Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in the Blanks (Dropdown) ID: #31527 Foreign Policy
Instructions ›
Below is a text with blanks. Click on each blank, a list of choices will appear. Select the appropriate choice for each blank.
The  foreign  policy  of  a  state,  it  is  often  argued,  begins  and  ends  with  the  border.  No  doubt  an  exaggeration,  this  aphorism  nevertheless  has  an    of  truth.  A  state's  relationship  with  its  neighbours,  at  least  in  the    years,  are  greatly    by  its  frontier  policy,  especially  when  there  are  no    borders.  Empire  builders  in  the  past  sought  to  extend  imperial  frontiers  for  a  variety  of  reasons;  the  subjugation  of  kings  and  princes  to  gain  their    (as  well  as  handsome  tributes  or  the  coffers  of  the  state),  and,  the  security  of  the  'core'  of  the  empire  from  external  attacks  by  establishing  a  string  of  buffer  states  in  areas    the  frontiers.  The  history  of  the  British  Empire  in  India  was  no  different.  It  is  important  to  note  in  this  connection  that  the  concept  of  international  boundaries  (between  two  sovereign  states),  demarcated  and  delineated,  was  yet  to  emerge  in  India  under  the  Mughal  rule.

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: element

Explanation: The word 'element' fits grammatically as a noun that refers to a fundamental or essential part of something, aligning with the context of the aphorism discussing the truth about foreign policy. It indicates that there is a basic aspect of truth in the statement about borders.

Meaning: 'Element' means a basic or essential part of something, suggesting that there is a significant truth in the aphorism regarding foreign policy and borders.

Wrong options:

  • refer: The verb 'refer' does not fit grammatically as it requires a subject and does not convey a noun form that would complete the sentence meaningfully.
  • handle: The verb 'handle' implies managing or dealing with something, which does not align with the context of discussing a fundamental truth.
  • stirred: The past participle 'stirred' suggests a physical action or emotional response, which does not fit the context of discussing an aspect of truth.
Correct answer: formative

Explanation: The word 'formative' is an adjective that describes the early years of a state, indicating a period that shapes or influences its development. This fits contextually as it refers to the crucial early years in establishing relationships with neighbors.

Meaning: 'Formative' means relating to the development or formation of something, particularly in its early stages, emphasizing the importance of these years in shaping a state's foreign policy.

Wrong options:

  • discuss: The verb 'discuss' does not fit grammatically as it does not describe a time period and is not an adjective that would modify 'years.'
  • inclusive: The adjective 'inclusive' suggests something that includes a variety of elements, which does not specifically relate to the developmental aspect of early years.
  • decisive: While 'decisive' implies a significant impact, it does not convey the idea of development or shaping that 'formative' does.
Correct answer: influenced

Explanation: The word 'influenced' is the past participle of the verb 'influence,' which fits grammatically and contextually as it describes how a state's frontier policy affects its relationships with neighbors. It indicates a change or effect caused by the policy.

Meaning: 'Influenced' means to have an effect on the character, development, or behavior of someone or something, highlighting the impact of frontier policy on relationships.

Wrong options:

  • managed: The verb 'managed' implies control or administration, which does not accurately describe the effect of a policy on relationships in this context.
  • subscribed: The verb 'subscribed' suggests agreement or support, which does not fit the context of describing how relationships are affected by policy.
  • affected: While 'affected' is similar in meaning, it does not fit grammatically as well as 'influenced' does in this context.
Correct answer: settled

Explanation: The word 'settled' is an adjective that describes borders that are established and recognized. It fits grammatically and contextually as it refers to the absence of clear and defined borders, which is crucial to the meaning of the sentence.

Meaning: 'Settled' means established or fixed, indicating that there are no clearly defined borders in the context discussed.

Wrong options:

  • satellite: The noun 'satellite' refers to an object orbiting another, which does not relate to the concept of borders and is irrelevant in this context.
  • set: The adjective 'set' implies something that is fixed but does not convey the specific meaning of established borders as 'settled' does.
  • stated: The past participle 'stated' suggests something that has been declared, which does not fit the context of describing the nature of borders.
Correct answer: allegiance

Explanation: The word 'allegiance' is a noun that refers to loyalty or commitment to a sovereign or government. It fits grammatically and contextually as it describes what empire builders sought from kings and princes, aligning with the theme of loyalty in governance.

Meaning: 'Allegiance' means loyalty or devotion to a ruler or state, indicating the relationship between the empire builders and the local rulers they sought to control.

Wrong options:

  • elegant: The adjective 'elegant' describes something graceful or stylish, which does not fit the context of loyalty or political relationships.
  • aspiration: The noun 'aspiration' refers to a hope or ambition, which does not convey the idea of loyalty or commitment required in this context.
  • execution: The noun 'execution' refers to carrying out a plan or order, which does not relate to the concept of loyalty or allegiance.
Correct answer: adjoining

Explanation: The word 'adjoining' is an adjective that describes something that is next to or in contact with something else. It fits grammatically and contextually as it refers to areas that are next to the frontiers, emphasizing their geographical relationship.

Meaning: 'Adjoining' means being next to or connected with something else, indicating the proximity of buffer states to the frontiers.

Wrong options:

  • bringing: The verb 'bringing' does not fit grammatically as it implies an action rather than describing a spatial relationship.
  • capturing: The verb 'capturing' suggests taking control of something, which does not relate to the geographical context of the areas next to the frontiers.
  • stating: The verb 'stating' implies declaring or expressing something, which does not fit the context of describing geographical proximity.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...