Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in the Blanks (Dropdown) ID: #45246 Mass Extinction2
Instructions ›
Below is a text with blanks. Click on each blank, a list of choices will appear. Select the appropriate choice for each blank.
Scientists  have  discovered  the  cause  of  a  mass  extinction  of  sea-floor  marine  organisms  800,000  years  ago  —  which  also  provides  insight  into  how  climate  change  can  impact    deep  ocean  biota.  In  a  new  study    in  the  journal  Nature  Communications,  scientists  from  the  universities  of  Nottingham  and  Durham  and  the  British  Geological  Survey  (BGS),  have  discovered  the  cause  of  a  mass  extinction  within  marine  organisms  called  foraminifera.  Foraminifera  are  an  important  group  in  relation  to  biomass  in  the  deep  ocean  and  the  cause  of  their  extinction  was    unknown.  Scientists  tested  various  possible    for  the  mass  extinction  and  were  able  to  discount  others  such  as  ocean  cooling.  ,  they  discovered  that  the  extinction  was  caused  by  a  global  change  in  plankton  at  the  surface  of  the  ocean.

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: on

Explanation: The preposition 'on' is used to indicate the impact or effect of climate change on deep ocean biota, fitting grammatically and contextually as it shows the relationship between the subject and the object in the sentence.

Meaning: 'On' indicates a relationship of influence or effect, suggesting that climate change has an impact on deep ocean life.

Wrong options:

  • in: The preposition 'in' suggests being inside or within something, which does not convey the intended meaning of influence in this context.
  • of: The preposition 'of' indicates possession or belonging, which does not fit the context of discussing the impact of climate change.
  • off: The preposition 'off' typically indicates separation or distance, which is not appropriate when discussing the effects of climate change.
Correct answer: published

Explanation: The verb 'published' is in the past tense, which is appropriate here as it refers to a completed action that has occurred in the past, aligning with the overall past narrative of the study.

Meaning: 'Published' means that the study has been made publicly available in a journal, indicating that the research findings are now accessible to others.

Wrong options:

  • publishing: The gerund 'publishing' does not fit grammatically as it suggests an ongoing action rather than a completed one.
  • has published: The present perfect 'has published' implies a connection to the present, which is not suitable in this context where the past tense is required.
  • be publishing: The phrase 'be publishing' suggests a future or ongoing action, which does not align with the context of a completed study.
Correct answer: previously

Explanation: The adverb 'previously' indicates that the unknown status of the cause existed before the current findings, fitting grammatically and contextually as it refers to a time frame relevant to the study's results.

Meaning: 'Previously' means at an earlier time, indicating that the cause was not known before the current research was conducted.

Wrong options:

  • occasionally: The adverb 'occasionally' suggests something happens from time to time, which does not fit the context of something being unknown before the study.
  • necessarily: The adverb 'necessarily' implies a requirement or inevitability, which does not apply to the context of knowledge about the cause.
  • currently: The adverb 'currently' refers to the present time, which contradicts the idea that the cause was unknown before the study.
Correct answer: causes

Explanation: The noun 'causes' is plural and fits grammatically as it refers to multiple potential reasons for the mass extinction, aligning with the context of scientific investigation.

Meaning: 'Causes' refers to the reasons or factors that lead to an event, in this case, the mass extinction of marine organisms.

Wrong options:

  • consequences: The noun 'consequences' refers to the results of an action, which does not fit as the focus is on identifying reasons rather than outcomes.
  • elements: The noun 'elements' suggests components or parts, which is too vague and does not specifically refer to reasons for the extinction.
  • factors: The noun 'factors' is similar but less precise than 'causes' in this context, as it does not directly imply reasons for the extinction.
Correct answer: Instead

Explanation: The adverb 'Instead' is used to introduce a contrasting idea, indicating that the findings were different from what might have been expected, fitting well grammatically and contextually within the sentence.

Meaning: 'Instead' means in place of or as an alternative, suggesting that the discovered cause was not what was initially considered.

Wrong options:

  • However: The adverb 'However' introduces a contrast but does not fit as smoothly in this context where a direct alternative is being presented.
  • Thus: The adverb 'Thus' implies a conclusion or result, which does not align with the contrasting nature of the findings being presented.
  • So: The adverb 'So' indicates a consequence, which does not fit the context of presenting an alternative explanation.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...