The growing influence of testing different biological products on animals has became a crucial issue as it continues to spark controversy and attract wide spread public attention. While some individuals argue that this approach is essential for human's safety, others remain sceptical about animal's rights. This essay will discuss both perspectives and explain why one maybe more convincing than the other. Admittedly, as we are humans and one of our main character is mercy, we should take into account animal's rights. From one stand point, for instance, this research method should be used in a resposible way. As a result, scientists should carry out many trials in lab to ensure the minimal harm would affect the animals under trial. On the other hand, it is undeniable that human's lives are on top of any research outcomes. Any new lab trials should be near 100% of certainity of their benefits to human beings. As civilisation grow older, it is expected that human's life would be longer with ease of pain and less diseases. To sum up, while animal's rights reflect our human nature, this trend will always fall short of acheiving the desired outcomes if implemented without proper oversight. Scientists and governments should seize the opportunity presented by technological advancement to mitigate the drwabacks associated with misuse of animal's lives. Moving forward, these challenges should be addressed through appropriate policies and regulations. In my opinion, a balanced approach of both arguments would ensure a more sustainable future and neither should be adopted in isolation.