Meaning: 'Recognised' means acknowledged or accepted as being valid or important, especially in a formal sense.

Wrong options:

• noticed: 'Noticed' implies simply seeing or becoming aware of something, which does not convey the same level of acknowledgment as 'recognised'.
• respected: 'Respected' suggests admiration but does not fit the context of general acknowledgment of his films' significance.
• honoured: 'Honoured' implies receiving a formal award or recognition, which does not apply here since the sentence discusses general acknowledgment rather than formal accolades.

Correct answer: works

Explanation: The term 'works' is appropriate as it refers to artistic creations, fitting the context of discussing Hitchcock's films as artistic endeavors. It is a plural noun that aligns with the preceding phrase about his films.

Meaning: 'Works' refers to the creations or productions of an artist, in this case, Hitchcock's films.

Wrong options:

• labours: 'Labours' suggests hard work or effort but does not specifically denote artistic creations, making it less suitable in this context.
• objects: 'Objects' refers to physical items and does not convey the artistic nature of Hitchcock's films.
• pieces: 'Pieces' can refer to works of art but is less formal and specific than 'works', which is more commonly used in artistic contexts.

Correct answer: stems

Explanation: The verb 'stems' indicates the origin or source of something, which fits well in the context of discussing the source of Hitchcock's genius. It is used correctly in the present tense to indicate an ongoing truth about his talent.

Meaning: 'Stems' means to originate or derive from, indicating that his genius comes from his understanding of film language.

Wrong options:

• rises: 'Rises' implies an increase or elevation, which does not accurately describe the origin of his genius.
• draws: 'Draws' suggests pulling from a source but does not convey the same sense of origin as 'stems'.
• shoots: 'Shoots' is unrelated to the context of origin and typically refers to the act of filming or producing.

Correct answer: described

Explanation: The verb 'described' fits grammatically and contextually as it indicates how film theorists articulated their views about Hitchcock. It is in the past tense, aligning with the narrative of how he was viewed historically.

Meaning: 'Described' means to explain or detail something, in this case, how theorists characterized Hitchcock's work.

Wrong options:

• denounced: 'Denounced' implies a strong condemnation, which is contrary to the positive context of praising Hitchcock.
• declared: 'Declared' suggests a formal announcement but lacks the nuance of detailing or explaining that 'described' provides.
• diagnosed: 'Diagnosed' is typically used in medical contexts and does not fit the artistic evaluation of Hitchcock's work.

Correct answer: suggest

Explanation: The verb 'suggest' fits well as it indicates a proposal or implication, which aligns with the context of the term 'auteur' and its intended meaning regarding Hitchcock's work. It is used in the infinitive form, which is appropriate following 'designed to'.

Meaning: 'Suggest' means to propose or indicate something indirectly, in this case, implying the superiority of Hitchcock's work.

Wrong options:

• advice: 'Advice' is a noun and does not fit grammatically in this context, which requires a verb.
• suppose: 'Suppose' implies a hypothetical situation rather than a direct implication, making it less suitable here.
• advanced: 'Advanced' is the past participle of 'advance' and does not fit the context of suggesting or implying.

Correct answer: come

Explanation: The verb 'come' is used correctly in this context to indicate that Hitchcock's films continue to be examined or scrutinized. It fits grammatically and contextually as it suggests an ongoing action.

Meaning: 'Come' in this context means to arrive at or be subjected to scrutiny, indicating that his films are still being analyzed.

Wrong options:

• bring: 'Bring' implies causing something to happen, which does not fit the context of films being subjected to scrutiny.
• take: 'Take' does not convey the same meaning of being examined or scrutinized as 'come' does.
• get: 'Get' is too informal and does not accurately reflect the academic context of scrutiny.