Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in the Blanks (Dropdown) ID: #52398 Particle pollution
Instructions ›
Below is a text with blanks. Click on each blank, a list of choices will appear. Select the appropriate choice for each blank.
Particle  pollution  —  also  called  particulate  matter  (PM)  —  is  made  up  of  particles  of  solids  or  liquids  that  are  in  the  air.  Particle  pollution  can  come  from  two  different  kinds  of  sources  primary  or  secondary.  Primary    cause  particle  pollution  on  their  own.  For  example,  wood  stoves  and  forest  fires  are  primary  sources.  Secondary  sources  let  off  gases  that  can  form  particles.  Power  plants  and  coal  fires  are  examples  of  secondary  sources.  Some  other  common  sources  of  particle  pollution  can  be  either    or  secondary  —  for  example,  factories,  cars  and  trucks,  and  construction  sites.  Smoke  from  fires  and  emissions  from  power  plants,  industrial  facilities,  and  cars  and  trucks  contain  PM2.5.  Breathing  in  particle  pollution  can  be    to  your  health.  Coarse  particles,  called  PM10,  can  irritate  your  eyes,  nose,  and  throat.  Dust  from  roads,  farms,  dry  riverbeds,  construction  ,  and  mines  are  types  of  PM10.

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: sources

Explanation: The word 'sources' fits grammatically as it is a plural noun that aligns with the context of the sentence, which discusses types of sources causing particle pollution. It matches the subject-verb agreement with 'cause' and is coherent with the preceding phrase about primary sources.

Meaning: 'Sources' refers to the origins or causes of something, in this case, the origins of particle pollution.

Wrong options:

  • somatic: The term 'somatic' relates to the body and does not fit the context of pollution sources.
  • stymie: 'Stymie' means to obstruct or hinder, which does not apply to the context of identifying sources of pollution.
  • sundry: 'Sundry' means various or diverse, but it does not serve as a noun that can act as a subject in this context.
Correct answer: primary

Explanation: The word 'primary' is an adjective that describes the type of sources being referred to in the context of particle pollution. It fits grammatically as it modifies the noun 'sources' and is consistent with the earlier mention of primary sources.

Meaning: 'Primary' means first or main, indicating that these sources are the principal contributors to particle pollution.

Wrong options:

  • patience: 'Patience' refers to the ability to wait without frustration, which is irrelevant in the context of pollution sources.
  • performance: 'Performance' relates to how well something functions, which does not apply to the context of sources of pollution.
  • paraphrase: 'Paraphrase' means to restate something in different words, which does not fit the context of identifying types of sources.
Correct answer: harmful

Explanation: The word 'harmful' is an adjective that describes the negative impact of particle pollution on health. It fits grammatically as it complements the verb 'can be' and aligns with the context of discussing health effects.

Meaning: 'Harmful' means causing or capable of causing damage or injury, indicating that particle pollution poses risks to health.

Wrong options:

  • habitat: 'Habitat' refers to the natural environment of an organism, which does not relate to the effects of pollution on health.
  • harvest: 'Harvest' refers to the process of gathering crops, which is unrelated to the context of health effects from pollution.
  • hence: 'Hence' is an adverb meaning 'for this reason,' which does not fit grammatically or contextually in this sentence.
Correct answer: sites

Explanation: The word 'sites' is a plural noun that refers to locations where activities occur, fitting grammatically as it aligns with the context of discussing places contributing to PM10 pollution. It matches the structure of the sentence and maintains coherence with the preceding examples.

Meaning: 'Sites' refers to specific locations or areas, in this case, where dust and pollution are generated.

Wrong options:

  • scrutinize: 'Scrutinize' means to examine closely, which does not fit as a noun in this context.
  • safety: 'Safety' refers to the condition of being protected from harm, which does not apply to the context of locations contributing to pollution.
  • sarcastic: 'Sarcastic' describes a form of verbal irony, which is irrelevant in the context of discussing pollution sites.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 92% Easy · 0% Medium · 8% Hard
Saving...