Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in the Blanks (Dropdown) ID: #6408 Economic 3
Instructions ›
Below is a text with blanks. Click on each blank, a list of choices will appear. Select the appropriate choice for each blank.
For  the  past  thirty  years,  the  United  States  has  been  conducting  what  one  observer  (Samuelson  2001)  has  called  “a  massive  social  experiment”  regarding  the  political  and  social  consequences  of  increasing  economic  inequality.  The  share  of  national  income  going  to  families  in  the  bottom  40  percent  of  the  income  distribution    by  about  one-fifth,  from  17.4%  in  1973  to  13.9%  in  2001,    the  share  going  to  families  in  the  top  5  percent  increased  by  more  than  one-third,  from  15.5%  to  21.0%  (Mishel,  Bernstein,  and  Boushey  2003).  ,  the  share  of  income  going  to  the  top  one-tenth  of  one  percent  quadrupled  between  1970  and  1998,  leaving  the  13,000  richest  families  in  America  with  almost  as  much  income  as  the  20  million  poorest  families  (Krugman  2002).  The  economic  causes  of  these  trends—technological  change?  demography?  global  competition?—are  a  matter  of  some    controversy.  But  the  important  political  point  is  that,  whereas  most  rich  democracies  have  significantly  mitigated  increasing  economic  inequality  through  government  action,  the  United  States  has  mostly  been  content  to    economic  trends  take  their  course,  doing  “less  than  almost  any  other  rich  democracy  to    economic  inequality”  through  employment  and  wage  policies,  taxes,  and  transfers  (Jencks  2002,  64).

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: declined

Explanation: The word 'declined' fits grammatically as it is in the past tense, matching the context of the sentence which discusses a historical change in income distribution. It also aligns with the overall negative trend being described regarding the share of income for families in the bottom 40 percent.

Meaning: 'Declined' means to decrease or diminish in amount or quality, indicating that the share of income for the bottom 40 percent has reduced over the specified time period.

Wrong options:

  • spurned: 'Spurned' means to reject or refuse disdainfully, which does not fit the context of income distribution.
  • spurred: 'Spurred' means to encourage or stimulate, which contradicts the negative trend being discussed.
  • raised: 'Raised' means to increase, which is the opposite of what is being described in the sentence.
Correct answer: while

Explanation: The word 'while' serves as a conjunction that indicates a contrast between two simultaneous actions, which is appropriate here as it connects the decline in income share for the bottom 40 percent with the increase for the top 5 percent.

Meaning: 'While' means during the time that or at the same time as, indicating that the two trends occurred concurrently but in opposite directions.

Wrong options:

  • therefore: 'Therefore' implies a conclusion or result, which does not fit the contrasting nature of the trends being described.
  • however: 'However' suggests a contradiction but does not indicate simultaneous actions, making it less suitable in this context.
  • since: 'Since' indicates a time relationship rather than a contrast, which does not align with the intended meaning.
Correct answer: Meanwhile

Explanation: The word 'Meanwhile' is used to indicate that something is happening at the same time as something else, which fits well in the context of discussing the simultaneous trends in income distribution.

Meaning: 'Meanwhile' means at the same time or during the same period, emphasizing the concurrent nature of the income changes for different groups.

Wrong options:

  • Accordingly: 'Accordingly' suggests a consequence or result, which does not fit the context of simultaneous trends.
  • Nevertheless: 'Nevertheless' implies a contrast but does not indicate simultaneous actions, making it less suitable here.
  • Consequently: 'Consequently' indicates a result or outcome, which does not align with the concurrent nature of the trends being discussed.
Correct answer: scholarly

Explanation: The word 'scholarly' fits grammatically and contextually as it describes the type of controversy being discussed, indicating that it is a matter of academic debate or research.

Meaning: 'Scholarly' means related to academic study or research, suggesting that the controversy involves serious analysis and discussion among experts.

Wrong options:

  • childish: 'Childish' implies immaturity, which does not fit the context of a serious academic discussion.
  • archaic: 'Archaic' means outdated or no longer in use, which does not apply to the current debate on economic causes.
  • banking: 'Banking' refers to the financial industry and does not relate to the nature of the controversy being discussed.
Correct answer: let

Explanation: The word 'let' is appropriate here as it indicates allowing something to happen without interference, fitting the context of the United States' passive approach to economic trends.

Meaning: 'Let' means to allow or permit, suggesting that the U.S. has not taken action to change the course of economic trends.

Wrong options:

  • the: 'The' is a definite article and does not fit grammatically as a verb in this context.
  • commit: 'Commit' implies taking action or making a promise, which contradicts the passive nature of the statement.
  • default: 'Default' suggests failing to act or fulfill an obligation, which does not convey the same meaning as 'let' in this context.
Correct answer: limit

Explanation: The word 'limit' fits grammatically and contextually as it indicates the action of reducing or controlling economic inequality, which aligns with the overall message of the sentence.

Meaning: 'Limit' means to restrict or control, suggesting that the U.S. has done little to reduce economic inequality through various policies.

Wrong options:

  • abolish: 'Abolish' means to completely eliminate, which is a stronger action than what is implied in the context of limiting inequality.
  • flounder: 'Flounder' means to struggle or have difficulty, which does not fit the intended meaning of taking action to control inequality.
  • nurture: 'Nurture' means to care for or encourage growth, which is contrary to the idea of limiting economic inequality.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...