California’s age of Megafires
A. There’s a reason fire squads now battling more than a dozen blazes in southern California are having such difficulty containing the flames, despite better preparedness than ever and decades of experience fighting fires fanned by the notorious Santa Ana winds. The wildfires themselves, experts say, generally are hotter, move faster, and spread more erratically than in the past.
B. The short-term explanation is that the region, which usually has dry summers, has had nine inches less rain than normal this year. Longer term, climate change across the West is leading to hotter days on average and longer fire seasons. Experts say this is likely to yield more megafires like the conflagrations that this week forced evacuations of at least 300,000 resident in California’s southland and led President Bush to declare a disaster emergency in seven counties on Tuesday.
C. Megafires, also called “siege fires,” are the increasingly frequent blazes that bum 500,000 acres or more – 10 times the size of the average forest fire of 20 years ago. One of the current wildfires is the sixth biggest in California ever, in terms of acreage burned, according to state figures and news reports. The trend to more superhot fires, experts say, has been driven by a century-long policy of the US Forest Service to stop wildfires as quickly as possible. The unintentional consequence was to halt the natural eradication of underbrush, now the primary fuel for megafires. Three other factors contribute to the trend, they add. First is climate change marked by a 1 -degree F. rise in average yearly temperature across the West. Second is a fire season that on average is 78 days longer than in the late 1980s. Third is increased building of homes and other structures in wooded areas.
D. “We are increasingly building our homes … in fire-prone ecosystems,” says Dominik Kulakowski, adjunct professor of biology at Clark University Graduate School of Geography in Worcester, Mass. Doing that “in many of the forests of the Western US … is like building homes on the side of an active volcano.” In California, where population growth has averaged more than 600,000 a year for at least a decade, housing has pushed into such areas. “What once was open space is now residential homes providing fuel to make fires bum with greater intensity,” says Terry McHale of the California Department of Forestry firefighters union. “With so much dryness, so many communities to catch fire, so many fronts to fight, it becomes an almost incredible job.”
E. That said, many experts give California high marks for making progress on preparedness since 2003, when the largest fires in state history scorched 750,000 acres, burned 3,640 homes, and killed 22 people. Stung then by criticism of bungling that allowed fires to spread when they might have been contained, personnel are meeting the peculiar challenges of neighborhood- and canyon-hopping fires better than in recent years, observers say.
F. State promises to provide newer engines, planes, and helicopters have been fulfilled. Firefighters unions that then complained of dilapidated equipment, old fire engines, and insufficient blueprints for fire safety are now praising the state’s commitment, noting that funding for firefighting has increased despite huge cuts in many other programs. “We are pleased that the Schwarzenegger administration has been very proactive in its support of us and come through with budgetary support of the infrastructure needs we have long sought,” says Mr. McHale with the firefighters union.
G. Besides providing money to upgrade the fire engines that must traverse the mammoth state and wind along serpentine canyon roads, the state has invested in better command and-control facilities as well as the strategies to run them. “In the fire sieges of earlier years, we found out that we had the willingness of mutual-aid help from other jurisdictions and states, but we were not able to communicate adequately with them,” says Kim Zagaris, chief of the state’s Office of Emergency Services, fire and rescue branch. After a 2004 blue-ribbon commission examined and revamped those procedures, the statewide response “has become far more professional and responsive,” he says.
H. Besides ordering the California National Guard on Monday to make 1,500 guardsmen available for firefighting efforts, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger asked the Pentagon to send all available Modular Airborne Fighting Systems to the area. The military Lockheed C- 130 cargo/utility aircraft carry a pressurized 3,000-gallon tank that can eject fire retardant or water in fewer than five seconds through two tubes at the rear of the plane. This load can cover an area 1/4 mile long and 60 feet wide to create a fire barrier. Governor Schwarzenegger also directed 2,300 inmate firefighters and 170 custody staff from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to work hand in hand with state and local firefighters.
I. Residents and government officials alike are noting the improvements with gratitude, even amid the loss of homes, churches, businesses, and farms. By Tuesday morning, the fires had burned 1,200 homes and businesses and set 245,957 acres — 384 square miles — ablaze. Despite such losses, there is a sense that he speed, dedication, and coordination of firefighters from several states and jurisdictions are resulting in greater efficiency than in past “siege fire” situations.
