Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in The Blanks (Drag & Drop) ID: #33741 Textile Industry
Instructions ›
In the text below some words are missing. Drag words from the box below to the appropriate place in the text. To undo an answer choice, drag the word back to the box below the text.
* Drag the correct answer into all target fields
The  environmental  impact  of  the  global  textile  industry  is  hard  to  overstate.  One-third  of  the  water  used  worldwide  is  spent  fashioning  fabrics.  For  every  ton  of  cloth  ,  200  tons  of  water  is  polluted  with  chemicals  and  heavy  metals.  An  estimated  1  trillion  kilowatt-hours  of  electricity  powers  the  factories  that  card  and  comb,  spin  and  weave,  and  cut  and  stitch  materials  into  everything  from  T-shirts  to  towels,    behind  mountains  of  solid  waste  and  a  massive  carbon  footprint.  "Where  the  industry  is  today  is  not  really  sustainable  for  the  long  term,"  says  Shreyaskar  Chaudhary,  chief  executive  of  Pratibha  Syntex,  a  textile  manufacturer  based  outside  Indore,  India.  With  something  of  an  "if  you  build  it,  they  will  come"  attitude,  Mr.  Chaudhary  has  steered  Pratibha    the  leading  edge  of  eco-friendly  textile  production.  Under  his  direction,  Pratibha  began  making  clothes  with  organic  cotton  in  1999.  Initially,  the  company  couldn't  find  enough  organic  farms  growing  cotton  in  central  India  to    its  factories.  To  meet  production  demands,  Chaudhary's  team  had  to  convince  conventional  cotton  farmers  to  change  their  growing  methods.  Pratibha  provided  seeds,  cultivation  instruction,  and  a  guarantee  of  fair  trade  prices  for  their  crops.  Today,  Pratibha  has  a  network  of  28,000  organic  cotton  growers  across  the  central  states  of  Madhya  Pradesh,  Maharashtra,  and  Orissa.

fund lagging designed toward Leaving produced supply

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: produced

Explanation: The word 'produced' is the past participle form of the verb 'produce,' which fits grammatically as it describes the action of making cloth. The sentence structure requires a past participle to indicate the result of the action, aligning with the context of discussing the environmental impact of textile production.

Meaning: 'Produced' means to have made or manufactured something, in this case, cloth.

Wrong options:

  • Leaving: 'Leaving' is a present participle that does not fit the grammatical structure required here, as it does not describe the action of making cloth.
  • supply: 'Supply' is a verb that does not fit in this context, as it refers to providing something rather than the act of making cloth.
  • toward: 'Toward' is a preposition indicating direction, which does not fit grammatically in this sentence.
  • designed: 'Designed' is a past participle that refers to the act of creating a plan or drawing, which does not relate to the production of cloth in this context.
  • lagging: 'Lagging' is a present participle that implies falling behind, which does not fit the context of production.
  • fund: 'Fund' is a noun or verb related to providing financial resources, which does not relate to the action of producing cloth.
Correct answer: Leaving

Explanation: The word 'Leaving' is a present participle that indicates an ongoing action resulting from the previous clause. It fits grammatically as it describes the consequence of the textile production process, which is the generation of waste and carbon footprint.

Meaning: 'Leaving' means to cause something to remain or be in a particular state, in this case, waste and a carbon footprint.

Wrong options:

  • produced: 'Produced' is a past participle that does not fit here, as it does not convey the ongoing action of resulting waste.
  • supply: 'Supply' is a verb that does not fit grammatically in this context, as it does not relate to the action of leaving behind waste.
  • toward: 'Toward' is a preposition that does not fit in this context, as it does not describe an action or result.
  • designed: 'Designed' is a past participle that refers to the act of creating a plan, which does not relate to the ongoing action of leaving waste.
  • lagging: 'Lagging' is a present participle that implies falling behind, which does not fit the context of leaving waste behind.
  • fund: 'Fund' is a noun or verb related to providing financial resources, which does not relate to the action of leaving waste.
Correct answer: toward

Explanation: The word 'toward' is a preposition that indicates direction or orientation. It fits grammatically as it describes the direction in which Pratibha is moving in terms of eco-friendly production, aligning with the context of the sentence.

Meaning: 'Toward' means in the direction of or with regard to, indicating a movement or focus on eco-friendly practices.

Wrong options:

  • produced: 'Produced' is a past participle that does not fit as it does not indicate direction or orientation in this context.
  • supply: 'Supply' is a verb that does not fit grammatically here, as it does not convey direction or movement.
  • Leaving: 'Leaving' is a present participle that does not fit as it does not indicate direction but rather an action that has already occurred.
  • designed: 'Designed' is a past participle that refers to the act of creating a plan, which does not relate to direction or movement.
  • lagging: 'Lagging' is a present participle that implies falling behind, which does not fit the context of moving toward a goal.
  • fund: 'Fund' is a noun or verb related to providing financial resources, which does not relate to direction.
Correct answer: supply

Explanation: The word 'supply' is a verb that fits grammatically as it describes the action of providing organic cotton to the factories. The context requires a verb that indicates the action of meeting production demands.

Meaning: 'Supply' means to provide or make available, in this case, organic cotton for production.

Wrong options:

  • produced: 'Produced' is a past participle that does not fit here, as it does not convey the action of providing cotton.
  • Leaving: 'Leaving' is a present participle that does not fit as it does not relate to the action of supplying cotton.
  • toward: 'Toward' is a preposition that does not fit in this context, as it does not describe an action of providing.
  • designed: 'Designed' is a past participle that refers to the act of creating a plan, which does not relate to the action of supplying cotton.
  • lagging: 'Lagging' is a present participle that implies falling behind, which does not fit the context of providing cotton.
  • fund: 'Fund' is a noun or verb related to providing financial resources, which does not relate to the action of supplying cotton.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...