Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in the Blanks (Dropdown) ID: #31559 English Language
Instructions ›
Below is a text with blanks. Click on each blank, a list of choices will appear. Select the appropriate choice for each blank.
With  about  one  and  a  half  billion  non-native  speakers,  English  has  become  the  world's  own  language.  Such    has  its  downside,  of  course.  There  are  now  about  6,800  languages  left  in  the  world,  compared  with  perhaps    that  number  back  at  the  dawn  of  agriculture.  Thanks  in    to  the  rise  of  uber-languages,  most  importantly  English,  the  remaining  languages  are  now  dying  at  the    of  about  one  a  fortnight.  Want  to  learn  Busuu,  anyone?  Then  you'd  better  head  to  Cameroon  fast,  before  one  of  the  language's  last  eight  speakers  kicks  the  bucket  (as  the  Busuu-nese  presumably  doesn't  say).

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: dominance

Explanation: The word 'dominance' fits grammatically as a noun that describes the state of having power or influence over others, which aligns with the context of English being a global language. It also matches the sentiment of the sentence, indicating a significant impact on the world's linguistic landscape.

Meaning: 'Dominance' refers to the condition of being more powerful or influential than others, particularly in a social or cultural context.

Wrong options:

  • power: While 'power' could imply strength, it does not specifically convey the idea of control over languages as 'dominance' does.
  • idea: The term 'idea' is too vague and does not relate to the context of language influence; it lacks the necessary specificity.
  • subject: 'Subject' refers to a topic or theme, which does not fit the context of discussing the influence of a language.
Correct answer: twice

Explanation: The word 'twice' is the correct choice as it indicates a numerical comparison, suggesting that the number of languages was double in the past compared to the present. This fits grammatically and contextually with the sentence's structure.

Meaning: 'Twice' means two times, indicating that the number of languages was two times greater in the past.

Wrong options:

  • rise: The word 'rise' does not fit grammatically as it is a verb and does not provide a numerical comparison needed in this context.
  • firstly: 'Firstly' is an adverb used to introduce a point, which does not align with the need for a numerical descriptor in this sentence.
  • never: 'Never' implies a negative condition and does not provide the comparative context required here.
Correct answer: part

Explanation: The word 'part' fits grammatically as a noun indicating a portion or segment of something, which aligns with the phrase 'thanks in part to,' a common idiomatic expression that conveys a contribution to a situation.

Meaning: 'Part' refers to a portion of something, indicating that the rise of uber-languages contributes to the situation described.

Wrong options:

  • rare: 'Rare' is an adjective that does not fit grammatically in this context, as it does not convey the idea of contribution.
  • start: 'Start' is a verb and does not fit the grammatical structure needed here; it does not indicate a portion of something.
  • bother: 'Bother' is a verb that implies annoyance and does not fit the context of expressing gratitude for a contribution.
Correct answer: rate

Explanation: The word 'rate' is the correct choice as it is a noun that describes the speed or frequency of an occurrence, which fits perfectly in the context of languages dying at a specific frequency.

Meaning: 'Rate' refers to the speed at which something happens, in this case, the loss of languages.

Wrong options:

  • state: 'State' refers to a condition or situation and does not convey the idea of frequency or speed required in this context.
  • wait: 'Wait' is a verb that does not fit grammatically or contextually, as it does not relate to the concept of frequency.
  • great: 'Great' is an adjective that does not fit the grammatical structure needed here; it does not convey a measurable frequency.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...