J. “I am extraordinarily impressed by the improvements we have witnessed between the last big fire and this,” says Ross Simmons, a San Diego-based lawyer who had to evacuate both his home and business on Monday, taking up residence at a Hampton Inn 30 miles south of his home in Rancho Bernardo. After fires consumed 172,000 acres there in 2003, the San Diego region turned communitywide soul-searching into improved building codes, evacuation procedures, and procurement of new technology. Mr. Simmons and neighbors began receiving automated phone calls at 3:30 a.m. Monday morning telling them to evacuate. “Notwithstanding all the damage that will be caused by this, we will not come close to the loss of life because of what we have … put in place since then,” he says.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Question Focus: Attitude question - how experts feel about California's performance after 2003
Correct Answer: C
Why this is correct: The passage clearly says experts give California high marks and have made progress on preparedness since 2003. This shows a positive attitude about improvement, not blame or criticism.
Passage Reference: That said, many experts give California high marks for making progress on preparedness since 2003, when the largest fires in state history scorched 750,000 acres... Stung then by criticism of bungling that allowed fires to spread when they might have been contained, personnel are meeting the peculiar challenges of neighborhood- and canyon-hopping fires better than in recent years, observers say.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'give California high marks for making progress on preparedness' = Option: 'Improvement made on preparation'
Tips: For attitude questions, look for opinion words like praise, criticism, or impressed.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Students may choose this because experts mention past problems. However, the passage says California is doing better than in recent years, not that they failed again. This is a time/tense trap.
- B: This sounds serious, but experts do not blame California for casualties. Instead, they praise improved preparedness. This is a Not Given trap.
- D: There was criticism in 2003, but the question asks about attitude after 2003. Experts now give high marks. This is a wrong section trap.
Key Vocabulary:
- preparedness = readiness
- bungling = doing something badly
Question Focus: Detail question - what Governor Schwarzenegger did for firefighting
Correct Answer: B
Passage Reference: Governor Schwarzenegger also directed 2,300 inmate firefighters and 170 custody staff from the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation to work hand in hand with state and local firefighters.
Why this is correct: The passage clearly states that Schwarzenegger directed inmate firefighters and custody staff to work together with local firefighters. This directly matches the option.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'directed 2,300 inmate firefighters and 170 custody staff to work hand in hand' = Option: 'led many prison management staff to work together with local fire fighters'
Tips: For detail questions, match exact actions and numbers. Small word changes often hide wrong answers.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Students may pick this because the passage mentions the Pentagon and military aircraft. However, it talks about airborne firefighting systems, not weapons. This is a paraphrase trap.
- C: This is the opposite of what the passage says. The governor took many active steps to help. This is a contradiction trap.
- D: The passage mentions 1,500 guardsmen, not office clerks. This changes the meaning. This is a paraphrase trap.
Key Vocabulary:
- directed = ordered
- custody staff = prison officers
Question Focus: Detail question - what happened to Ross Simmons on the day of the fire
Correct Answer: D
Passage Reference: Mr. Simmons and neighbors began receiving automated phone calls at 3:30 a.m. Monday morning telling them to evacuate.
Why this is correct: The passage clearly says Ross Simmons was alerted by automated phone calls early in the morning. This matches being alarmed by machine calls.
Paraphrasing: Passage: 'receiving automated phone calls' = Option: 'alarmed by machine calls'
Tips: Do not add your own ideas. If the passage does not clearly say it, do not choose it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Students may imagine he was sleeping, but the passage never says this. This is a Not Given trap.
- B: He stayed at a Hampton Inn after evacuating, but he was not doing business there. This is a context shift trap.
- C: There is no mention of any employee death. This is a Not Given trap.
Key Vocabulary:
- automated = done by machine
- evacuate = leave for safety
General Tips:
- MCQ questions follow passage order, so later questions appear later in the text.
- Always read all options before choosing. The first one that sounds right may be a trap.
- Watch for attitude words like praise, blame, impressed, or criticism.
- Do not use real-world knowledge. Only trust what the passage clearly states.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation