Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: virtue
Explanation: The word 'virtue' fits grammatically as a noun that describes a quality or trait, aligning with the context of discussing the essence of life. It emphasizes the moral quality of non-violence, which is central to the sentence's theme.
Meaning: 'Virtue' refers to a behavior showing high moral standards, indicating that non-violence is not just a means but a fundamental quality.
Wrong options:
- value: 'Value' suggests worth or importance but does not capture the moral quality that 'virtue' conveys in this context.
- cost: 'Cost' implies a price or sacrifice, which does not align with the positive connotation of non-violence as a moral principle.
- goal: 'Goal' indicates an objective or aim, which does not fit the context of describing a quality or essence.
Correct answer: evil
Explanation: The word 'evil' is appropriate here as it directly relates to the actions that individuals may commit, fitting grammatically and contextually with the moral duty being discussed.
Meaning: 'Evil' refers to morally wrong actions or behaviors, emphasizing the need for love and care despite such actions.
Wrong options:
- crime: 'Crime' refers specifically to illegal acts, which is too narrow and does not encompass all forms of wrongdoing implied in the text.
- act: 'Act' is too vague and does not convey the moral weight that 'evil' does in this context.
- mistake: 'Mistake' implies an error or misunderstanding, which lacks the moral implications associated with 'evil'.
Correct answer: doer
Explanation: The term 'doer' fits grammatically as a noun that refers to the person performing an action, aligning with the context of distinguishing between the action and the individual responsible for it.
Meaning: 'Doer' refers to a person who performs an action, emphasizing the separation between the individual and their deeds.
Wrong options:
- deal: 'Deal' refers to an agreement or transaction, which does not relate to the context of actions and morality.
- means: 'Means' refers to methods or ways of doing something, which does not fit the context of identifying a person.
- measures: 'Measures' implies actions taken to achieve something, but does not refer to the individual responsible for those actions.
Correct answer: non-violence
Explanation: The term 'non-violence' fits grammatically as a noun that describes a principle or philosophy, aligning with the context of Gandhi's teachings and the overall theme of the passage.
Meaning: 'Non-violence' refers to the practice of avoiding violence, emphasizing its importance in Gandhi's philosophy.
Wrong options:
- war-mongering: 'War-mongering' implies promoting war, which contradicts the principles of peace and non-violence discussed in the text.
- love: 'Love' is a broader concept and does not specifically capture the essence of Gandhi's philosophy as effectively as 'non-violence'.
- morality: 'Morality' refers to principles concerning right and wrong behavior, but does not specifically denote the practice of non-violence.
Correct answer: moral
Explanation: The word 'moral' fits grammatically as an adjective describing the type of force, aligning with the context of discussing ethical principles and their power.
Meaning: 'Moral' refers to principles of right and wrong behavior, emphasizing the ethical strength of the force being discussed.
Wrong options:
- weak: 'Weak' implies lack of strength, which contradicts the context of discussing a powerful force.
- small: 'Small' suggests insignificance, which does not align with the idea of a powerful force capable of bringing out goodness.
- big: 'Big' is vague and does not convey the ethical implications that 'moral' does in this context.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation