Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: sectors
Explanation: The term 'sectors' refers to distinct areas of the economy or industries, which fits grammatically as a plural noun that aligns with 'companies' and contextually with the idea of adaptation across various fields of work.
Meaning: In this context, 'sectors' means different branches or areas of business or industry, such as technology, healthcare, and finance.
Wrong options:
- prospects: 'Prospects' refers to potential opportunities or future possibilities, which does not fit the context of industries or areas of work.
- positions: 'Positions' typically refers to specific job roles within a company, not broad categories of industries, making it contextually inappropriate here.
- factories: 'Factories' specifically denotes places where goods are manufactured, which is too narrow and does not encompass the broader concept of various industries.
Correct answer: blurring
Explanation: The word 'blurring' effectively describes the action of making the distinction between work and personal life less clear, fitting grammatically as a gerund that complements the structure of the sentence.
Meaning: 'Blurring' means to make something less distinct or clear, in this case referring to the unclear boundaries between work and personal life.
Wrong options:
- deviating: 'Deviating' implies straying from a path or norm, which does not accurately describe the merging of work and personal life as intended in this context.
- contrasting: 'Contrasting' suggests showing differences, which is the opposite of what is meant here; the sentence discusses merging rather than highlighting differences.
- compounding: 'Compounding' means to make something worse or more intense, which does not fit the context of the sentence regarding the merging of work and personal life.
Correct answer: to be
Explanation: The phrase 'to be' is the correct infinitive form that indicates something is yet to happen or be determined, fitting grammatically and contextually with the future implications of understanding the impact of changes.
Meaning: 'To be' indicates that something is expected or anticipated in the future, in this case, the understanding of the long-term impact of changes.
Wrong options:
- can be: 'Can be' suggests possibility but does not convey the sense of something that is still pending or not yet fully realized, making it less suitable here.
- had been: 'Had been' is a past perfect tense that implies something was understood in the past, which contradicts the context of ongoing uncertainty about future impacts.
- being: 'Being' is a present participle that does not fit the grammatical structure needed here, as it does not convey the future aspect of understanding.
Correct answer: prerequisite
Explanation: The term 'prerequisite' indicates something that is required beforehand, fitting grammatically as a noun that aligns with the context of necessary conditions for jobs.
Meaning: 'Prerequisite' means a requirement that must be met before something else can happen, in this case, access to technology for job eligibility.
Wrong options:
- division: 'Division' refers to the act of separating or categorizing, which does not fit the context of a requirement for jobs.
- commission: 'Commission' typically refers to a fee or a group of people authorized to perform a task, which is unrelated to the context of job requirements.
- probability: 'Probability' indicates likelihood, which does not fit the context of a necessary condition for employment.
Correct answer: combining
Explanation: The word 'combining' effectively describes the action of merging both remote and in-office work elements, fitting grammatically as a gerund that complements the sentence structure.
Meaning: 'Combining' means to bring together different elements, in this case, remote and in-office work practices.
Wrong options:
- mapping: 'Mapping' implies creating a visual representation or plan, which does not accurately describe the integration of work elements as intended in this context.
- conceiving: 'Conceiving' refers to forming an idea or plan, which does not fit the context of actively merging work styles.
- alternating: 'Alternating' suggests switching between two options, which does not convey the idea of integration as effectively as 'combining' does.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation