Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in the Blanks (Dropdown) ID: #51203 Legendary Scientists
Instructions ›
Below is a text with blanks. Click on each blank, a list of choices will appear. Select the appropriate choice for each blank.
Einstein,  Newton  and  many  other  legendary  scientists  did  groundbreaking  work  in  their  20s.  But  if  your  hair  has  gone  gray  and  no  Nobel  seems  likely,  don't  fret  just  yet.  Because  the  age  at  which    work  gets  done  has  been  going  up.  So  says  a  study  in  the  Proceedings  of  the  National  Academy  of  Sciences  .  Researchers    525  science  Nobel  Prize-winners  from  1901  to  2008.  In  the  small  sample  before  1905,  about    of  Nobel  winners  did  their  major  work  before  age  40.  But  by  2000  most  laureates  did  their  cited  work  after  age  40.  The  entire  field  of  quantum  mechanics  was  predominantly  a  young  man's  game  —  which  meant  that  as  late  as  1934,  more  than  three-quarters  of  physics  prizes  were  for  work  done  by  people  under  40.  But  the  more  mature  researchers  have  steadily    their  catch  since  then.  The  study  authors  note  that  a  shift  from  theoretical  to  experimental  work  can  account  for  some  of  the  age  change.  It  also  takes  longer  to  educate  and  train  new  contributors  to  now-mature  fields.  So  keep  plugging.  Unlike  the  youthful  Archimedes,  your  "eureka"  moment  may  come  in  a  bathtub  with  safety  bars.

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: Nobel-winning

Explanation: The term 'Nobel-winning' fits grammatically as it serves as an adjective describing the type of work being referenced. It aligns contextually with the preceding discussion about Nobel Prize winners and their achievements, indicating that the work in question is of a caliber that could lead to a Nobel Prize.

Meaning: 'Nobel-winning' refers to work that has been recognized with a Nobel Prize, indicating high achievement in a scientific field.

Wrong options:

  • Stripling: 'Stripling' refers to a young person, which does not fit the context of describing significant scientific work; it lacks the necessary connection to the Nobel Prize.
  • Pretending: 'Pretending' implies a false representation or act, which is irrelevant in this context where genuine scientific work is being discussed.
  • Persevering: 'Persevering' describes the act of continuing despite difficulties, but it does not specifically relate to the type of work being done, making it contextually inappropriate.
Correct answer: analyzed

Explanation: The verb 'analyzed' is the correct choice as it indicates that researchers examined the data of Nobel Prize winners in detail. This fits grammatically in the past tense and contextually as it describes the action taken by researchers in the study.

Meaning: 'Analyzed' means to examine something methodically and in detail, typically for purposes of explanation and interpretation.

Wrong options:

  • comprised: 'Comprised' means to consist of or be made up of, which does not fit the context of what researchers did with the data; it lacks the action of examination.
  • bribed: 'Bribed' implies offering something to influence someone, which is completely unrelated to the context of scientific research and analysis.
  • utilized: 'Utilized' means to make practical use of something, but it does not convey the specific action of examining data, making it less suitable.
Correct answer: two-thirds

Explanation: The phrase 'two-thirds' fits grammatically as a quantifier indicating a proportion, which is appropriate in the context of discussing the number of Nobel winners. It provides a clear statistical reference that aligns with the sentence's focus on age and achievement.

Meaning: 'Two-thirds' refers to a fraction representing two out of three parts, indicating a significant majority of Nobel winners in this context.

Wrong options:

  • technocrats: 'Technocrats' refers to experts in technology or technical fields, which does not fit the context of discussing proportions of Nobel winners.
  • drags: 'Drags' is a colloquial term that implies something slow or burdensome, which is irrelevant in this statistical context.
  • skirts: 'Skirts' refers to a type of clothing or can imply avoiding something, neither of which relates to the statistical discussion of Nobel winners.
Correct answer: increased

Explanation: The verb 'increased' is appropriate as it indicates a growth in the number of mature researchers, fitting grammatically in the past tense and contextually as it describes a trend over time in the field of research.

Meaning: 'Increased' means to become greater in size, amount, or degree, indicating that the number of mature researchers has grown.

Wrong options:

  • beeped: 'Beeped' refers to a sound made by a device, which is completely unrelated to the context of research and achievement.
  • deceit: 'Deceit' refers to the act of deceiving or misleading, which does not fit the context of discussing the growth of researchers.
  • yeast: 'Yeast' is a type of fungus used in baking and brewing, which has no relevance to the context of scientific research or achievement.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 75% Easy · 0% Medium · 25% Hard
Saving...