Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in the Blanks (Dropdown) ID: #44263 Criminals
Instructions ›
Below is a text with blanks. Click on each blank, a list of choices will appear. Select the appropriate choice for each blank.
I    can    imagine    two    reasons    for    criminals    returning    to    the    scene    of    their    crime;    to    see    if    they    left    any    evidence,    or    to    recapture    the    thrill    or    pleasure    that    doing    the    deed    them    -    maybe.    A    third    reason,    I    suppose    a    one    in    some    cases,    is    in    order    to    be  ,    accused    and    captured.    The    annals    of    crime    are    full    of    examples    of    return,    and    murderers    often    admit    a    desire    to    go    back    and    linger    at    the    spot,    plainly    to    be    and    to    receive    attention.    Some    crime    writers    have    labelled    this    desire    guilt    fulfilment’    but    others,    including    myself,    find    this    explanation    too    simplistic.  

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: incriminating

Explanation: The term 'incriminating' fits grammatically as it describes evidence that can establish guilt, aligning with the context of criminals returning to the scene of their crime. It is a specific term that directly relates to the act of committing a crime, making it the most appropriate choice.

Meaning: 'Incriminating' refers to evidence that suggests someone is guilty of a crime, often used in legal contexts.

Wrong options:

  • culpable: Culpable means deserving blame or punishment, but it does not directly describe the type of evidence left behind.
  • liable: Liable refers to being legally responsible, which does not specifically pertain to evidence in this context.
  • offending: Offending means causing displeasure or anger, which is not relevant to the type of evidence being discussed.
Correct answer: afforded

Explanation: The word 'afforded' is used correctly here to indicate that the thrill or pleasure was provided to them as a result of their actions. It fits grammatically and contextually, as it implies that the act of committing the crime gave them a certain experience.

Meaning: 'Afforded' means to provide or give, particularly in the context of experiences or opportunities.

Wrong options:

  • awarded: Awarded implies receiving something as a prize or honor, which does not fit the context of experiencing pleasure from an action.
  • indulged: Indulged suggests giving in to desires, but it does not convey the sense of providing an experience as 'afforded' does.
  • merited: Merited means deserved, which does not accurately describe the relationship between the criminals and the thrill they experienced.
Correct answer: credible

Explanation: The term 'credible' fits well as it describes a reason that is believable or plausible. It aligns with the context of discussing potential motivations for returning to the crime scene, suggesting that this reason could be valid in certain situations.

Meaning: 'Credible' means believable or trustworthy, often used to describe sources of information or reasons.

Wrong options:

  • candid: Candid means honest or straightforward, which does not relate to the believability of a reason in this context.
  • factual: Factual refers to something based on facts, but it does not imply the believability aspect that 'credible' does.
  • worthy: Worthy means deserving attention or respect, which does not fit the context of evaluating the validity of a reason.
Correct answer: spotted

Explanation: The word 'spotted' is appropriate here as it means to be seen or noticed, fitting grammatically and contextually with the idea of criminals wanting to be observed after returning to the scene of their crime.

Meaning: 'Spotted' means to see or notice someone or something, often used in contexts where visibility is key.

Wrong options:

  • viewed: Viewed is a more passive term that does not convey the active sense of being noticed that 'spotted' does.
  • remarked: Remarked implies making a comment about something seen, which does not fit the context of simply being seen or noticed.
  • envisaged: Envisaged means to imagine or visualize, which does not relate to the act of being seen in reality.
Correct answer: apprehended

Explanation: The term 'apprehended' fits well as it means to be caught or arrested, aligning with the context of criminals returning to the scene to potentially receive attention and be captured. It is grammatically and contextually appropriate.

Meaning: 'Apprehended' means to be caught or arrested, particularly in a legal context.

Wrong options:

  • captivated: Captivated means to attract and hold the interest of someone, which does not fit the context of being caught or arrested.
  • confiscated: Confiscated refers to taking something away, usually by authority, which does not relate to the act of being caught.
  • abducted: Abducted means to be taken away unlawfully, which does not fit the context of being seen or caught at the crime scene.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...