Loading question...
You are in free guest mode. Timed Practice Revision List Attempt History Progress Tracking Create a free account to unlock these tools
Prev Next
Practice Reading: Fill in The Blanks (Drag & Drop) ID: #37209 Asking Questions
Instructions ›
In the text below some words are missing. Drag words from the box below to the appropriate place in the text. To undo an answer choice, drag the word back to the box below the text.
* Drag the correct answer into all target fields
It  is  important  that  scientists  be  seen  as  normal  people  asking  and  answering  important  questions.  Good,  sound  science  depends  on  ,  experiments  and  reasoned  methodologies.  It  requires  a  willingness  to  ask  new  questions  and  try  new  approaches.  It  requires  one  to  take  risks  and  experience  failures.  But  good  science  also  requires    understanding,  clear  explanation  and  concise  presentation.  Our  country  needs  more  scientists  who  are  willing  to  step  out  in  the  public    and  offer  their  opinions  on  important  matters.  We  need  more  scientists  who  can  explain  what  they  are  doing  in  language  that  is    and  understandable  to  the  public.  Those  of  us  who  are  not  scientists  should  also  be  prepared  to  support  public  engagement  by  scientists,  and  to    scientific  knowledge  into  our  public  communications.

eponym ethos arena illusive incorporate contextual compeling hypotheses

Result:

AI explanationShows the answer. Tap to open.
Correct answer: hypotheses

Explanation: The term 'hypotheses' fits grammatically as it is a plural noun that aligns with the context of scientific inquiry, which involves formulating hypotheses before conducting experiments. It maintains the logical flow of the sentence, emphasizing the foundational elements of good science.

Meaning: Hypotheses are proposed explanations made on the basis of limited evidence as a starting point for further investigation.

Wrong options:

  • eponym: Eponym refers to a name derived from a person, which does not fit the context of scientific processes.
  • illusive: Illusive means deceptive or misleading, which does not relate to the scientific method or its requirements.
  • ethos: Ethos refers to the characteristic spirit of a culture or community, which does not fit as a foundational element of scientific inquiry.
Correct answer: contextual

Explanation: The word 'contextual' is an adjective that describes the type of understanding required in science, emphasizing the importance of situating scientific knowledge within relevant contexts. This aligns with the need for clarity and relevance in scientific communication.

Meaning: Contextual means relating to the circumstances or setting in which something occurs, highlighting the importance of understanding the background of scientific concepts.

Wrong options:

  • eponym: Eponym does not fit as it describes a naming convention rather than a type of understanding needed in science.
  • illusive: Illusive does not apply here as it refers to something deceptive, which contradicts the need for clear understanding in science.
  • ethos: Ethos is unrelated to the type of understanding required in scientific discourse.
Correct answer: arena

Explanation: The term 'arena' fits contextually as it refers to a public space where discussions and debates occur, aligning with the idea of scientists engaging with the public. It maintains the logical flow of the sentence regarding public engagement.

Meaning: Arena refers to a place or scene of activity, often used metaphorically to describe a public forum for discussion.

Wrong options:

  • eponym: Eponym does not fit as it refers to a name derived from a person, which does not relate to public engagement.
  • illusive: Illusive is not appropriate here as it refers to something deceptive, which does not align with the concept of a public space.
  • ethos: Ethos does not fit as it refers to the character or credibility of a person or community, rather than a physical or metaphorical space.
Correct answer: compeling

Explanation: The word 'compeling' (likely intended to be 'compelling') is an adjective that describes the quality of the language used by scientists, indicating that it should be engaging and persuasive. This aligns with the need for effective communication with the public.

Meaning: Compelling means evoking interest, attention, or admiration in a powerfully irresistible way.

Wrong options:

  • eponym: Eponym does not fit as it refers to a name derived from a person, which does not relate to the quality of language.
  • illusive: Illusive is inappropriate as it means deceptive, which contradicts the need for clarity in communication.
  • ethos: Ethos does not apply here as it refers to the character or credibility of a person, rather than the quality of language.
Correct answer: incorporate

Explanation: The term 'incorporate' is a verb that fits grammatically and contextually, indicating the action of including scientific knowledge in public communications. It aligns with the overall message of promoting public engagement with science.

Meaning: Incorporate means to include or integrate a part into the whole, emphasizing the need to blend scientific knowledge into everyday communication.

Wrong options:

  • eponym: Eponym does not fit as it refers to a name derived from a person, which does not relate to the action of including knowledge.
  • illusive: Illusive is not appropriate here as it means deceptive, which does not align with the intention of integrating knowledge.
  • ethos: Ethos does not apply as it refers to the character or credibility of a person, rather than an action of inclusion.

The rest of this explanation is for members. Sign in free to read why the other options are wrong, key words and tips.

Sign in to read the full explanation

With a free account: Retry and compare every attempt.
Be the first! No community answers here yet. Submit yours and help others learn.
How difficult was this question?
Others found: 100% Easy · 0% Medium · 0% Hard
Saving...