Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in the Blanks (Dropdown) ID: #47992 Wikipedia
Instructions ›
Below is a text with blanks. Click on each blank, a list of choices will appear. Select the appropriate choice for each blank.
Wikipedia,  crafted  by  ordinary  folks  like  Diana,  who's  penned  extensively  on  World  War  II  and  P  Diddy,  exemplifies  the  democratization  of  information.  The  guidelines,  while  stringent,  occasionally  allow  personality  to  seep  through,  adding    to  entries  like  the  Pope  Mobile.  However,  Wikipedia  is  not  without  its  imperfections.  Misinformation,  though  often  short-lived  thanks  to  vigilant  editors,  can  sometimes  persist.  Yet,  it's  remarkable  that  studies  have  found  it  to  be  more  accurate  than  traditional  encyclopedias  like  Britannica.  This  speaks  volumes  about  the  collective  effort  of  its  contributors  to  maintain  the  integrity  of  this  vast  knowledge  .  It's  a  living  document,  constantly  evolving  with  contributions  from    the  globe.  Whether  it's  minor  edits  or  combating  misinformation,  every  contribution  enriches  this  knowledge  repository.  Debates  over  minutiae,  like  the  capitalization  in  "Star  Trek  Into  Darkness,"  might  seem  trivial  but  reflect  the  deep    invested  in  preserving  knowledge  integrity.  Wikipedia  is  not  just  about    facts;  it's  about  curating  history  in  real-time,  a  collective  endeavor  that's  both  fascinating  and  crucial  in  an  era  of  information  overload.  

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: flavor

Explanation: The word 'flavor' fits contextually as it conveys a sense of personality and uniqueness that can enhance the entries on Wikipedia, aligning with the idea of adding character to the information presented.

Meaning: 'Flavor' refers to a distinctive quality or character, suggesting that the entries have a unique touch due to the contributors' personalities.

Wrong options:

  • heritage: 'Heritage' refers to cultural background or legacy, which does not fit the context of adding personality to entries.
  • mass: 'Mass' implies a large quantity or collective aspect, which does not convey the idea of individuality or character in the entries.
  • essence: 'Essence' refers to the intrinsic nature of something, but it lacks the connotation of personality that 'flavor' provides.
Correct answer: base

Explanation: The term 'base' is appropriate as it refers to the foundational level of knowledge that Wikipedia represents, fitting well within the context of a vast knowledge repository.

Meaning: 'Base' means the underlying support or foundation, indicating that Wikipedia serves as a fundamental source of information.

Wrong options:

  • depth: 'Depth' suggests complexity or thoroughness, which does not align with the idea of a foundational aspect of knowledge.
  • field: 'Field' refers to a specific area of study or interest, which does not accurately describe the comprehensive nature of Wikipedia's knowledge.
  • term: 'Term' refers to a word or expression, which does not relate to the concept of a knowledge repository.
Correct answer: around

Explanation: The word 'around' is suitable as it indicates the global nature of contributions to Wikipedia, emphasizing the widespread involvement of people from various locations.

Meaning: 'Around' means in the vicinity of or surrounding, highlighting the international aspect of Wikipedia's contributors.

Wrong options:

  • within: 'Within' suggests being inside a specific area, which does not convey the global participation implied in the context.
  • over: 'Over' implies a sense of superiority or excess, which does not fit the context of global contributions.
  • through: 'Through' suggests a process or passage, which does not accurately represent the idea of contributions coming from various places.
Correct answer: care

Explanation: The word 'care' is fitting as it reflects the attention and concern that contributors have for maintaining the integrity of knowledge, aligning well with the context of preserving accuracy.

Meaning: 'Care' refers to the effort and attention given to something, indicating the dedication of contributors to uphold knowledge integrity.

Wrong options:

  • intrigue: 'Intrigue' suggests curiosity or fascination, which does not convey the sense of responsibility and attention needed for preserving knowledge.
  • mind: 'Mind' refers to cognitive processes, which does not relate to the emotional investment in maintaining knowledge integrity.
  • observation: 'Observation' implies watching or noticing, which does not capture the proactive effort involved in preserving knowledge.
Correct answer: compiling

Explanation: The word 'compiling' is appropriate as it indicates the act of gathering and organizing information, which is central to the function of Wikipedia as a knowledge repository.

Meaning: 'Compiling' means to collect and assemble information, highlighting the active role of contributors in creating content.

Wrong options:

  • noting: 'Noting' implies simply recording information, which does not encompass the comprehensive effort involved in creating Wikipedia entries.
  • qualifying: 'Qualifying' suggests adding conditions or limitations, which does not fit the context of gathering information.
  • prevailing: 'Prevailing' refers to being widespread or dominant, which does not relate to the act of gathering and organizing knowledge.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...