Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Reading and Writing Fill in the Blanks ID: #49985 Counterfeit Wines
Instructions ›
Below is a text with blanks. Click on each blank, a list of choices will appear. Select the appropriate choice for each blank.
Here  are  two    unrelated  facts.  One:  from  the  late  1940s  through  1963,  we  tested  atomic  bombs  in  the  atmosphere.  Two:  wine  lovers  are  sometimes  duped  into    exorbitant  amounts  for  fake  vintage  bottles  that  weren't  from  the  year  they  were  supposedly  grown.  But  Graham  Jones  at  Australia's  University  of  Adelaide  thought  he  could  use  bomb  information  against  counterfeit  wines.  Carbon  dating  works  by  comparing  the  amount  of  carbon  14,  which  is  a  less  common  and  less  stable  form  of  carbon,  to  the  more  abundant  carbon  12.  For    of  years,  the  ratio  between  the  two  has  been  the  same.  But  those  two  decades  of  atomic  bomb  tests  increased  the  C-14  in  the  atmosphere.  And  as  growing  grapes  absorb  carbon  dioxide,  they  take  in  trace  amounts  of  the  heavier  carbon  isotope—which  eventually  show  up  in  the  wine.  The    team  checked  C-14  levels  in  20  Australian  red  wines  with  vintages  from  1958  to  1997.  They  compared  the  wine's  C-14  to  C-14  in    samples  from  the  same  years,  and  found  a  direct  match—C-14  levels  could  give  away  the  vintage  year  for  each  wine.  So  beware  of  wine  scammers.  Because  even  at  the  atomic  level,  in  vino  veritas.

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: seemingly

Explanation: The word 'seemingly' fits grammatically as it serves as an adverb modifying the adjective 'unrelated,' indicating that the facts appear to be unrelated. This aligns with the context of presenting facts that may not have an obvious connection.

Meaning: 'Seemingly' means 'appearing to be true but not necessarily so,' suggesting that the facts may look unrelated at first glance.

Wrong options:

  • feelingly: 'Feelingly' implies expressing emotion, which does not fit the context of describing facts.
  • endearingly: 'Endearingly' suggests a charming or lovable quality, which is irrelevant when discussing unrelated facts.
  • entreatingly: 'Entreatingly' means in a pleading manner, which does not apply to the description of facts.
Correct answer: spending

Explanation: The verb 'spending' correctly fits the context as it describes the action of wine lovers using money, aligning with the phrase 'duped into.' It is grammatically correct as it follows the preposition 'into' and matches the context of financial expenditure.

Meaning: 'Spending' refers to the act of using money to purchase something, in this case, fake vintage bottles.

Wrong options:

  • dipping: 'Dipping' refers to immersing something in a liquid, which does not relate to the context of financial transactions.
  • trekking: 'Trekking' means to make a long journey, which is unrelated to the act of spending money.
  • swinging: 'Swinging' implies moving back and forth or engaging in a lively manner, which does not fit the context of financial expenditure.
Correct answer: thousands

Explanation: The word 'thousands' fits grammatically as it quantifies the noun 'years,' indicating a large number. This is contextually appropriate as it refers to the extensive time frame over which the carbon ratio has remained consistent.

Meaning: 'Thousands' refers to a number in the range of 1,000 or more, emphasizing the long duration of years being discussed.

Wrong options:

  • couples: 'Couples' refers to pairs of items or people, which does not apply to the context of years.
  • much: 'Much' is used with uncountable nouns and does not fit with the plural noun 'years.'
  • numerous: 'Numerous' is an adjective that means many, but it does not fit grammatically as it does not quantify 'years' directly.
Correct answer: research

Explanation: The noun 'research' fits grammatically as it serves as the subject of the sentence, indicating the team involved in the study. Contextually, it aligns with the scientific investigation being described.

Meaning: 'Research' refers to a systematic investigation to establish facts or principles, which is relevant to the study of wine and carbon levels.

Wrong options:

  • individual: 'Individual' refers to a single person or thing, which does not fit the context of a team conducting a study.
  • preparation: 'Preparation' implies the act of getting ready, which is not relevant to the context of conducting a study.
  • strange: 'Strange' describes something unusual, which does not apply to the context of a scientific team.
Correct answer: atmospheric

Explanation: The adjective 'atmospheric' fits grammatically as it describes the noun 'samples,' indicating the source of the C-14 levels being tested. This is contextually appropriate as it relates to the carbon levels in the atmosphere.

Meaning: 'Atmospheric' refers to anything related to the atmosphere, which is relevant to the carbon samples being analyzed.

Wrong options:

  • physical: 'Physical' refers to something tangible or material, which does not specifically relate to the context of carbon samples from the atmosphere.
  • fluid: 'Fluid' refers to a substance that flows, which does not apply to the context of atmospheric samples.
  • solid: 'Solid' describes a state of matter that is firm and stable, which is not relevant to the context of atmospheric samples.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 50% Easy · 0% Medium · 50% Hard
Saving...