One is the size of an identifiable peasantry or the size of the rural relative to the urban population. The other is a matter of social integration: agrarian parties to be important, the representation of countryside or peasantry must not be integrated the other major sections of society. , a country might possess a sizeable rural population, but have an economic system in which the interests of the voters were predominantly related to their incomes, their occupations or location; and in such a country the political system would be unlikely to include an important agrarian party.
Result:
AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: whether
Explanation: The word 'whether' introduces a clause that presents alternatives or conditions, fitting grammatically and contextually as it questions the existence of agrarian parties. It aligns with the overall inquiry about their importance and existence.
Meaning: 'Whether' is used to indicate a choice between alternatives, in this case, questioning if agrarian parties exist or not.
Wrong options:
- however: 'However' is a conjunctive adverb that indicates contrast, which does not fit the context of questioning existence.
- in: The preposition 'in' does not introduce a conditional clause and does not fit grammatically in this context.
- and: 'And' is a conjunction that connects ideas but does not introduce a conditional or alternative scenario.
- for: 'For' is a preposition that indicates purpose or reason, which does not fit the context of questioning existence.
- with: 'With' is a preposition that indicates association, which does not fit the grammatical structure needed here.
- Thus: 'Thus' is an adverb that indicates a conclusion or result, which does not fit the context of questioning existence.
Correct answer: for
Explanation: The word 'for' is a preposition that indicates purpose or necessity, fitting grammatically and contextually as it introduces the condition required for agrarian parties to be important.
Meaning: 'For' indicates the purpose or reason something is necessary, in this case, the importance of agrarian parties.
Wrong options:
- however: 'However' is a conjunctive adverb that indicates contrast, which does not fit the context of indicating necessity.
- in: The preposition 'in' does not convey purpose and does not fit grammatically in this context.
- and: 'And' is a conjunction that connects ideas but does not indicate purpose or necessity.
- whether: 'Whether' introduces alternatives, which does not fit the context of indicating necessity for importance.
- with: 'With' is a preposition that indicates association, which does not convey the necessary condition for importance.
- Thus: 'Thus' is an adverb that indicates a conclusion, which does not fit the context of indicating necessity.
Correct answer: with
Explanation: The word 'with' is a preposition that indicates association or integration, fitting grammatically and contextually as it describes how the representation must relate to other sections of society.
Meaning: 'With' indicates a relationship or connection, in this case, how agrarian representation relates to other societal sections.
Wrong options:
- however: 'However' is a conjunctive adverb that indicates contrast, which does not fit the context of describing integration.
- in: The preposition 'in' does not convey the correct relationship needed in this context.
- and: 'And' is a conjunction that connects ideas but does not indicate the necessary relationship for integration.
- for: 'For' indicates purpose, which does not fit the context of describing how representation must relate to society.
- Thus: 'Thus' is an adverb that indicates a conclusion, which does not fit the context of describing integration.
Correct answer: Thus
Explanation: The word 'Thus' is an adverb that indicates a conclusion or result, fitting grammatically and contextually as it introduces the consequence of the previous statements about agrarian parties.
Meaning: 'Thus' means 'as a result' or 'therefore,' indicating a conclusion drawn from the previous information.
Wrong options:
- however: 'However' is a conjunctive adverb that indicates contrast, which does not fit the context of concluding statements.
- in: The preposition 'in' does not indicate a conclusion and does not fit grammatically in this context.
- and: 'And' is a conjunction that connects ideas but does not indicate a conclusion or result.
- for: 'For' indicates purpose, which does not fit the context of concluding statements.
- with: 'With' is a preposition that indicates association, which does not fit the context of concluding statements.
Correct answer: rather than
Explanation: The phrase 'rather than' is used to indicate preference or contrast, fitting grammatically and contextually as it contrasts the interests of voters based on income versus occupation or location.
Meaning: 'Rather than' indicates a preference for one thing over another, in this case, income over occupation or location.
Wrong options:
- however: 'However' is a conjunctive adverb that indicates contrast, but does not fit the structure needed to show preference.
- in: The preposition 'in' does not convey contrast or preference and does not fit grammatically in this context.
- and: 'And' is a conjunction that connects ideas but does not indicate preference or contrast.
- for: 'For' indicates purpose, which does not fit the context of contrasting interests.
- with: 'With' is a preposition that indicates association, which does not fit the context of contrasting interests.
The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.
Sign in to read the full explanation