Transcript:
Result:
Explanation
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct Answer: A
Why this is correct: Ruby regrets when they set the practice. She says 'Why did I think it was a good idea to have our practice run through on Tuesday evening?' - it leaves no time to fix problems. This matches Option A.
Tips: Regret shows in phrases like why did I do that.
Why the other options are wrong:
- C: Option C is wrong because the projector is only a worry, not something she regrets using. This is a lexical overlap trap.
- B: Option B is wrong because she worries if Jonathan has a problem, but does not regret choosing him. This is an inference trap.
Correct Answer: C
Why this is correct: Leo praises her skill at picking people. He says 'You get the best out of people, Ruby', after noting she chose the right person for each role. This is Option C.
Tips: Match the praise to the right person - not everything said is about Ruby.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Option A is wrong because clear speaking describes Alex, not Ruby. This is a lexical overlap trap.
- B: Option B is wrong because 'look on the bright side' is encouragement, not calling her pessimistic. This is an inference trap.
Correct Answer: B
Why this is correct: The teacher says she saw this coming. She says 'To be honest, I was expecting this conversation'. This matches Option B.
Tips: Expecting it means she was not surprised - she anticipated it.
Why the other options are wrong:
- C: Option C is wrong because the student mentions friends switching, but she does not call it common. This is a lexical overlap trap.
- A: Option A is wrong because she never says she changed majors herself. This is a detail-vs-gist trap.
Correct Answer: A
Why this is correct: They agree he should try a class first. She suggests 'signing up for the class I'm running next semester' to confirm the switch. This is Option A.
Tips: The next step is the first thing they decide to do now.
Why the other options are wrong:
- B: Option B is wrong because admissions is for fee questions, not the agreed next step. This is a detail-vs-gist trap.
- C: Option C is wrong because he will talk to his family later, in the vacation, not as the next step. This is a correction trap.
Correct Answer: C
Why this is correct: They are suggesting reasons for the facts. They discuss why birds lost weight, saying it 'could be partly a kind of emergency reaction'. This matches Option C.
Tips: When speakers say could be or the idea that, they are explaining, not arguing.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Option A is wrong because the studies are established, not framed as controversial new evidence. This is a detail-vs-gist trap.
- B: Option B is wrong because they agree with the professor - 'Yeah, that's what the professor was saying'. This is an inference trap.
Correct Answer: C
Why this is correct: The main point is that smaller size can help birds. A smaller body 'allows birds and mammals to cool the body more effectively', which is a benefit. This is Option C.
Tips: A potential benefit means something that could help - listen for helps or allows.
Why the other options are wrong:
- B: Option B is wrong because it is body weight that fell, not the bird population. This is a lexical overlap trap.
- A: Option A is wrong because all 77 species lost weight; no point is made about differences between them. This is a detail-vs-gist trap.
Correct Answer: C
Why this is correct: He is annoyed he missed the message. His phone was not charging, so he asks 'When did that come through?' about the news. This matches Option C.
Tips: The reason he is annoyed is the fact he only just found out.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Option A is wrong because he understood the deadline; he just missed the extension message. This is a lexical overlap trap.
- B: Option B is wrong because he worked hard all night; he did not waste his time. This is an inference trap.
Correct Answer: A
Why this is correct: She tells him to tidy it up, not redo it. She says 'limit your time to a couple more hours' and add finishing touches. This matches Option A.
Tips: The advice she keeps is different from the ideas she turns down.
Why the other options are wrong:
- B: Option B is wrong because she says 'I'd offer to look over it myself if I had time' - but she cannot. This is a correction trap.
- C: Option C is wrong because he suggests redoing one section, but she says 'don't do that'. This is a correction trap.
Correct Answer: B
Why this is correct: The tutor jumps on a point that suits her view. When Mark agrees chatting is good, she says 'face-to-face delivery does actually facilitate a better learning environment'. This matches Option B.
Tips: Notice when a speaker takes the other's remark and turns it to their own view.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Option A is wrong because she does not simply concede his argument; she uses part of it for her own side. This is an inference trap.
- C: Option C is wrong because she never says his view is wrong or misinformed. This is an inference trap.
Correct Answer: B
Why this is correct: She hints the chats are worth more than students realise. She says there is 'a place for both, the formalised seminar and the seemingly useless chat'. This matches Option B.
Tips: Seemingly useless hints the chat is more useful than it looks.
Why the other options are wrong:
- A: Option A is wrong because she values both seminars and chats, not chat over seminars. This is a correction trap.
- C: Option C is wrong because she compares the chat to the workplace water cooler positively, not saying uni chat is better. This is a lexical overlap trap.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation