Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in the Blanks (Dropdown) ID: #5470 Utopia 2
Instructions ›
Below is a text with blanks. Click on each blank, a list of choices will appear. Select the appropriate choice for each blank.
Many  Utopias  have  been  dreamed  up  through  the  ages.  From  Plato's  Republic  to  Thomas  More's  Utopia  and  beyond,  serious  thinkers  have    societies  where  people  live  in  peace  and  harmony.  Most  of  these  imaginary  worlds  have  things  in  common:  everybody  is  equal  and  plays  a  part  in  the  running  of  the  society;  nobody  goes  without  the    of  life;  people  live  mostly  off  the  land;  often  there  is  no  money,  and  so  on.  Another  thing  they  have  in  common  is  that,  to  the  average  person,  they  appear  distasteful  or  unworkable  since  they  do  not  take  into  account  ordinary  human  nature  or  feelings.
Architects  have  got  in  on  the  act,  too.  After  the  Great  Fire  of  London,  Christopher  Wren  drew  up  plans  for  a    of  the  whole  city,  including  precise  street  widths.  And  in  the  20th  century  there  was  Le  Corbusier's  Radiant  City  in  which,  if  you  weren't  in  a  car  or  didn't  have  one,  life  would  have  been  a  nightmare.
Also  in  the  20th  century;  another  famous  architect,  Frank  Lloyd  Wright,  dreamed  up  a  perfect  city  that  got  no  further  than  the  drawing-board.  Wright  believed  that  what  was  wrong  with  modern  cities  was,  in  his  words,  rent.  Ideas,  land,  even  money  itself,  had  to  be  paid  for.  He  saw  this  as  a  form  of  slavery  and  believed  that  modern  city  dwellers  had  no  sense  of  themselves  as  productive  individuals.  Thus,  Wright's  city  was  to  be  made  up  of  numerous  individual  homesteads,  and  the  houses  themselves  were  to  be  simple,  functional  and  in    with  the  environment.  Everyone  would  own  enough  land  to  grow  food  for  himself  and  his  family.  No  outsiders  would  be  allowed  to  come  between  the  citizen  and  what  he  produced,  or  to    both  for  money.  Goods  and  services  would  all  be  exchanged,  not  bought  and  sold  for  profit.

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: envisioned

Explanation: The word 'envisioned' fits grammatically as the past participle form aligns with the present perfect tense used in the sentence. It conveys the idea of imagining or conceptualizing future societies, which is contextually appropriate given the discussion of Utopias.

Meaning: 'Envisioned' means to imagine or visualize something that is not yet real, particularly in a hopeful or idealistic way.

Wrong options:

  • seen: 'Seen' implies merely observing something that exists, which does not capture the creative aspect of imagining Utopias.
  • dreamt: 'Dreamt' suggests a more passive form of imagining, often associated with sleep, and lacks the proactive connotation of envisioning.
  • idealised: 'Idealised' means to regard something as perfect, but it does not convey the act of creating a vision or concept, which is central to the context.
Correct answer: essentials

Explanation: The term 'essentials' is appropriate as it refers to the fundamental needs required for life, fitting grammatically and contextually within the sentence structure.

Meaning: 'Essentials' refers to the basic necessities or fundamental requirements for living, such as food, water, and shelter.

Wrong options:

  • needs: 'Needs' is a broader term that could imply various requirements, but it lacks the specificity of 'essentials' in this context.
  • wants: 'Wants' refers to desires that are not necessary for survival, making it unsuitable as it contradicts the idea of basic life requirements.
  • ingredients: 'Ingredients' typically refers to components of a recipe or mixture, which does not align with the context of life necessities.
Correct answer: reconstruction

Explanation: The word 'reconstruction' fits grammatically as it refers to the process of rebuilding or restoring something, which is the intended meaning in the context of city planning after the Great Fire.

Meaning: 'Reconstruction' means the act of rebuilding or restoring something that has been damaged or destroyed.

Wrong options:

  • redecoration: 'Redecoration' implies changing the appearance of something without structural changes, which does not fit the context of rebuilding a city.
  • rearrangement: 'Rearrangement' suggests changing the order or position of things, which is not applicable to the comprehensive rebuilding of a city.
  • recomposition: 'Recomposition' refers to changing the composition or structure of something, but it lacks the clarity of 'reconstruction' in the context of city planning.
Correct answer: harmony

Explanation: The word 'harmony' fits well as it conveys a sense of balance and compatibility with the environment, aligning with the overall theme of creating a perfect city.

Meaning: 'Harmony' means a pleasing arrangement or compatibility, particularly in relation to living in balance with nature.

Wrong options:

  • contact: 'Contact' refers to physical interaction, which does not convey the intended meaning of coexistence with the environment.
  • peace: 'Peace' implies the absence of conflict, which, while related, does not specifically address the relationship with the environment as 'harmony' does.
  • community: 'Community' refers to a group of people living together, but it does not capture the essence of balance with the environment.
Correct answer: exploit

Explanation: The word 'exploit' fits grammatically and contextually as it conveys the idea of taking advantage of someone or something, particularly in a negative sense, which aligns with the sentence's meaning.

Meaning: 'Exploit' means to take unfair advantage of someone or something, often for personal gain.

Wrong options:

  • usurp: 'Usurp' means to take a position of power or importance illegally or by force, which does not fit the context of economic transactions.
  • rob: 'Rob' implies taking property unlawfully from a person or place, which is too direct and does not encompass the broader economic exploitation intended here.
  • corrupt: 'Corrupt' refers to moral degradation or dishonesty, which does not specifically address the act of taking advantage of resources or individuals.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...