength. This is an example-as-main-idea trap.
  • They both thought this was original.: Originality is not mentioned. This is a paraphrase trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • contemporary = modern
  • conventional = traditional

Question Focus: Opinion about the use of music

Passage Reference: I liked the music at the beginning, and I thought the musicians were brilliant, but I thought they were wasted because the music didn't have much impact in Acts 2 and 3. Yes, that was a shame.

Why this is correct: Although the music and musicians were good, both speakers agree it was wasted and had little impact later. This shows clear disappointment.

Tips: Overall opinion matters more than one positive detail at the start.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • They agree this was a major strength.: Only the beginning is praised, not the overall use. This is a partial truth trap.
  • They disagree about why this was an issue.: They both agree on the problem, so disagreement is incorrect. This is a wrong focus trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • wasted = not used well
  • impact = strong effect

Question Focus: Reason for problems with acting delivery

Passage Reference: One problem with this production was that the actors didn't deliver the lines that well. They were speaking too fast. It was a problem, I agree. But I thought it was because they weren't speaking loudly enough, especially at key points in the play.

Why this is correct: Both agree there is a problem, but one blames speed while the other blames volume. This shows disagreement about why it was an issue.

Tips: When speakers give different reasons, listen for contrast words like but.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • They disagree about how this could be improved.: They talk about causes, not solutions. This is a paraphrase trap.
  • They were both disappointed by this.: Disappointment is implied, but the key point is disagreement. This is a focus trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • delivery = way of speaking
  • key points = important moments

General Tips:

  • Questions follow the order of the recording, so use the previous answer to predict what comes next.
  • Focus on the MAIN opinion, not the first comment you hear.
  • Listen carefully for agreement or disagreement between speakers.
  • Be careful of partial praise followed by criticism.
  • Read all options first and listen for how opinions are explained, not just single words.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...