Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: preserve
Explanation: The word 'preserve' fits grammatically as it is a verb that indicates maintaining or protecting something, which aligns with the context of maintaining the health of arable land. It also matches the overall sentiment of the sentence, which discusses sustainable agricultural practices.
Meaning: 'Preserve' means to keep something in its original state or in good condition, in this case, the health of the land.
Wrong options:
- dictate: 'Dictate' means to control or determine, which does not fit the context of maintaining health; it implies authority rather than care.
- construct: 'Construct' means to build or create, which is not relevant to the context of maintaining soil health.
- commit: 'Commit' implies a promise or dedication, which does not convey the action of maintaining land health.
Correct answer: cultivation
Explanation: The term 'cultivation' is appropriate as it refers to the act of preparing and using land for growing crops, which directly relates to the practice of crop rotation mentioned in the sentence. It fits both grammatically and contextually.
Meaning: 'Cultivation' means the act of growing and nurturing crops on land.
Wrong options:
- erosion: 'Erosion' refers to the process of soil being worn away, which is contrary to the idea of growing crops and maintaining soil health.
- revision: 'Revision' means to review or alter, which does not apply to the agricultural context of planting crops.
- manufacture: 'Manufacture' refers to making products, which is unrelated to the agricultural process of growing crops.
Correct answer: depletion
Explanation: The word 'depletion' fits well as it refers to the reduction or loss of something, specifically soil nutrients in this context. It aligns with the sentence's focus on preventing nutrient loss through crop rotation.
Meaning: 'Depletion' means the reduction in the quantity or quality of something, here referring to soil nutrients.
Wrong options:
- discovery: 'Discovery' means finding something new, which does not relate to the context of soil nutrients.
- mortality: 'Mortality' refers to death rates, which is irrelevant to the discussion of soil health and nutrients.
- saturation: 'Saturation' means being filled to capacity, which does not accurately describe the loss of nutrients.
Correct answer: would be
Explanation: The phrase 'would be' is grammatically correct as it indicates a future action in a conditional context, fitting the sentence structure that discusses what typically happens in the following year after planting grain crops.
Meaning: 'Would be' indicates a future possibility or expectation, suggesting what is planned for the next planting season.
Wrong options:
- would: 'Would' alone does not complete the conditional structure needed in this context, lacking the necessary auxiliary verb.
- had been: 'Had been' implies a past perfect tense, which does not fit the future context of the sentence.
- had: 'Had' is also a past tense form, which does not align with the future action being described.
Correct answer: cases
Explanation: The word 'cases' fits well as it refers to specific instances or situations, which aligns with the context of discussing different scenarios in crop rotation practices.
Meaning: 'Cases' means particular situations or examples, here referring to different methods of using fallow land.
Wrong options:
- results: 'Results' implies outcomes, which does not fit the context of discussing methods or situations in agriculture.
- points: 'Points' refers to specific items or arguments, which is not relevant to the context of agricultural practices.
- aspects: 'Aspects' refers to features or elements, which does not convey the idea of specific instances as effectively as 'cases'.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation