In an age characterised by rapid social and economic transformation, the intelligence quotient has a subject of profound debate. While a substantial propoertion of society advocates that a genius is by birth, a considerable number of others assert that a true expert is the result of years of study and practice. This essay will systematically scrutinise both perspectives, evaluate their underlying implications, and articulate a cogent and well-reasoned personal standpoint. On the one hand, advocates of genius born at birth firmly contend that these people have been blessed by almighty God and by virtue they will master in any field. Moreover, certain scientists, namely Isacc Newton, Robbert Hook, and many more were born with the ability to win the world. The biggest example of this is the founder of sikh religion, Guru Nanak Dev ji, he was god- gifted child and led to the foundation of one of the largest religion in the world. Conversely, opponents argue that becoming a expert needs a dedication alongwith patience. Furthermore, it is asserted that they will concentrate more on academic, ultimately boosting their professional journey. In conclusion, while it is undeniable that both perspectives present compelling arguments, I firmly maintain that for being a savant, they should adopt a more balanced approach that integrates both God's gift and hard-work in a structured manner and will benefit them by fostering greater potential for both professional and social development.