Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in the Blanks (Dropdown) ID: #36550 Silicon Valley
Instructions ›
Below is a text with blanks. Click on each blank, a list of choices will appear. Select the appropriate choice for each blank.
To  describe  Alan  Adler  as  a  Silicon  Valley  entrepreneur  is  both  accurate  and  slightly  misleading.  He  is  electronics  engineer  with  a  record  in  innovation.  He    at  Stanford  University.  His  company  is  in  Palo  Alto,  four  minutes’  drive  from  Google,  where  he  has  given  talks  on  his  work.  His  home,  where  he  does  his    is  in  Los  Altos,  close  to  the  garage  where  Steve  Jobs  and  Steve  Wozniak  started  Apple.
But  the  killer  product  Mr  Adler  created,  and  which    the  Bentley  on  his  drive  and  the  beach  house  at  Carmel-by-the-Sea,  is  not  even  electrical,    a  $32  plastic  molded  one-cup  coffeemaker,  manufactured  locally  –  and  found  in  4m  homes  and  offices  in  60  countries.

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: has lectured

Explanation: The phrase 'has lectured' is in the present perfect tense, which is appropriate here as it indicates an action that occurred at an unspecified time in the past and has relevance to the present. This aligns with the context of describing Alan Adler's ongoing contributions as an engineer and lecturer.

Meaning: 'Has lectured' means that Alan Adler has given lectures in the past and continues to be recognized for his expertise.

Wrong options:

  • was lecturing: This option is in the past continuous tense, which suggests an ongoing action in the past, not fitting the context of his completed lectures.
  • has been lectured: This passive construction implies that others have lectured him, which is not the intended meaning here.
  • would lecture: This conditional form suggests a hypothetical situation, which does not accurately describe his actual past actions.
Correct answer: inventing

Explanation: The gerund 'inventing' fits grammatically as it serves as a noun describing the activity he engages in at home. This aligns with the context of his work as an innovator and inventor.

Meaning: 'Inventing' refers to the process of creating new devices or methods, which is central to Alan Adler's role as an engineer.

Wrong options:

  • invention: This noun form does not fit grammatically as it would require a different structure in the sentence, such as 'his invention' which is not used here.
  • recording: This option refers to the act of capturing audio or video, which is unrelated to the context of his work as an engineer.
  • computing: This term relates to the use of computers and does not accurately describe the creative process he is involved in.
Correct answer: paid for

Explanation: The phrase 'paid for' correctly indicates that Mr. Adler financially supported the purchase of the Bentley and beach house, fitting the context of the sentence. It is a phrasal verb that conveys the action of making a payment for something.

Meaning: 'Paid for' means that he spent money to acquire the Bentley and beach house, highlighting his financial success.

Wrong options:

  • used for: This phrase does not convey the action of purchasing and instead suggests a purpose, which does not fit the context of the sentence.
  • spent on: While this option is close, it does not convey the completion of the transaction as effectively as 'paid for.'
  • purchased from: This implies a source or seller, which is not relevant in this context where the focus is on the act of payment.
Correct answer: but

Explanation: The conjunction 'but' is used to introduce a contrast, which is essential in this context to highlight the surprising nature of the product being discussed. It connects two contrasting ideas effectively.

Meaning: 'But' indicates a contrast or exception, suggesting that despite Mr. Adler's impressive background, the product is unexpectedly simple.

Wrong options:

  • instead: This word implies a replacement or alternative, which does not fit the contrasting relationship needed in this context.
  • actually: While this word can indicate a contrast, it does not serve as a conjunction to connect the two clauses as effectively as 'but.'
  • in spite of: This phrase introduces a concession but does not function as a conjunction to connect the two clauses directly.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...