Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
IELTS Practice Reading: True, False, Not Given ID: #56434 Medium Stuffed
Instructions ›
Do the following statements agree with the information given in the reading passage?
TRUE if the statement agrees with the information
FALSE if the statement contradicts the information
NOT GIVEN if there is no information on this
Tap any word for its meaning

Stuffed

The British seem to be going off chocolate, but some bits of the market are doing deliciously well. It’s usually nice to top an international league, but perhaps not this one. In the matter of chocolate consumption, Britain is the most self-indulgent country among the world’s big economies.

That may not last. Perhaps brow-beaten by the obesity scaremonger^, perhaps disgusted by their inability to see their toes, the British seem to be going off chocolate. The market has been static for five years and this is troubling Nestle, Cadbury and Master-foods, the three firms that dominate the British industry. "It's a saturated market,” says Jeremy Cunnington, an analyst for Euro monitor, a market research agency. "Penetration has gone as far as it can.” Mintel, another market research firm, agrees, predicting a slight drop in sales volume by 2006. With profits constrained by tight pricing on supermarket shelves, firms will focus more and more on extending a few super brands with lasting appeal, subsuming existing products into them and trying to improve sales value rather than volume.

If they do, it will continue a trend towards emphasising established brand names instead of new ones. Cadbury has stopped selling its Caramel products under their old names, bundling them under the Dairy Milk brand instead. Nestle has been tinkering with its own big name, Kit Kat. A new version of the snack, Chunky, was launched in 1999, followed by bite-sized Kubes in 2003. There was even talk recently of a lemon cheesecake flavour — apparently popular with the Japanese and the Germans.

Not all the news is gloomy, though. There are lively niche markets, where consumers’ sharpening social consciences and growing fondness for luxury have been lifting sales.

Clever companies satisfy both at once. Green & Black’s, a small firm that sells expensive, organic GM-free chocolate, has seen its sales rise five-fold since 1999 to £23.4m in 2003. The firm has recently been moving away from its green roots to focus on its premium credentials, but “organic” and “premium'’ arc linked in many people’s minds.

The "fair trade” segment is another impressive performer. Such organizations guarantee producers in poor countries a minimum price, shielding them from the ups and downs of the world cocoa market. Figures from the Fair Trade Foundation show that Britain ate just over 1,000 tonnes of their chocolate in 2003, up from 82 tonnes in 1998 — a 12-fold increase in five years, albeit from a very low base. The big players are beginning to cotton on, with the Co-op, a supermarket chain, announcing in 2002 that it would source all its own-brand chocolate from "fair trade” suppliers. Most British supermarkets now offer some sort of “fair trade" chocolate.

So wall posh, socially responsible chocolate conquers the market? Unlikely, says Mr. Cunnington. Luxury firms do not compete directly against the big companies — indeed their products have little in common. Most British chocolate contains vegetable solids, and tastes quite different from the “real" chocolate that the luxury firms offer. As for “fair trade”, higher prices for producers mean higher prices for consumers, limiting its appeal to a cost-conscious public. Although the two sectors are expected to continue growing strongly, they are unlikely to escape from their niches. The cocoa-leaf readers see a future of consolidation, limited innovation and a gentle decline in sales volume. Lemon cheesecake Kit Kats all round, then.

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.

Question Focus: Contradiction - Britain leading consumption

Correct Answer: FALSE

Why this is correct: The passage clearly says Britain is the most self-indulgent country for chocolate consumption. This directly contradicts the statement saying Britain no longer leads. Because the passage says the opposite, the answer is FALSE.

Passage Reference: It's usually nice to top an international league, but perhaps not this one. In the matter of chocolate consumption, Britain is the most self-indulgent country among the world's big economies.

Common Mistake: Students sometimes choose NOT GIVEN because later the passage says Britain may eat less in the future. But future decline does not change the current situation. This is a Time/tense trap.

Paraphrasing: Passage: 'the most self-indulgent country' = Statement: 'leads the world'

Tips: Check whether the statement talks about now or the future. Time words often decide TRUE or FALSE.

