Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in the Blanks (Dropdown) ID: #38550 Nea nderthals
Instructions ›
Below is a text with blanks. Click on each blank, a list of choices will appear. Select the appropriate choice for each blank.
Neanderthals    have    been    misunderstood.    The    early    humanoids    traditionally    characterized    as    ape-like    brutes    were    deeply    emotional    beings    with    high-    pitched    voices.    They    may    even    have    sung    to    each    other.    This    new    image    has    from    two    studies    of    the    vocal    apparatus    and    anatomy    of    the    creatures    that  .    Europe    between    200,000    and    35,000    years    ago.    The    research    shows    that    Neanderthal    voices    might    well    have    produced    loud,    womanly    and    highly    melodic    sounds    -    not    the    roars    and    grunts    previously    by    most    researchers.    Stephen    Mithen,    Professor    of    Archaeology    and    author    of    one    of    the    studies,    said:    ‘What    is    emerging    is    a    picture    of    an    intelligent    and    emotionally    complex    creature    whose    most    likely    from  of    communication    would    have    been    part    language    and    part    song.’    Mithen’s    work    with    the    first    detailed    study    of    a    reconstructed    Neanderthal    skeleton.    Anthropologists    brought    together    bones    and    casts    from    several    sites    to    re-create    the    creature.    The    creature    that    emerges    would    have    markedly    from    humans.    Neanderthals    seem    to    have    had    an    extremely    powerful    and    no    waist.    

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: resulted

Explanation: The word 'resulted' fits grammatically as it indicates a consequence of the studies mentioned. It aligns with the past tense used in the sentence and conveys that the new image emerged as a result of the studies, maintaining logical consistency with the context.

Meaning: 'Resulted' means to occur as a consequence or outcome of something, indicating that the new understanding of Neanderthals came from the studies.

Wrong options:

  • revealed: 'Revealed' suggests uncovering something that was hidden, but it does not imply a process or outcome as 'resulted' does, making it less suitable in this context.
  • concluded: 'Concluded' implies reaching a final decision or judgment, which does not accurately reflect the ongoing nature of the studies' findings, thus it does not fit the context.
  • happened: 'Happened' is too vague and does not convey the specific outcome or consequence of the studies, making it less precise than 'resulted'.
Correct answer: occupied

Explanation: The word 'occupied' is the correct choice as it refers to the Neanderthals living in Europe during the specified time period. It fits grammatically in the past tense and contextually describes their presence in that region.

Meaning: 'Occupied' means to have lived in or taken up space in a particular area, indicating that Neanderthals were residents of Europe.

Wrong options:

  • resided: 'Resided' is a synonym for living in a place, but it is less commonly used in this context compared to 'occupied', which is more direct and fitting for the sentence structure.
  • filled: 'Filled' implies a physical presence but does not accurately convey the idea of living or inhabiting a space, making it contextually inappropriate.
  • dwelt: 'Dwelt' is an archaic term for living, which may not resonate with modern usage, thus making it less suitable than 'occupied'.
Correct answer: assumed

Explanation: The word 'assumed' fits well as it indicates a belief or conclusion drawn without proof, which aligns with the context of previous misconceptions about Neanderthals. It maintains grammatical consistency in the past tense.

Meaning: 'Assumed' means to take something for granted or to believe something without verification, indicating that researchers had previously held incorrect beliefs about Neanderthal sounds.

Wrong options:

  • judged: 'Judged' implies a more evaluative stance rather than a belief based on assumption, making it less fitting in this context.
  • considered: 'Considered' suggests careful thought, which does not align with the idea of a mistaken belief, thus it is not as appropriate as 'assumed'.
  • taken: 'Taken' is incomplete in this context and does not convey the intended meaning of belief or assumption, making it unsuitable.
Correct answer: coincides

Explanation: The word 'coincides' is appropriate as it indicates that Mithen's work aligns or corresponds with the study of the Neanderthal skeleton. It fits grammatically and contextually, suggesting a relationship between the two studies.

Meaning: 'Coincides' means to occur at the same time or to correspond in nature, indicating that Mithen's findings are in agreement with the skeleton study.

Wrong options:

  • occurs: 'Occurs' is too vague and does not convey the idea of alignment or correspondence, making it less precise than 'coincides'.
  • relates: 'Relates' suggests a connection but lacks the specificity of alignment that 'coincides' provides, thus it is not as fitting.
  • co-operates: 'Co-operates' implies working together, which does not accurately reflect the relationship between the studies, making it unsuitable.
Correct answer: differed

Explanation: The word 'differed' is the correct choice as it indicates that the Neanderthal creature was not the same as humans. It fits grammatically in the past tense and logically conveys the contrast being made.

Meaning: 'Differed' means to be unlike or distinct from something else, indicating that Neanderthals had notable differences from humans.

Wrong options:

  • distinguished: 'Distinguished' implies recognition of differences but does not convey the idea of being different itself, making it less suitable in this context.
  • compared: 'Compared' suggests a process of evaluation rather than stating a fact about differences, thus it does not fit the sentence structure.
  • contrasted: 'Contrasted' implies a comparison highlighting differences but is more complex than necessary for this context, making 'differed' a clearer choice.
Correct answer: build

Explanation: The word 'build' is appropriate as it refers to the physical structure or form of the Neanderthal creature. It fits grammatically and contextually, indicating a characteristic of their anatomy.

Meaning: 'Build' refers to the physical structure or body shape of an organism, indicating that Neanderthals had a specific body type.

Wrong options:

  • assembly: 'Assembly' refers to the act of putting together parts, which does not fit the context of describing a physical characteristic, making it unsuitable.
  • formation: 'Formation' suggests a process of coming together rather than a physical attribute, thus it is less fitting than 'build'.
  • scheme: 'Scheme' implies a plan or arrangement, which does not relate to physical characteristics, making it inappropriate in this context.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...