Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in the Blanks (Dropdown) ID: #5445 Bio-energy 2
Instructions ›
Below is a text with blanks. Click on each blank, a list of choices will appear. Select the appropriate choice for each blank.
Peering  into  the  future  seldom  produces  a  clear  picture.  But  this  is  not  the    with  bio-energy.  Its  long-term  impacts  on  the  global  economy  appear  to  be  pretty  clear,  making  many  long-term  predictions  quite  compelling,  including  the  demise  of  the  price-setting  power  of  the  Organization  of  the  Petroleum  Exporting  Countries  and  the  end  of  agricultural  protectionism.  First,  technology  is    to  deliver  a  biofuel  that  will  be  competitive  with  fossil  energy  at  something  like  current  prices.  It  probably  already  has.  Brazil  has  been  exporting  ethanol  to  the  US  at  an  average  delivery  price  of  $1.45  for  an  amount  with  the  energy  equivalence  of  a  gallon  of  petrol.  It  is  doing  so  profitably  and  in  increasing  amounts,  in  spite  of  a  54  cents  a  gallon  tariff  to  protect  American  maize-based  ethanol  .  Many  countries  are  following  suit.  But  ethanol  is  an  inconvenient  chemical  compound  that  is  corrosive  and  soluble  in  water,  thus  limiting  its  immediate  market  to  that  of  a  gasoline  additive.  However,  this  is  just  the  Betamax  phase  of  the  industry.  There  is  plenty  of  private  venture  capital  money  being    into  finding  more  efficient  ways  of  extracting  energy  from  biomass  and  delivering  it  to  transport  and  power  systems.  Over  time,  the  technology  will  also  become  more  flexible,  allowing  more  crops  to  be  used  as  feedstock,  not  just  the  current  choice  of  sugarcane,  maize  and  palm  oil.  New  technologies  will  be  able  to  extract  energy  from  cellulose,  allowing  the  use  of  pastures  such  as  switch  grass  as  well  as  the  refuse  of  current  food  production.

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: circumstances

Explanation: The word 'circumstances' fits grammatically as it refers to the conditions or factors surrounding a situation, which aligns with the context of discussing bio-energy. The sentence implies that the situation with bio-energy is different from the unclear predictions about the future, making 'circumstances' the most suitable choice.

Meaning: Circumstances refer to the specific conditions or factors that affect a situation or event.

Wrong options:

  • occurrence: Occurrence refers to an event or happening, which does not fit the context of discussing the conditions surrounding bio-energy.
  • incidence: Incidence refers to the rate or frequency of something happening, which is not relevant in this context as it does not address the conditions or factors involved.
  • condition: Condition refers to the state of something, but it is too vague and does not capture the broader context of various factors that influence the situation.
Correct answer: bound

Explanation: The word 'bound' is used here to indicate that technology is expected or destined to deliver a biofuel, fitting grammatically and contextually as it conveys a sense of obligation or certainty about future developments in biofuel technology.

Meaning: Bound means destined or certain to happen, indicating that technology will inevitably deliver a competitive biofuel.

Wrong options:

  • assured: Assured implies a guarantee, but it does not convey the same sense of inevitability as 'bound' does in this context.
  • called: Called suggests naming or labeling, which does not fit the context of technology delivering a product.
  • constrained: Constrained implies limitations, which contradicts the positive expectation of technology delivering a competitive biofuel.
Correct answer: producers

Explanation: The term 'producers' fits grammatically and contextually as it refers to those who create or manufacture ethanol, aligning with the discussion about the ethanol market and the impact of tariffs on American maize-based ethanol.

Meaning: Producers are individuals or entities that create or supply goods, in this case, ethanol.

Wrong options:

  • directors: Directors refer to individuals who manage or oversee operations, which does not fit the context of those who produce ethanol.
  • programmers: Programmers are individuals who write computer code, which is irrelevant in the context of ethanol production.
  • harvesters: Harvesters refer to those who gather crops, which does not accurately describe the entities involved in the production of ethanol.
Correct answer: poured

Explanation: The word 'poured' is appropriate here as it conveys the idea of significant investment being made into research and development, fitting both grammatically and contextually with the sentence's focus on financial commitment to bio-energy advancements.

Meaning: Poured means to invest or allocate a large amount of resources, typically money, into something.

Wrong options:

  • emptied: Emptied suggests removing contents, which does not fit the context of investing resources into a project.
  • streamed: Streamed implies a continuous flow, which does not accurately convey the act of investing money in this context.
  • spent: Spent indicates the use of resources but lacks the connotation of a deliberate and substantial investment that 'poured' conveys.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...