Key Vocabulary:

  • self-indulgent = consuming a lot
  • economies = countries' financial systems

Question Focus: Scope - British industry vs world

Correct Answer: NOT GIVEN

Passage Reference: The market has been static for five years and this is troubling Nestle, Cadbury and Master-foods, the three firms that dominate the British industry.

Why this is correct: The passage only says these companies dominate the British industry. It does not say anything about them being the biggest producers in the world. The passage does not discuss whether this global claim is true.

Common Mistake: Students often mark this TRUE by assuming big British companies must also be the biggest globally. This uses outside knowledge and is a Not Given trap.

Paraphrasing: Passage: 'dominate the British industry' = Statement: 'biggest producers in the world'

Tips: Do not add world-level information if the passage only talks about one country.

Key Vocabulary:

  • dominate = control
  • industry = business sector

Question Focus: Contradiction - value vs volume

Correct Answer: FALSE

Passage Reference: With profits constrained by tight pricing on supermarket shelves, firms will focus more and more on extending a few super brands with lasting appeal, subsuming existing products into them and trying to improve sales value rather than volume.

Why this is correct: The statement says firms will increase profits by selling more amount. The passage says the opposite - they will improve sales value rather than volume. That is a clear contradiction, so the answer is FALSE.

Common Mistake: Students sometimes miss the contrast between value and volume and choose TRUE. This is a Paraphrase trap.

Paraphrasing: Passage: 'value rather than volume' = Statement: 'boosting the amount of sales'

Tips: Watch for contrast words like 'rather than'. They often signal a FALSE answer.

Key Vocabulary:

  • volume = quantity
  • constrained = limited

Question Focus: Direct statement - established brands

Correct Answer: TRUE

Passage Reference: If they do, it will continue a trend towards emphasising established brand names instead of new ones.

Why this is correct: The passage clearly states firms will emphasise established brand names instead of new ones. This directly matches the statement, so the answer is TRUE.

Common Mistake: Some students overthink and look for examples instead of trusting this clear sentence. That can lead to unnecessary doubt.

Paraphrasing: Passage: 'established brand names' = Statement: 'well-known brands'

Tips: When the passage clearly states the idea in one sentence, do not look for hidden meaning.

Key Vocabulary:

  • established = well-known
  • emphasising = focusing on

Question Focus: Contradiction - strong sales of expensive chocolate

Correct Answer: FALSE

Passage Reference: Green & Black's, a small firm that sells expensive, organic GM-free chocolate, has seen its sales rise five-fold since 1999 to £23.4m in 2003.

Why this is correct: The statement says expensive chocolate is hard to sell. The passage says sales of expensive chocolate rose five-fold. This is the opposite meaning, so the answer is FALSE.

Common Mistake: Students may generalise from later comments about high prices limiting appeal. That mixes different ideas and is a Context shift trap.

Paraphrasing: Passage: 'sales rise five-fold' = Statement: 'find it hard to sell'

Tips: Use numbers and trends in the passage. Strong growth usually signals a FALSE answer to negative statements.

Key Vocabulary:

  • five-fold = five times
  • premium = high quality and expensive

Question Focus: Future prediction - decline in volume

Correct Answer: FALSE

Passage Reference: The cocoa-leaf readers see a future of consolidation, limited innovation and a gentle decline in sales volume.

Why this is correct: The statement predicts more innovation and increasing sales volume. The passage predicts limited innovation and a decline in sales volume. This is a clear contradiction, so the answer is FALSE.

Common Mistake: Students sometimes assume innovation always increases sales. That is outside knowledge and causes a Causation trap.

Paraphrasing: Passage: 'limited innovation' and 'decline in sales volume' = Statement: 'more innovation' and 'increase in sales volume'

Tips: For future predictions, read the final paragraphs carefully. Writers often summarise their view there.

Key Vocabulary:

  • consolidation = companies joining or shrinking in number
  • decline = decrease

General Tips:

  • TFNG questions follow passage order. Use the location of the previous answer to find the next one faster.
  • If the passage clearly says the opposite, choose FALSE. If it simply does not answer the exact claim, choose NOT GIVEN.
  • Do not use your own knowledge or assumptions. Only use what is written in the passage.
  • Pay close attention to words about quantity like 'volume', 'value', 'increase', and 'decline'.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
Saving...