Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
IELTS Practice Listening: Match Headings ID: #57438 Medium Edible patches
Instructions ›

What advantage do the speakers identify for each of the following projects?

Choose FIVE answers from the options and drag them.

Projects

edible patch -  1

ripeness sensor -  2

waste tracking technology -  3

smartphone application -  4

food waste composting -  5


You will hear a discussion between two people about research projects and technologies aimed at reducing food waste. Now listen carefully and answer the questions. Okay, shall we now have a look at the projects that different researchers and organizations are working on? For me, the project I really liked was the one at Tufts University. You know, where they've invented tiny edible patches to stick on fresh foods that show you what level of bacteria is present, and so whether you can still eat it. It's a great idea, as it tells you if you need to hurry up and eat the food before it goes off. The other good thing about the patches is that apparently they'll be cheap to manufacture. Good. Then the other thing I thought was great was the Massachusetts Institute of Technology project. I hadn't seen that. Well, they've developed these sensors that can detect tiny amounts of ethylene. Ethylene is the natural plant hormone in fruit that makes them turn ripe, apparently. The researchers think that they can attach the sensors to cardboard boxes. And then supermarkets can scan the sensors with a portable device to see how ripe the fruit inside is. That's got to be a quicker way to check for ripeness than taking each box off the shelf and opening it. Definitely. And I thought that LeanPath was worth mentioning too. Their waste tracking technology means that caterers can see how much food is being wasted and why. That'll increase profits for them eventually. Yes. And did you read about 0%? They've produced this smartphone application that allows restaurants to send donation alerts to food charities. The charities can then pick up the unwanted food and distribute it to people in need. In the long run, that'll definitely benefit poorer families in the neighborhood. No kid should go to school hungry. I agree. And I read that quite a few local governments in the USA are thinking about introducing compulsory composting in their states, so you can't put any food waste into your rubbish bins, just the compost bin. Well, I guess that means a bit more work for people. I mean, they have to separate the organic and inorganic waste themselves before they take it out to the compost bin. And you know how lazy some people are. But I guess if we all start composting, we'd be doing something positive about the problem of food waste ourselves, rather than relying on the government to sort it out. Having said that, not everyone has a garden.
5 gaps
Options
It should save time.
It will create new jobs.
It will benefit local communities.
It will make money.
It will encourage personal responsibility.
It will be easy to advertise.
It will involve very little cost.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.

Question Focus: Advantage of the edible patch project

Why this is correct: The speaker clearly says the patches will be cheap to manufacture. That directly matches the idea of very little cost, which is the main advantage mentioned.

Passage Reference: The other good thing about the patches is that apparently they'll be cheap to manufacture. Good.

Tips: Listen for clear words about cost like cheap or expensive.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • It should save time.: The patch tells you if food is safe, but the speaker does not say it saves time. This is a partial truth trap.
  • It will make money.: There is no mention of profit from selling the patches. This is a distractor trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • manufacture = make
  • cheap = low cost

Question Focus: Advantage of the ripeness sensor project

Passage Reference: That's got to be a quicker way to check for ripeness than taking each box off the shelf and opening it. Definitely.

Why this is correct: The speaker says it is a quicker way to check for ripeness. Faster checking means it saves time, which is the key benefit.

Tips: Words like quicker and faster usually signal a time-saving benefit.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • It will involve very little cost.: Cost is not mentioned for this project. This is a distractor trap.
  • It will make money.: Making profit is not discussed here. This is a context shift trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • quicker = faster
  • scan = check

Question Focus: Advantage of the waste tracking technology

Passage Reference: Their waste tracking technology means that caterers can see how much food is being wasted and why. That'll increase profits for them eventually. Yes.

Why this is correct: The speaker says it will increase profits for caterers. Increasing profits means it will make money.

Tips: Listen carefully for money words like profit, cost, or earnings.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • It will benefit local communities.: Communities are not mentioned here. This is a context shift trap.
  • It should save time.: Time is not discussed. This is a distractor trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • profits = money earned
  • caterers = food service companies

Question Focus: Advantage of the smartphone application

Passage Reference: In the long run, that'll definitely benefit poorer families in the neighborhood.

Why this is correct: The speaker says it will benefit poorer families in the neighborhood. That clearly means it benefits local communities.

Tips: Community words like families and neighborhood often signal social benefits.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • It will make money.: This project focuses on donations, not profit. This is a partial truth trap.
  • It should save time.: Saving time is not mentioned. This is a distractor trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • donation = giving
  • distribute = give out

Question Focus: Advantage of compulsory food waste composting

Passage Reference: we'd be doing something positive about the problem of food waste ourselves, rather than relying on the government to sort it out.

Why this is correct: The speaker says people would act rather than relying on the government. This shows personal responsibility.

Tips: Listen for opinion phrases that show attitudes and responsibility.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • It will benefit local communities.: Community benefit is not the main point here. This is a partial truth trap.
  • It will involve very little cost.: Cost is not discussed. This is a distractor trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • relying on = depending on
  • composting = recycling food waste

General Tips:

  • Read all options first and underline key ideas like time, money, or community.
  • Questions follow the order of the recording, so use the previous answer to predict the next one.
  • Do not choose an option just because one word matches. Focus on the main advantage.
  • Listen for opinion phrases like I thought was great or the other good thing.
  • Eliminate options that are not mentioned at all in the audio.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...