Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in the Blanks (Dropdown) ID: #43752 National Security Law
Instructions ›
Below is a text with blanks. Click on each blank, a list of choices will appear. Select the appropriate choice for each blank.
Hong  Kong  police  have  offered    of  HK$1m  (£100,400;  $128,000)  for  information    to  the  arrests  of  five  pro-democracy  activists.  They  include  Simon  Cheng,  a  former  UK  consulate  employee    in  2019  in  a  high-profile  case.  The  others  are  Frances  Hui,  Joey  Siu,  Johnny  Fok  and  Tony  Choi.  All  are  accused  of    the  harsh  National  Security  Law.  The  move  was  condemned  by  the  US  and  UK  where  several  of  the  activists  reside.  The  five    have  been  accused  of  various  offences  including  "inciting  secession"  and  "colluding  with  foreign  forces"  to  endanger  national  security.

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: rewards

Explanation: The term 'rewards' fits grammatically as it refers to something given in return for information, aligning with the context of offering a sum for assistance. It is a noun that matches the plural form needed in this context, indicating multiple instances of compensation.

Meaning: 'Rewards' means something given in recognition of service, effort, or achievement, in this case, for providing information.

Wrong options:

  • compensation: While 'compensation' refers to something given to make up for loss or injury, it does not specifically imply a positive incentive like 'rewards' does.
  • bribes: 'Bribes' implies illegal or unethical payments to influence actions, which does not fit the lawful context of police offers.
  • monetary: 'Monetary' is an adjective describing something related to money, but it does not serve as a noun to indicate what is being offered.
Correct answer: leading

Explanation: The word 'leading' is appropriate as it indicates guiding or directing towards the arrests, fitting the context of the sentence. It is a gerund that aligns with the action of providing information that results in arrests.

Meaning: 'Leading' means guiding or directing, in this case, referring to information that helps in the process of making arrests.

Wrong options:

  • conducting: 'Conducting' implies managing or directing an activity, which does not specifically relate to providing information for arrests.
  • ruling: 'Ruling' refers to making a decision or judgment, which does not fit the context of providing information for arrests.
  • fronting: 'Fronting' suggests presenting or leading a group, which does not align with the context of information leading to arrests.
Correct answer: detained

Explanation: The term 'detained' is correct as it refers to being held in custody, which fits the context of the sentence regarding a legal situation. It is the past participle form that matches the tense required here.

Meaning: 'Detained' means being held in custody or confinement, particularly by law enforcement, as in this case.

Wrong options:

  • caught: 'Caught' implies being captured or discovered, but it does not convey the legal context of being held by authorities as 'detained' does.
  • constrained: 'Constrained' suggests being restricted or limited, which does not accurately describe the legal action of being held by police.
  • implemented: 'Implemented' refers to putting something into effect, which does not fit the context of being held in custody.
Correct answer: violating

Explanation: The word 'violating' is suitable as it indicates breaking or disregarding a law, which aligns with the context of the activists' actions. It is a gerund that fits grammatically and contextually in the sentence.

Meaning: 'Violating' means breaking or failing to comply with a law or rule, in this case, the National Security Law.

Wrong options:

  • defying: 'Defying' implies openly resisting or challenging, which does not specifically convey the legal breach that 'violating' does.
  • fouling: 'Fouling' generally refers to making something dirty or unclean, which is not relevant in a legal context.
  • passing: 'Passing' suggests moving past something, which does not relate to the act of breaking a law.
Correct answer: individuals

Explanation: The term 'individuals' is appropriate as it refers to distinct persons, fitting the context of the activists being named. It is a plural noun that aligns with the description of the five people involved.

Meaning: 'Individuals' means separate persons or entities, in this case, referring to the activists mentioned.

Wrong options:

  • bodies: 'Bodies' typically refers to physical forms or organizations, which does not accurately describe the activists as people.
  • residents: 'Residents' implies people living in a specific place, which does not capture the context of their actions as activists.
  • examples: 'Examples' refers to instances or cases, which does not fit the context of naming specific people.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...