Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
IELTS Practice Listening: Match Headings ID: #57443 Hard Dissertation
Instructions ›
What opinion is expressed about each dissertation? Choose your answers and drag them.

Twentieth Century Architecture-  1

Modern Construction-  2

Steel, Class and Concrete-  3

The Space We Make-  4

Change and Tradition-  5


You will hear a conversation between three students discussing dissertations they have read on 20th century architecture. Now listen carefully and answer the questions. So, Tom, did you manage to get all your reading done? Yes, Ben, I did. What about you, Jane? Me too. Though it took much longer than I thought it would. Yeah, some of those dissertations are really long, aren't they? I'm not looking forward to having to write mine. Well, that's not till next year. So, shall we compare thoughts about our reading? Let's start with 20th century architecture. I thought it was pretty impressive. There was quite a bit of detail. Yeah, all very relevant. I enjoyed the pictures, the diagrams and photos. They were quite strange, not what you'd expect to find in a dissertation, but very helpful. Whereas sometimes I couldn't really follow the arguments. Yes, a bit of a mixed bag, really. While modern construction was very serious and thorough, wasn't it? Indeed. Actually, it was rather dense. I didn't find it particularly easy to read, either. The index was excellent, though, so I used that to guide me around. I still think it was a bit high level. I certainly wouldn't have wanted to try and cope with it in the first year. No. That's not who it's aimed at, of course. What about steel, glass and concrete? Not the world's most interesting title, of course. Again, the index was helpful. Though I think we could have done with more photos. They weren't really enough to support what he was saying in places. Yeah. But what he was saying was easy to follow, wasn't it? He takes you through step by step. It was hard to believe it had been translated. Seemed very natural. Actually, it was better written than the next one, The Space We Make. But we're supposed to be thinking about architectural ideas, not being literary critics. I liked that one. Really? I just didn't think it covered the whole situation. It didn't put the question of housing into the context of the time. You mean... How in the 50s, economic austerity limited the finances available, while a growing population needed housing quickly. Exactly. Again, I think you're asking too much of these dissertations. Perhaps you're right. Well, I did like change and tradition, anyway. Very focused. Yes, although I did think it was oddly arranged in some ways. When you went to the index to track something down, you couldn't necessarily find what you wanted. I know what you mean. But, I have to say, I'd be very proud if I'd written any of these. True. And you will next year.
5 gaps
Options
It has an inadequate index.
It contains unusual illustrations.
It is too detailed in places.
It presents clear arguments.
It contains diagrams which are not clear.
It omits important historical facts.
It is poorly translated.
It contains useful background information.
It is not suitable for new students.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.

Question Focus: Main opinion about the use of visuals in the dissertation

Why this is correct: The speaker clearly focuses on the pictures, diagrams and photos. They say these visuals were quite strange for a dissertation, which matches the idea of unusual illustrations.

Passage Reference: I enjoyed the pictures, the diagrams and photos. They were quite strange, not what you'd expect to find in a dissertation, but very helpful.

Tips: When an option mentions visuals, listen carefully for comments about photos, diagrams, or pictures.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • It is too detailed in places.: Detail is mentioned, but the main opinion here is about visuals, not length or complexity. This is a partial truth trap.
  • It presents clear arguments.: In fact, they say they couldn't really follow the arguments, so this is the opposite meaning. This is a negation trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • illustrations = pictures
  • strange = unusual

Question Focus: Level and target audience of the dissertation

Passage Reference: I still think it was a bit high level. I certainly wouldn't have wanted to try and cope with it in the first year. No. That's not who it's aimed at, of course.

Why this is correct: They say it is high level and clearly say they wouldn't have wanted to cope with it in the first year. This shows it is not suitable for new students.

Tips: Comments about year level or difficulty often signal suitability for students.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • It contains useful background information.: The focus is not on background, but on difficulty level. This is a context shift trap.
  • It has an inadequate index.: They actually say the index was excellent, so this is wrong. This is a negation trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • high level = advanced
  • cope with = manage

Question Focus: How easy the ideas are to follow

Passage Reference: But what he was saying was easy to follow, wasn't it? He takes you through step by step. It was hard to believe it had been translated. Seemed very natural.

Why this is correct: The speaker says the ideas were easy to follow and explained step by step. That directly matches clear arguments.

Tips: Listen for phrases like easy to follow or step by step. These usually point to clarity.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • It is poorly translated.: They say the opposite, that it was hard to believe it had been translated. This is a negation trap.
  • It contains unusual illustrations.: Photos are mentioned, but the key opinion is about clarity of ideas. This is an example-as-main-idea trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • step by step = gradually
  • natural = fluent

Question Focus: Missing historical context

Passage Reference: I just didn't think it covered the whole situation. It didn't put the question of housing into the context of the time. You mean... How in the 50s, economic austerity limited the finances available, while a growing population needed housing quickly.

Why this is correct: They criticise it for not putting housing into the context of the time. This shows it omits important historical facts.

Tips: When you hear criticism about missing context or time period, think about history-related options.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • It contains useful background information.: They say background is missing, not useful. This is a negation trap.
  • It presents clear arguments.: Clarity is not the issue here, context is. This is a context shift trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • context = background
  • austerity = economic difficulty

Question Focus: Problems with organisation and index

Passage Reference: When you went to the index to track something down, you couldn't necessarily find what you wanted.

Why this is correct: They explain that when using the index, you couldn't necessarily find what you wanted. That means the index is inadequate.

Tips: Pay attention to comments about finding information. This often relates to indexes or organisation.

Why the other options are wrong:

  • It is too detailed in places.: Detail level is not discussed here. This is a context shift trap.
  • It contains unusual illustrations.: No mention of visuals at all. This is a distractor trap.

Key Vocabulary:

  • index = contents guide
  • track something down = find

General Tips:

  • Questions follow the order of the recording, so stay focused and do not jump ahead.
  • Listen for opinions, not facts. Words like liked, didn't think, or was impressed are key.
  • Do not match an option just because you hear one similar word. Always check the main idea.
  • Speakers often praise something and then criticise it. The final opinion is usually the answer.
  • Read all options first so you know what kind of opinions to listen for.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Saving...