What reality TV says about our culture
You may call reality TV a ‘guilty pleasure’ or, if you’re feeling less charitable, ‘trash’ or ‘train-wreck TV,’ or perhaps, like the respected broadcast journalist Ted Koppel, you may wonder aloud if the genre marks the end of civilization. The truth is that vastly more of us are watching reality TV than not, and those who avert their eyes are still haunted by its apparitions. One study found that college students who claimed not to watch reality TV still knew specific details about these shows. But even for those who really don’t watch, these programs have become part of the cultural ether. Elements from them reach us via product lines, online posts, advertisements, snippets of conversation, and references in the media.
We know why reality TV shows keep getting produced. They’re relatively quick and cheap to make, and they’re potentially very profitable. From the supply side, it’s a no-brainer. But why do we keep tuning in? Research has suggested that people get several different ‘gratifications’ from these programs. Though we might not wish to admit it, one of these is voyeuristic pleasure. We're excited and curious to watch people in their unguarded moments, particularly when we suspect there might be a disaster on the horizon. But paradoxically, another reason people tune in is for social connection. This connection happens when fans hold viewing parties, chat with their friends about developments on the shows, and engage with the content through interactive websites, social media feeds, and message boards.
Of course, there are other things we could be watching. But one unique appeal of this genre is that it involves real people reacting to (more or less) real-world stimuli, which facilitates our putting ourselves in the participants’ shoes in ways that scripted TV does not. Archetypes, the lifeblood of reality TV, further help us to make connections with these characters. Disparate and over-the-top personalities who fit into broad, easily recognizable social categories (Mom, Cheerleader, Nerd) are sought out by producers to form the vertebrae of many of these shows. And indeed, the performers themselves grab hold of these archetypes and play up to them.
It may seem counterintuitive that a genre focused on zany personalities and extreme cases could have anything to teach a sociologist about our own ordinary lives. Yet scholars have long argued that we can learn about core features of society by looking at the extremes. The same behaviors that make reality TV participants fascinating to watch are also present within our culture. These people are larger-than-life versions, for instance, of our own materialism, our obsessions with our bodies, and the steps we take to mold our children in our own images. In presenting these people, the reality genre turns over stones that scripted programming leave undisturbed. These programs cast a searchlight on the center as well as the hidden nooks of society. Reality TV’s perimeter is not all-encompassing, but even its absences are instructive.
For all of its larger-than-life aspects, the genre reflects how dearly we cling to simplistic, collective notions about who and what is legitimate and ‘real.’ It spotlights the categories and meanings that we take for granted as essential, biological, and unshakable. But in doing so, it allows us to poke at these ideas, revealing the socially constructed natures of what we consider to be ‘true,’ ‘normal,’ ‘healthy,’ ‘legitimate,’ and ‘good’—in areas ranging from relationships to wealth or child rearing. In effect, it exposes reality itself to be a social fiction. To be clear, to point out that many of our everyday distinctions are social fictions is not to suggest they are unimportant. Just the opposite: these fictions shape our experiences of the world in crucial ways. As the sociologists W. I. Thomas and Dorothy Swaine Thomas have pointed out, ‘If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences.’ Many of the categories we use to organize our worlds are at once ‘unreal’ in that they are socially manufactured and ‘real’ in that they impact our lives. Reality TV, has much to teach us about those unreal realities.
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Question Focus: Asks what 'haunted by its apparitions' emphasises (Functional).
Correct Answer: B
Why this is correct: Option b is correct because the phrase stresses that even people who avoid reality TV cannot escape it - it reaches them anyway. The study of non-watchers who still knew details backs this up. So the image shows how impossible it is to stay untouched.
Question Focus: Asks what the writer suggests about people's motives for watching (Inference).
Correct Answer: C
Why this is correct: Option c is right because the writer sets a slightly shameful motive - voyeurism, which 'we might not wish to admit' - against a positive one, social connection. That infers some motives are more worthwhile than others. This is an Inference question about how the reasons compare.
Question Focus: Asks what the writer implies about reality TV in the third paragraph (Inference).
Correct Answer: D
Why this is correct: Here, option d is correct because the writer quietly implies that the behaviour is not fully genuine: the stimuli are only 'more or less' real, and performers 'play up to' their types. So what we see is partly an act. This is an Inference question - the doubt is suggested, not stated.
Question Focus: Asks what studying reality TV reveals, according to the writer (Attribution / Detail).
Correct Answer: A
Why this is correct: Option a is correct because the writer says these extreme people show bigger versions of what most of us share - our materialism, body worries and parenting habits. So studying them reveals the attitudes and concerns of ordinary society. Looking at extremes teaches us about the middle.
Question Focus: Asks what the writer says watching reality TV does in paragraph five (Inference).
Correct Answer: A
Why this is correct: The answer is option a because 'poke at these ideas' means we get to question the things we take for granted - our assumptions. The paragraph shows reality TV exposing 'truths' as things people simply built. So it gives us a chance to challenge them.
Question Focus: Asks which idea recurs across paragraphs (Synthesis).
Correct Answer: C
Why this is correct: Option c is correct because across the whole text the writer builds one thread: reality TV deserves to be taken seriously as a subject of study. Studies, research and sociologists appear in paragraph after paragraph, and he keeps saying it 'has much to teach us.' This is a Synthesis question about the recurring idea.
General Tips:
- The right answer almost never copies the text word for word. It says the same idea in different words, so hunt for matching meaning, not matching vocabulary.
- Notice when the writer reports what scholars and studies say and when the writer gives a personal view. Attribution matters even when the 'expert' is a whole group of researchers.
- For inference questions, ask yourself: does the text actually point to this, or am I just using my own general knowledge? Your answer must be backed by a clue in the passage.
- Watch out for options that use real words from the text but bend them to the wrong meaning, wrong person, or wrong paragraph. Right words do not always mean the right answer.
- For the final question, step back and look at the whole article. The answer usually pulls together ideas from more than one paragraph, so think about the writer's big message.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation